• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Debate: Why Biden Got Destroyed. It's Very Simple and Obvious.

Maybe her own words will do the trick. The only embarrassing thing is your support of a racist and Nazi sympathizer.


She even presented at a Ku Klux Klan rally in 1926 in Silver Lake, N.J. She recounted this event in her autobiography: "I accepted an invitation to talk to the women's branch of the Ku Klux Klan ... I saw through the door dim figures parading with banners and illuminated crosses ... I was escorted to the platform, was introduced, and began to speak ... In the end, through simple illustrations I believed I had accomplished my purpose. A dozen invitations to speak to similar groups were proffered" (Margaret Sanger, "An Autobiography," Page 366). That she generated enthusiasm among some of America's leading racists says something about the content and tone of her remarks.

In a letter to Clarence Gable in 1939, Sanger wrote: "We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members" (Margaret Sanger commenting on the 'Negro Project' in a letter to Gamble, Dec. 10, 1939).



Back up



Was the picture you posted fake?


Try to save a shred of your credibility and man up


No one should believe a thing you post until you be honest
[/QUOTE]

She met the Klan. She says so herself. So, I would say the picture is accurate. Nice diversion from your support for a racist. Sad.

 
Back up



Was the picture you posted fake?


Try to save a shred of your credibility and man up


No one should believe a thing you post until you be honest

She met the Klan. She says so herself. So, I would say the picture is accurate. Nice diversion from your support for a racist. Sad.
[/QUOTE]
The picture was completely faked. That scene never happened. It is a total fraud.


Deny that
 
She met the Klan. She says so herself. So, I would say the picture is accurate. Nice diversion from your support for a racist. Sad.
The picture was completely faked. That scene never happened. It is a total fraud.


Deny that
[/QUOTE]

Hilarious watching you scramble for cover. She met the Klan. It's in her book. She wrote the letter about the black race. Even PP of NY is removing her name. Why do you support a racist?
 
No link. Dismissed

Uh huh. She not only consorted with the Klan but praised Nazi Germany's eugenics policies. This is all easily found if you really want to know about it.
[/QUOTE]


And there’s no evidence that the KKK image shared in the Facebook post had anything to do with Sanger. It was taken during a Ku Klux Klan ritual in Georgia on Jan. 1, 1930, according to Getty Images. In the Facebook post, the photo has been altered to make it look like Sanger is in the frame along with a sign welcoming her to the meeting. However, the original photo shows a white cross where this doctored image makes it look like Sanger is standing. There is no sign referencing Sanger in the original photo either.
 
The picture was completely faked. That scene never happened. It is a total fraud.


Deny that

Hilarious watching you scramble for cover. She met the Klan. It's in her book. She wrote the letter about the black race. Even PP of NY is removing her name. Why do you support a racist?
[/QUOTE]



Was the picture you posted a fake?


It's a simple question.


Try to save your credibility.



Is that photo a fake?
 
I can't believe with all the highly-paid pundits on the airwaves, not one of them hit the key takeaway of the debates. Mashmont, sitting in his La-Z-Boy saw it within the first 30 seconds. I should get their salaries.

Here's the overriding point: No matter what you thought about Trump's decorum, aggressiveness, manners, whatever, the thing that immediately stood out was Biden's elderly, disconnected, befuddled, sedate mien. He seemed at least 20 years older than Trump. On the occasions when he didn't present like he was ready for his 11:00 a.m. nap, Biden came off like your senile grandpa railing against the paperboy. That's what America saw. It was obvious from the opening bell. Meaning, regardless what Biden said or did, it looked obvious to the American people that Biden would have no ability to handle the intricate, constant, exhausting job in the world, the presidency of the United States. Think about it, people. When the guy can't get out of his basement to do even ONE campaign stop, he has neither the energy nor mental acuity to to handle the job.

Trump punished Biden like Trevor Berbick pounded the 40-year-old Muhammed Ali in his last fight. Except Biden was never an Ali. He was more like Joe Bugner. Trump got five shots in before Biden could gather nimself and respond to the first one. Rat-a-tat-tat. Biden was so distracted trying to fend of Trump's parries, he couldn't even finish a thought.

So you have the worst most addled candidate in 100 years, and saddle him with the most extreme ridiculous agenda in the history of politics, highlighted (lowlighted) by defunding of the police and the $100 trillion Green New Deal, you pit him against an agile accomplished charismatic incumbent---and you get what we got. A dominant debate shellacking by President Trump
You mean addled like this?

" So when I listened to Joe talking about a transition, there's been no transition from when I won. I won that election. And if you look at crooked Hillary Clinton, if you look at all of the different people, there was no transition. Because they came after me trying to do a coup. They came after me spying on my campaign. They started on the day I won and even before I won. From the day I came down the escalator with the First Lady, they were a disaster, a grace to our country. And we've caught them. We've caught them all. We've got it all on tape. We've caught them all. And by the way, you gave the idea for the Logan act against General Flynn. You better take a look at that because we caught you in a sense. And President Obama was sitting in the Oval office. He knew about it too so don't tell me about a free transition. As far as the ballots is concerned, it's a disaster. A solicited ballot. Okay, so listen it is okay. You're soliciting, you're asking they send it back, you send it back. I did that. If you have an unsolicited, they're sending millions of ballots all over the country. There’s fraud. They found them in creeks. They found some with the name Trump, just happen to have the name Trump, just the other day. In wastepaper baskets. They’re being sent all over the place. They sent two, in a Democratic area they sent out 1000 ballots. Everybody got two ballots. This is going to be a fraud like you've never seen. The other thing, it's nice for November 3, you're watching and you see who won the election. And I think we're gonna do well because people are really happy with the job they've done. But you know what, we won't know, we might not know for months. Because these balances are going to be all over. Take a look at what happened in Manhattan. Take a look at what happened in New Jersey. Take a look at what happened in Virginia and other places. They're not losing 2%, 1%, which by the way is too much. An election can be won or lost with that. They’re losing 30 and 40%. A fraud, and it's a shame. And can you imagine where they say, ‘you have to have your ballot in by November 10’. November 10. That means 7 days after the election, in theory, should have been announced. We have major states with that. All run by Democrats. All run by Democrats. It’s a rigged election. "
 
