The Debate: Why Biden Got Destroyed. It's Very Simple and Obvious.

[vegas giants]

The ONLY way the confused, incoherent, establishment fossil you've put forward can win is through massive fraud. In any election where millions and millions of unsolicited mail ballots were not flooding the system to intentionally overwhelm and manipulate it, Biden couldn't win more than 10-12 states. Even with the gross levels of fraud the Dems will attempt, they are still going to lose. People want security and they want law and order. Biden and the Dems offer neither nor much of anything else a rational person would want. Their attempts to game the system and steal the election will be defeated.

Dude you have no credibility.


All this nonsense is dismissed

 

[lurchadams]

I can't believe with all the highly-paid pundits on the airwaves, not one of them hit the key takeaway of the debates. Mashmont, sitting in his La-Z-Boy saw it within the first 30 seconds. I should get their salaries.

Here's the overriding point: No matter what you thought about Trump's decorum, aggressiveness, manners, whatever, the thing that immediately stood out was Biden's elderly, disconnected, befuddled, sedate mien. He seemed at least 20 years older than Trump. On the occasions when he didn't present like he was ready for his 11:00 a.m. nap, Biden came off like your senile grandpa railing against the paperboy. That's what America saw. It was obvious from the opening bell. Meaning, regardless what Biden said or did, it looked obvious to the American people that Biden would have no ability to handle the intricate, constant, exhausting job in the world, the presidency of the United States. Think about it, people. When the guy can't get out of his basement to do even ONE campaign stop, he has neither the energy nor mental acuity to to handle the job.

Trump punished Biden like Trevor Berbick pounded the 40-year-old Muhammed Ali in his last fight. Except Biden was never an Ali. He was more like Joe Bugner. Trump got five shots in before Biden could gather nimself and respond to the first one. Rat-a-tat-tat. Biden was so distracted trying to fend of Trump's parries, he couldn't even finish a thought.

So you have the worst most addled candidate in 100 years, and saddle him with the most extreme ridiculous agenda in the history of politics, highlighted (lowlighted) by defunding of the police and the $100 trillion Green New Deal, you pit him against an agile accomplished charismatic incumbent---and you get what we got. A dominant debate shellacking by President Trump

"Biden got destroyed". What a delusion! The only thing trump's trying to destroy is our democracy.

 

[veritas1]

That's just plain silly. If that were the case why is Biden 10 points ahead of Trump in every poll in the country? Oh, I remember. It's fake news.

You think Trump supporters are answering these polls or are being frank about their support? The polls said Hill was a shoo-in in 2016, too. People putting confidence in polls are bound to be disappointed.

 

[vegas giants]

That's just plain silly. If that were the case why is Biden 10 points ahead of Trump in every poll in the country? Oh, I remember. It's fake news.

And the polls in the swing states show a clear advantage for biden

 

[veritas1]

Dude you have no credibility.


All this nonsense is dismissed

I wasn't talking to you, Junior. Tell me again why you venerate a racist like Sanger? I don't expect an answer.

 

[vegas giants]

I wasn't talking to you, Junior. Tell me again why you venerate a racist like Sanger? I don't expect an answer.

You do know she was a pro lifer....dont you?


HAHAHAHAHA

 

[lurchadams]

Trump could have shat himself visibly during the debate and the OP would praise him for a great performance.

trump actually did shit himself, but it was all pouring out of his mouth which made it extra disgusting!

 

[veritas1]

You do know she was a pro lifer....dont you?


HAHAHAHAHA

You have no clue as to what eugenics is, do you? This is sad.

 

[vegas giants]

You have no clue as to what eugenics is, do you? This is sad.

Did she support abortion.....yes or no?


You are too easy

 

[lurchadams]

The ONLY way the confused, incoherent, establishment fossil you've put forward can win is through massive fraud. In any election where millions and millions of unsolicited mail ballots were not flooding the system to intentionally overwhelm and manipulate it, Biden couldn't win more than 10-12 states. Even with the gross levels of fraud the Dems will attempt, they are still going to lose. People want security and they want law and order. Biden and the Dems offer neither nor much of anything else a rational person would want. Their attempts to game the system and steal the election will be defeated.

I doubt even you believe the garbage you just posted.

 

[lurchadams]

This IS no discernable violent white supremacymovement, unless you're talking about the white kids in Antifa masks tearing the hell out of the black neighborhoods.

You're wrong (as always).

