• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The butt whacker turns out to be a youth minister and scout leader

See, here's where I differ from other men. I will not allow you to do the labeling. This was a trivial non-event. The man is not a misogynist. The misogynists are the ones who trivialize REAL sexual attacks by blowing this one out of proportion. So let's hope YOU don't be on some other misogynistic point in the future.

Label: "trivial non-event."
 
You people = people as a group, not necessarily you specifically.

OK. So you don't believe my wife and I talk. Big whoop.

Thanks for confessing you lied. "You people", maybe, but when you said "you're going to vote for him", that was a false accusation. Most sane, intelligent and educated people on this forum know I won't be voting for any of the Democrats up for President.

You said "I haven't said anything about you or myself' yet I proved you did both. You've mentioned yourself and your wife several times in this thread. Why did you feel the need to claim you didn't when it's obvious to anyone who looks?
 
Thanks for confessing you lied. "You people", maybe, but when you said "you're going to vote for him", that was a false accusation. Most sane, intelligent and educated people on this forum know I won't be voting for any of the Democrats up for President.

You said "I haven't said anything about you or myself' yet I proved you did both. You've mentioned yourself and your wife several times in this thread. Why did you feel the need to claim you didn't when it's obvious to anyone who looks?

The you are going to vote for him was a continuation of the the 'you people'.
Sounds like you're looking for a reason to gripe. Are you an old guy?.
 
OK, guys. Time to let my thread go. Thanks for bringing it up to nearly 700 posts, but I think I'll abandon it and let it die now. I've made my point.
 
The you are going to vote for him was a continuation of the the 'you people'.
Sounds like you're looking for a reason to gripe. Are you an old guy?.

Another false statement. I'm guessing your claims about Christianity are equally false.

Interesting you people have no problem with creepy Joe Biden putting his hands all over women and girls, clearly to their discomfort. He's done a thousand times worse than this guy ever did. If he's the nominee, you're going to vote for him.
 
OK, guys. Time to let my thread go. Thanks for bringing it up to nearly 700 posts, but I think I'll abandon it and let it die now. I've made my point.

/// "I'll abandon it and let it die now". I've made my point. /// Freud just smiled and did another 360. Mashmont loses yet another 'debate.'
 
Very sad to just read that the powers-that-be have caved in to the *MeToo advocates and arrested that man.

With all the violent crime committed by "children" and "young men," the power of the state is going to waste time and taxpayer money in order to ruin the life of a man who just committed a silly and spontaneous act.

So sad that the young lady did not have the kindness to insist that he not be charged. That would have been so classy.
 
Very sad to just read that the powers-that-be have caved in to the *MeToo advocates and arrested that man.

With all the violent crime committed by "children" and "young men," the power of the state is going to waste time and taxpayer money in order to ruin the life of a man who just committed a silly and spontaneous act.

So sad that the young lady did not have the kindness to insist that he not be charged. That would have been so classy.

Extremely well-said. When you're in this forum, you start to wonder if there are ANY sane people left.
 
Blah blah. I'm sick of the divisive hyperbolic blather. This guy acted on a whim. Made a mistake. I'm tired of repeating it. He's most likely just a guy doing the best he can, lots of energy, raising a family, working, and volunteering. It's absolutely ridiculous to vilify him over this. It should never have made the national news, and it probably wouldn't have, had the paid activist leftwing twitter trolls not pushed it. Those people are horrible.

Why is acting on a whim a defense to you? Good men don't touch women without their consent, whim or no. Real good men have control over their whims.
 
OK, guys. Time to let my thread go. Thanks for bringing it up to nearly 700 posts, but I think I'll abandon it and let it die now. I've made my point.

/// "I'll abandon it and let it die now". I've made my point. /// Freud just smiled and did another 360. Mashmont loses yet another 'debate.'


... also, it was my thread ... which he predictably took over and made all about his passionate defense of the right of "Christian" men to hit women without negative consequence.
 
... also, it was my thread ... which he predictably took over and made all about his passionate defense of the right of "Christian" men to hit women without negative consequence.

Oh, I thought you said you were 'done' with this thread and bowed out like three times.
 
Oh, I thought you said you were 'done' with this thread and bowed out like three times.

Um ... I thought you had decided it was time to abandon this thread now that you've made over 200 posts in it trying to convince decent people that down is up and that the people in the wrong are those who are standing up for a woman's right not to be smacked around by strangers.

