• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Elephant in the Room

BirdinHand said:
Here you go, will screen shots make you feelbetter.
Click to expand...
That is not about eugenics. He is... I am not. I am not really sure what my point was back then, 15 years ago, but it was more about 3rd World Countries being unstable and bad places to live and that his post was screwing with people, or something. Anyway... think whatever you like... we have you lying in threads here... now. But you grasp for something from 15 years ago if you like. LOL
 
Cool guy: Eugenics should be implemented.

Bodi: Dang guy... you are cool. I dig your style, no ****.


But no…it wasn’t about eugenics.


Damn. Talk about gaslighting. Sell that lie to someone else.
 
BirdinHand said:
Cool guy: Eugenics should be implemented.

Bodi: Dang guy... you are cool. I dig your style, no ****.


But no…it wasn’t about eugenics.


Damn. Talk about gaslighting. Sell that lie to someone else.
Click to expand...
The conversation was about over-population... not controlled selective breeding of human populations (as by sterilization) to improve the population's genetic composition. Get a ****ing grip... AND STOP LYING. LOL
 
so you know all these women on the outside? So they tell you what they think privately? There are many people here who think you are inane, but they don’t post in the thread yet.. lol
I’m sorry the 1+1 = 3 went over your head and….. but then again, you are the master of taking things out of context and taking everything literally
 
Seems like you might hate children... or resent them. Can you explain why you want children to grow up in poverty? Around drugs and gangs?
 
Bodi said:
Seems like you might hate children... or resent them. Can you explain why you want children to grow up in poverty? Around drugs and gangs?
Click to expand...
Exactly why the male should either accept or be compelled by law to accept sharing responsibility for the support of a child he contributed to the creation of.
 
Individual said:
Exactly why the male should either accept or be compelled by law to accept sharing responsibility for the support of a child he contributed to the creation of.
Click to expand...
Exactly why the female should either accept or be compelled by law to abort a child that she can not support...

...do you see how stupid that logic is?

Why do you support child poverty?
 
BirdinHand said:
Cool guy: Eugenics should be implemented.

Bodi: Dang guy... you are cool. I dig your style, no ****.


But no…it wasn’t about eugenics.


Damn. Talk about gaslighting. Sell that lie to someone else.
Click to expand...
Why do you support Child Poverty?
 
Bodi said:
Exactly why the female should either accept or be compelled by law to abort a child that she can not support...

...do you see how stupid that logic is?

Why do you support child poverty?
Click to expand...
I totally agree, compelling a Woman to have an abortion has to be the most stupid logic I've seen yet.

I'm not the one wanting to eliminate irresponsible males from being compelled to share in the care or a child he contributed to the creation of.
His opportunity to abort ended when he chose to leave his sperm in the womb of the Woman, leaving him to bear any consequences relative to the choice the Woman alone is forced to make.
The male is then left only to have an opinion relative to the choice forced upon the Woman to make.
 
I showed how the logic refuted your attempt. If you missed it then read again... if you do not understand then ask for help.
 
Bodi said:
I showed how the logic refuted your attempt. If you missed it then read again... if you do not understand then ask for help.
Click to expand...
Your logic refuted nothing at all. It's no different from what you've presented multiple times previously, only to be soundly refuted each time.
All that needs to be understood is the needs of the child, regardless of ones intent to create.
 
Individual said:
Your logic refuted nothing at all. It's no different from what you've presented multiple times previously, only to be soundly refuted each time.
All that needs to be understood is the needs of the child, regardless of ones intent to create.
Click to expand...
Are you asking for help?
 
Bodi said:
Why do you support Child Poverty?
Click to expand...
I’ve said no such thing.

You, on the other hand, have shown your support for eugenics.

Why do you feel as though it is YOUR business to dictate who can/cannot have children?

It’s a worse idea than your “post conception opt out” and I didn’t think it could get worse than that.

But…here we are.
 
Bodi said:
The conversation was about over-population... not controlled selective breeding of human populations (as by sterilization) to improve the population's genetic composition. Get a ****ing grip... AND STOP LYING. LOL
Click to expand...
Eugenics is in play the moment you decide not to date another person, or let another person kiss or touch you, or have sex with another person without contraception because you find something about them not good looking, mentally inferior, etc. Everyone practices eugenics. The issue is violating others' autonomy, e.g., as by involuntary sterilization.
 
Individual said:
Your logic refuted nothing at all. It's no different from what you've presented multiple times previously, only to be soundly refuted each time.
All that needs to be understood is the needs of the child, regardless of ones intent to create.
Click to expand...
It's not a child until it's born. Before that, it's potential.
 
Bodi said:
Exactly why the female should either accept or be compelled by law to abort a child that she can not support...

...do you see how stupid that logic is?

Why do you support child poverty?
Click to expand...

Not only do you shit all over the child's statutory right to child support, now you shit on women's rights to bodily autonomy. Wow. All to save men some cashola...cashola that they CHOSE to risk to have sex. Hindsight's a bitch eh? Regret and cross their fingers? If there are so many men that think like you do...time to grow up eh? Make better decisions in their own best interests?

You never have identified what rights men are being denied. Care to? After being asked in zillions of posts in your deadbeat dad threads?
 
BirdinHand said:
I’ve said no such thing.
Click to expand...
In post after post you have...
BirdinHand said:
You, on the other hand, have shown your support for eugenics.
Click to expand...
All you have are lies... unless you don't understand the basic definition, and that is probably worse. LOL
BirdinHand said:
Why do you feel as though it is YOUR business to dictate who can/cannot have children?

It’s a worse idea than your “post conception opt out” and I didn’t think it could get worse than that.

But…here we are.
Click to expand...
Yes... scratching our heads at the stupid shit that you conclude.
 
Bodi said:
In post after post you have...

All you have are lies... unless you don't understand the basic definition, and that is probably worse. LOL

Yes... scratching our heads at the stupid shit that you conclude.
Click to expand...
Pretty sure the head-scratching isn't directed toward me.
 
choiceone said:
Eugenics is in play the moment you decide not to date another person, or let another person kiss or touch you, or have sex with another person without contraception because you find something about them not good looking, mentally inferior, etc. E
Click to expand...
What a weird misunderstanding of the term

Definition of EUGENICS

the practice or advocacy of controlled selective breeding of human populations (as by sterilization) to improve the populations' genetic composition… See the full definition
www.merriam-webster.com
 
Bodi said:
ummm... nope.
Click to expand...

Once again, your deadbeat support threads devolve into you calling everyone else a liar or some other personal attack while unable to directly refute their arguments. Every single time...and all you do is cry that they're not playing by your rules.

Yeah, they are. Your pathetic deadbeat dad OP's get longer and longer each time as you try to shore up the gaping holes...and fail each time.

There's zero integrity in your offensive snark when you're losing, again.

Posts 8 & 10 ...put up or....

Post Conception Opt-Out FOR MEN

This argument is only for places/States where Abortion is 100% Legal. This is also not about how the law currently is... but in modifying the law. Post Conception Opt-Out FOR MEN This argument is not about biology. This argument is about the law. The issue is currently unequal under the law...
debatepolitics.com

And dont forget you said:

Bodi said:
That has happened and been thrown out by the Judge. Pre-birth contracts are irrelevant compared to the interest of the child.
Click to expand...

Why do you keep leading people on and posting in bad faith?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.