Uh huh. She not only consorted with the Klan but praised Nazi Germany's eugenics policies. This is all easily found if you really want to know about it.


And there’s no evidence that the KKK image shared in the Facebook post had anything to do with Sanger. It was taken during a Ku Klux Klan ritual in Georgia on Jan. 1, 1930, according to Getty Images. In the Facebook post, the photo has been altered to make it look like Sanger is in the frame along with a sign welcoming her to the meeting. However, the original photo shows a white cross where this doctored image makes it look like Sanger is standing. There is no sign referencing Sanger in the original photo either.
[/QUOTE]

So what? She met them as she says in her book, photo or no photo. So, do you disavow her or not?
 
Hilarious watching you scramble for cover. She met the Klan. It's in her book. She wrote the letter about the black race. Even PP of NY is removing her name. Why do you support a racist?



Was the picture you posted a fake?


It's a simple question.


Try to save your credibility.



Is that photo a fake?
[/QUOTE]

You said so. What does that have to do with her beliefs and statements? Oh right, nothing.
 
And there’s no evidence that the KKK image shared in the Facebook post had anything to do with Sanger. It was taken during a Ku Klux Klan ritual in Georgia on Jan. 1, 1930, according to Getty Images. In the Facebook post, the photo has been altered to make it look like Sanger is in the frame along with a sign welcoming her to the meeting. However, the original photo shows a white cross where this doctored image makes it look like Sanger is standing. There is no sign referencing Sanger in the original photo either.

So what? She met them as she says in her book, photo or no photo. So, do you disavow her or not?
[/QUOTE]
You first.


Is the photo you posted a fake?


If you are going to post fake news nothing you day can be trusted.


So is the photo a fake?
 
Was the picture you posted a fake?


It's a simple question.


Try to save your credibility.



Is that photo a fake?

You said so. What does that have to do with her beliefs and statements? Oh right, nothing.
[/QUOTE]
But do you say so.


You posted it



Is the photo a fake?



Just run away dude
 
You said so. What does that have to do with her beliefs and statements? Oh right, nothing.
But do you say so.


You posted it



Is the photo a fake?



Just run away dude
[/QUOTE]

You're the one running. You're running from the odious person you support. Guess now that you're educated, you might change your opinion. Then again, maybe not.
 
But do you say so.


You posted it



Is the photo a fake?



Just run away dude

You're the one running. You're running from the odious person you support. Guess now that you're educated, you might change your opinion. Then again, maybe not.
[/QUOTE]
You cant say the truth


You cant save a shred of your credibility.



You posted fake news, got caught, and still you wont deny it.



You got busted lying.



Nothing you post can be trusted
 
We don't know why Trump's followers support Trump.
Only if you don't pay attention. Trump stands up to the bully, meaning the MSM and the Democratic party's PC police

They rarely talk about what Trump actually does and says.
MSM does not report it, which is very different from it not happening.

As an example, there was no response from them regarding my comments on the Presidential debate where Trump made an idiot of himself that had GOP leaders cringing.
When you assume your conclusion, you tend to end debate. Your statement is the moral equivalent of, "When did you stop beating your children?"

Instead, they concentrate on Democrats.
That gives a symmetry. You only talk about Trump.

Following Trump's fantasies
More pejoritives.

they create horror stories about what would happen if Biden is elected, all of it unsubstantiated and none of it makes any sense. "If Biden is elected he will defund police departments." "If Biden is elected he will endorse violent left wing extremists like antifa who are destroying our cities."
Are you claiming Antifa is not violent, not destroying cities or that Biden does not endorse them? All would require documentation.

The only way to support Trump is to lie.
You just lied enough for both sides. You can support Trump based on job performance, ie the traditional standard.

Perhaps they support Trump because they know he is a complete jerk.
More like in spite of him being a jerk. He does a good job running the country, which counts for a lot.

Photoshopped
Are you saying he did not even draw that many?
 
Are you saying he did not even draw that many?

Certainly. Presidential candidate ahead in the polls by 10 points drawing only 3 people one month before the election??????? Come on!
 
Certainly. Presidential candidate ahead in the polls by 10 points drawing only 3 people one month before the election??????? Come on!
With Biden that seems reasonable. Who would voluntarily hear him speak?
 
You dont even know what we are talking about.


But the orange cheeto had to suffer thru bone spurs!!!!!


HAHAHAHAHA
By playing tennis and obviously unsuccessfully dodging STDs...

He is clearly in the late stages of syphilis...
 
Back
Top Bottom