Please rephrase the question.
Seems he talked plenty. I know people want to hurt him and think this would provide different results, but evidence doesn't support that belief. There is not likely much more we could learn from him.
Seems he talked plenty.
I know people want to hurt him and think this would provide different results, but evidence doesn't support that belief.
There is not likely much more we could learn from him.
Submitting now that we've gathered intel you advocated collecting...what then? If it's actionable intel....such as there are training camps for terrorists here and this person is a terrorist operative, what then? What do you advocate once actionable intel is collected?
kill the people that need killing.
Fairly "brutal" don't you think?
No, they're terrorists.
I'm not some pansy assed liberal, I'm a US military veteran. Kill'em, let their friends bury them, if they can find the peices. Move on to the next target.
Coordinate with the governments in the relevant jurisdictions to act in either a military and/or law enforcement capacity, depending upon the circumstances.Submitting now that we've gathered intel you advocated collecting...what then? If it's actionable intel....such as there are training camps for terrorists here and this person is a terrorist operative, what then? What do you advocate once actionable intel is collected?
Won't know that until after he's waterboarded.
Coordinate with the governments in the relevant jurisdictions to act in either a military and/or law enforcement capacity, depending upon the circumstances.
Because we know that information obtained under duress is guaranteed to be accurate and actionable.
As far as I know ... ?That's what we've been doing, yes?
Because we know that information obtained under duress is guaranteed to be accurate and actionable.
:roll:
As far as I know ... ?
Um ... intelligence gathering doesn't typically involve brutality, despite what a few messageboard Rambos wish to believe.So, what's with the brutality only not working statement?
Um ... intelligence gathering doesn't typically involve brutality, despite what a few messageboard Rambos wish to believe.
Um ... intelligence gathering doesn't typically involve brutality, despite what a few messageboard Rambos wish to believe.
It depends upon the situation.Yeah but, what you do with your gathered intel does typically very much involve brutality. Don't it?
Because we know that information obtained under duress is guaranteed to be accurate and actionable.
:roll:
It depends upon the situation.
Um ... intelligence gathering doesn't typically involve brutality, despite what a few messageboard Rambos wish to believe.
Big ****ing difference.
The Irish have a loooooong history of good reason to hate the goddamned English, and none of it's grounded in religion.
The ****ing looney-toon terrorists are religious fanatics, and Osama's biggest complaint against the US was that Osama's uncles allowed the US to stage troops in Saudia Arabia, the so-called "holy land" of the terrorists.
The IRA were terrorists, but they could be bought.
The muslim fanatics can't be bought, so killing them is the only alternative.
Everyone wants to control the state for reasons of deeply felt religious and economic deprivations, and this desire permeates all aspects of everyday life. Religion may not be the root cause of Irish conflict, but it is definitely the fuel that flames the passions.
What is the main cause of all the trouble in Northern Ireland? Is religion a big part of it?
The conflict in Northern Ireland is usually explained in terms of the different constitutional aspirations of the two main sections of the community in the region. Many Catholics consider themselves to be Irish and are Nationalist in political outlook, that is, they would like to see the whole (nation) island of Ireland reunited (and independent of Britain). Most Protestants consider themselves to be British and are Unionist in political outlook, that is, they want Northern Ireland to remain part of the (union of the) United Kingdom (UK) of Britain (England, Scotland, and Wales) and Northern Ireland.
In the city of Belfast in Northern Ireland, 20 kilometres of wall known as the peace walls divide Protestant from Catholic.
True. Like I said, depends upon the situation.And depending on that situation, brutality is necessary and most importantly, effective. True?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?