• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Daily Limbaugh: Obama is the "Very Danger the Constitution Was Designed to Avoid"

zimmer

Educating the Ignorant
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 19, 2008
Messages
24,380
Reaction score
7,805
Location
Worldwide
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
RUSH: Jonathan Turley was testifying Tuesday before a House Judiciary Committee on the constitutionality of some of Obama's uses of executive branch power. Now, this is important, because this is right.

Turley is a leftist "moderate," so he's at George Washington University law school, and Bob Goodlatte, Republican from Virginia, was questioning him, and he said, "Professor Turley, the Constitution, the system of separated powers, is not simply about stopping one branch of government from usurping another. It's about protecting the liberty of Americans from the dangers of concentrated government power.

"How does the president's unilateral modification of an act of Congress," meaning his willy-nilly granting of waivers, delaying implementation. All of these things he's doing with his own health care law are unconstitutional. He cannot do what he's doing, according to the Constitution. So Goodlatte is asking Turley here, a constitutional professor: How does the president's unilateral modification -- just acting willy-nilly, acting like a dictator, you know, pretending to play dictator -- affect the balance of power between the political branches and the liberty interests of the American people?

TURLEY: The danger is quite severe. The problem with what the president is doing is that he's not simply posing a danger to the constitutional system. He's becoming the very danger the Constitution was designed to avoid. We have what many once called an imperial presidency model.

Jonathan Turley: Obama is the "Very Danger the Constitution Was Designed to Avoid" - The Rush Limbaugh Show
Remember King George my Lib friends? You know... the guy Obama blamed for 4-years. Remember him? The guy you affectionately called King George?

Where are our Lib pals when we have someone doing real damage?

Where is the outrage? The concern? The defense of our Constitution? The honesty and though this doesn't compare remotely to Bush43... the CONSISTENCY?
 
Last edited:
Re: The Daily Limbaugh: Obama is the "Very Danger the Constitution Was Designed to Av

The Constitution or better yet the Bill of Rights was manifested to void tyranny/authoritarianism.

Obama certainly has a problem with our founding fathers ideas and is willing to "progress" into the hands of authoritarianism and government dictated social issues and economy.
 
Re: The Daily Limbaugh: Obama is the "Very Danger the Constitution Was Designed to Av

The POTUS is not what is making the Congress less relevant, there is a small obstructionist faction making it irrelevant.

Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University, told members of the committee that if one president unilaterally enforces laws, he will set a precedent for others to follow suit. He also said that with more federal agencies having increasing independence, and if the president’s power should expand, “Congress will be left like a Maginot Line on the constitutional landscape -- a sad relic of a once tripartite system of equal branches,” Turley said.

Turley later said, “This body is becoming less and less relevant.”

But Democrats fired back, claiming that if Congress is seen as irrelevant it is because members are wasting time with such hearings rather than legislating.


4 Outrageous GOP Claims Of What Could Happen If Obama Continues Ignoring Laws
 
Re: The Daily Limbaugh: Obama is the "Very Danger the Constitution Was Designed to Av

But Democrats fired back, claiming that if Congress is seen as irrelevant it is because members are wasting time with such hearings rather than legislating.


4 Outrageous GOP Claims Of What Could Happen If Obama Continues Ignoring Laws

They have legislated too much on things they have little business sticking their noses in. The best thing Congress can do is begin deconstructing the mess, holding Obama's feet to the fire, acting on the borders, illegal immigration and the military, and outside of that... take a long vacation.
 
Re: The Daily Limbaugh: Obama is the "Very Danger the Constitution Was Designed to Av

What? No interest in King Obama? King George surely was a pinata for the Left. Why the change of heart when we have a president actually doing damage?
 
Re: The Daily Limbaugh: Obama is the "Very Danger the Constitution Was Designed to Av

I'm very unconcerned about such a ridiculous characterization of what's happening. Sorry.
 
Re: The Daily Limbaugh: Obama is the "Very Danger the Constitution Was Designed to Av

See article.

The House Judiciary Committee on Tuesday sought to determine whether President Barack Obama acted within his rights by suspending or waiving portions of the nation’s laws, but it came up with no definitive examples of wrongdoing on the president's part.
 
Re: The Daily Limbaugh: Obama is the "Very Danger the Constitution Was Designed to Av

Remember King George my Lib friends? You know... the guy Obama blamed for 4-years. Remember him? The guy you affectionately called King George?

Where are our Lib pals when we have someone doing real damage?

Where is the outrage? The concern? The defense of our Constitution? The honesty and though this doesn't compare remotely to Bush43... the CONSISTENCY?

Translation: We allowed Congress to give George Bush a huge amount of power. Now Obama is reaping the benefits and taking it even further and we don't like it. But once another Republican is elected we probably will shut up about the expansion of power in the executive branch and even allow it to expand further. But oh boy will we bitch once a Democrat is elected to the presidency after that and we will probably insist his powers be reduced!


In other words, partisanship and Constitutional stewardship don't mix.
 
Back
Top Bottom