Trump frequently accuses the far-left of inciting violence, yet right-wing extremists have killed 329 victims in the last 25 years, while antifa members haven't killed any, according to a new study

Counter-terrorism expert Seth Jones, who helped create the dataset, told The Guardian: "Left-wing violence has not been a major terrorism threat."

www.businessinsider.com

 

[veritas1]

Cant do it can you? Lol


I will help. It was in silver lake New Jersey. But she never met with any klan members at that time.


Can you guess why?



You are priceless

It's right in her f'ing book. Holy crap, you're a hoot.

 

[vegas giants]

It's right in her f'ing book. Holy crap, you're a hoot.

Got it. She was against abortion.


I knew you could get there

 

[veritas1]

I doubt even you believe the garbage you just posted.

There's only one reason that Dems want massive mail in voting and we all know what it is. They seem to be fine with rioting but think going to a controlled environment like a polling place is somehow dangerous? Nobody buys that crap for a second. Without the pandemic, Trump would utterly destroy Biden. Even so, he will win, no matter how much China has tried to help Biden.

 

[veritas1]

Got it. She was against abortion.


I knew you could get there

You treat stupidity like a virtue. Sanger didn't need to support abortion when she already supported sterilization. Do you understand anything whatsoever?

 

[vegas giants]

You treat stupidity like a virtue. Sanger didn't need to support abortion when she already supported sterilization. Do you understand anything whatsoever?

So you admit she was a pro lifer.


Thanks. That was easy

 

[veritas1]

So you admit she was a pro lifer.


Thanks. That was easy

It's always easy when no thought is involved. So, for you, it's always easy.

 

[vegas giants]

It's always easy when no thought is involved. So, for you, it's always easy.

You dont think?


Ok if you say so. Lol

 

[veritas1]

Al

Did she support abortion.....yes or no?


You are too easy

Already addressed, Junior. Now, why do you venerate this racist, again?

 

[ultmd]

The ONLY way the confused, incoherent, establishment fossil you've put forward can win is through massive fraud. In any election where millions and millions of unsolicited mail ballots were not flooding the system to intentionally overwhelm and manipulate it, Biden couldn't win more than 10-12 states. Even with the gross levels of fraud the Dems will attempt, they are still going to lose. People want security and they want law and order. Biden and the Dems offer neither nor much of anything else a rational person would want. Their attempts to game the system and steal the election will be defeated.

So, I guess the above details your prefabricated rationalizations for all of the fake-outrage we'll see from you in November, huh?

• The only way Biden can win is through massive fraud.
• ...millions and millions of unsolicitied mail ballots...flooding the system...
• The people want security and they want law and order.

These are, LITERALLY, the words and talking points of Russian social media bots....and Donald Trump, himself.

You are nothing if not well-trained, Veritas.

But again, I'll begin to take you people seriously if ever you do something more than run your mouths on anonymous message boards. And that won't happen, will it, Veritas?

Consider that last question rhetorical. No need for you to answer. I think we understand one another.

 

[veritas1]

So, I guess the above details your prefabricated rationalizations for all of the fake-outrage we'll see from you in November, huh?

• The only way Biden can win is through massive fraud.
• ...millions and millions of unsolicitied mail ballots...flooding the system...
• The people want security and they want law and order.

These are, LITERALLY, the words and talking points of Russian social media bots....and Donald Trump, himself.

You are nothing if not well-trained, Veritas.

But again, I'll begin to take you people seriously if ever you do something more than run your mouths on anonymous message boards. And that won't happen, will it, Veritas?

Consider that last question rhetorical. No need for you to answer. I think we understand one another.

The Russia thing is a complete and total fraud. No sense even going there. It's all exposed now. Yes, people want security and law and order. Without it, there is no freedom. There's a reason that virtually every LE group in the nation endorses Trump. You may be willing to give up your freedom to get rid of one man. The rest of us are not. As for the election, it's clear that you'll cheer on ANY dirty scheme as long as you get power. That is the operating principle of the Democrat party and its minions.

 

[redbeer]

Very fine people, yes?

Do you have no shame in supporting more lies?

Trump, the Dem Media and the Charlottesville Lie | RealClearPolitics

The president of the United States, Donald Trump, never said there were

www.realclearpolitics.com

Biden Repeats Charlottesville Lie in Dishonest and Divisive DNC Acceptance Speech › American Greatness

Former Vice President Joe Biden formally accepted the Democratic Party’s nomination for president Thursday night in a deeply dishonest speech that repeated the Charlottesville lie.

amgreatness.com

The Left's Enduring Charlottesville Lie | News/Talk 1130 WISN | Dan O'Donnell

Dan O'Donnell disproves two years' worth of Democrat and media lies about President Trump and Charlottesville

newstalk1130.iheart.com

The Charlottesville Lie AlphaNews.org

Plainly put: ABC, CBS, NBC, NPR, the New York Times, the Washington Post and the others spread a malicious lie that has poisoned our national dialogue.

alphanewsmn.com

These are just for starters, as there are countless more, but I digress, because I know you are NOT interested in truth. The American People know your hearts and are seen as not good, for the left loves the lie, over the truth, loves rumor, gossip, and innuendo over civility and social responsibility. Truth does not reside in the left.

 

[lurchadams]

There's only one reason that Dems want massive mail in voting and we all know what it is. They seem to be fine with rioting but think going to a controlled environment like a polling place is somehow dangerous? Nobody buys that crap for a second. Without the pandemic, Trump would utterly destroy Biden. Even so, he will win, no matter how much China has tried to help Biden.

Typical trumpist fever dream. A polling place is not a "controlled environment" for people who don't want to die from a deadly virus. Mail-in voting has worked like a dream in my state for years and if it wasn't for you and your leader being afraid of losing fair and square you wouldn't be complaining about it.

 

[ElChupacabra]

I can't believe with all the highly-paid pundits on the airwaves, not one of them hit the key takeaway of the debates. Mashmont, sitting in his La-Z-Boy saw it within the first 30 seconds. I should get their salaries.

You held yourself in high estimation with your COVID 19 predictions and claimed you were better at the stats than the experts. Since that failed catastrophically, I think it's safe to assume you're probably wrong on this one too.

Here's the overriding point: No matter what you thought about Trump's decorum, aggressiveness, manners, whatever, the thing that immediately stood out was Biden's elderly, disconnected, befuddled, sedate mien. He seemed at least 20 years older than Trump. On the occasions when he didn't present like he was ready for his 11:00 a.m. nap, Biden came off like your senile grandpa railing against the paperboy. That's what America saw. It was obvious from the opening bell. Meaning, regardless what Biden said or did, it looked obvious to the American people that Biden would have no ability to handle the intricate, constant, exhausting job in the world, the presidency of the United States. Think about it, people. When the guy can't get out of his basement to do even ONE campaign stop, he has neither the energy nor mental acuity to to handle the job.

Biden's never been a great debater, on that I will not disagree. I do think some people saw what you described of his performance, but what will be harder to ignore is Trump's belligerence and inability to abide by the debate format. His thin skinned tendencies were apparent as well when he went on his "don't use the word smart around me"; deep down I think Trump knows he isn't as articulate and knowledgable as others which is why he always boasts about his intellect. The one example of this is his "I know the best words" statement. Anyone who has "the best words" would have found better ways to convey that.

Trump punished Biden like Trevor Berbick pounded the 40-year-old Muhammed Ali in his last fight. Except Biden was never an Ali. He was more like Joe Bugner. Trump got five shots in before Biden could gather nimself and respond to the first one. Rat-a-tat-tat. Biden was so distracted trying to fend of Trump's parries, he couldn't even finish a thought.

The problem with your assessment is it misses the fact Trump didn't do it in a meaningful way. He didn't beat Biden in some policy debate exchange, or by being witty. He simply interrupted with endless barrage of pointless attacks. It was clear Trump's approach was shock and awe, but without substance, none of his attacks really meant anything other than making him look like a bully.

So you have the worst most addled candidate in 100 years, and saddle him with the most extreme ridiculous agenda in the history of politics, highlighted (lowlighted) by defunding of the police and the $100 trillion Green New Deal, you pit him against an agile accomplished charismatic incumbent---and you get what we got. A dominant debate shellacking by President Trump

Again, if the only thing you took out of that exchange was Trump winning because excelled at interrupting, then it's clear you missed the bigger problem of him not having said anything other than ask repetitive questions and critique Biden's son for issues not relevant to the presidency. From a policy issue perspective I heard nothing about why Trump would be better choice, and from a personality aspect I saw a man who gets easily angered and impulsive; two characteristics I don't think go well for that level of leadership.

 

[noonereal]

The very fine people Trump was talking about were those in Charlottesville whose singular sincere goal was the preservation of Confederate statues and the heritage they represent. They understand the true goal of the radical left in tearing down these statues and those of the founding fathers is the erasure of Americana.

humor me, just what is the reason the radical left want to do this?