Tough crap for you and that "Christian man" and the rest of you dinosaurs who are mourning the end of the good old days when it was good clean fun to hit women.
 
Um ... I thought you had decided it was time to abandon this thread now that you've made over 200 posts in it trying to convince decent people that down is up and that the people in the wrong are those who are standing up for a woman's right not to be smacked around by strangers.

Tough crap for you and that "Christian man" and the rest of you dinosaurs who are mourning the end of the good old days when it was good clean fun to hit women.

Well, I just saw where my thread had picked up, and I came back to see what it was all about.
 
Well, I just saw where my thread had picked up, and I came back to see what it was all about.

It's about how that man has now been charged for his crime because not even in Georgia are they looking the other way when men are stupid enough to commit their crimes on live TV.

And of course you are still here because you are obsessed with the heinous people who are holding "good Christian" men accountable for abusing women.
 
It's about how that man has now been charged for his crime because not even in Georgia are they looking the other way when men are stupid enough to commit their crimes on live TV.

And of course you are still here because you are obsessed with the heinous people who are holding "good Christian" men accountable for abusing women.

No, I'm here as a voice against the misogynists who trivialize real sex assault cases by blowing up trivial acts like this.

Haven't seen your thread condemning the black teen who stabbed a college freshman to death in New York City. Why not? That's quite a bit worse, isn't it?

Instead, you start a thread on this silly stuff.
 
No, I'm here as a voice against the misogynists who trivialize real sex assault cases by blowing up trivial acts like this.

Haven't seen your thread condemning the black teen who stabbed a college freshman to death in New York City. Why not? That's quite a bit worse, isn't it?

Instead, you start a thread on this silly stuff.

Nice try, but everyone can see you are trivializing a case of sexual battery against a woman.

Your attempt to derail about a stabbing is an example of you saying this attack on the woman is nothing and should be considered normal behavior.
 
Nice try, but everyone can see you are trivializing a case of sexual battery against a woman.

Your attempt to derail about a stabbing is an example of you saying this attack on the woman is nothing and should be considered normal behavior.

Normal behavior for good "Christian" men, fathers of daughters, men who are considered pillars of their community.

The man needs to take his legal hand slap. That would be the Christian thing to do.
 
Normal behavior for good "Christian" men, fathers of daughters, men who are considered pillars of their community.

The man needs to take his legal hand slap. That would be the Christian thing to do.

Pop quiz:
1) Who have the leftwingers on this forum criticized more often and more harshly?: a) the black teenager who slashed and murderd the Barnard College girl? or b) Tommy Calloway who slapped a reporter girl's raincoat ?

2) Who have the leftwingers on this forum criticized more often and more harshly? a) the black teenager who slashed and murdered the Barnard College girl? or b) young teenager Josh Duggar who once touched his sisters through their clothes in their sleep without waking them up?
 
Nice try, but everyone can see you are trivializing a case of sexual battery against a woman.

Your attempt to derail about a stabbing is an example of you saying this attack on the woman is nothing and should be considered normal behavior.

Everyone can see you are blowing the incident way out of proportion by claiming "sexual battery",

If anything you are trivializing women who are actually battered by someone.
 
Everyone can see you are blowing the incident way out of proportion by claiming "sexual battery",

If anything you are trivializing women who are actually battered by someone.

This fits the definition of sexual battery. That you can't emotional accept that is irrelevant to it's reality.

You should really learn words.
 
Pop quiz:
1) Who have the leftwingers on this forum criticized more often and more harshly?: a) the black teenager who slashed and murderd the Barnard College girl? or b) Tommy Calloway who slapped a reporter girl's raincoat ?

2) Who have the leftwingers on this forum criticized more often and more harshly? a) the black teenager who slashed and murdered the Barnard College girl? or b) young teenager Josh Duggar who once touched his sisters through their clothes in their sleep without waking them up?


Quickly moving past that fact that this is not all that Josh Duggar did, I'll just point out that I have not seen any leftwingers say that murdering someone is "all in good fun" like you said about the crime committed against the reporter.


And with that, I won't leave my thread, but I will stop talking to you. Your support of the abuse of women and your opposition to holding "Christians" accountable will always generate outrage from decent people, so you will keep getting the attention that you crave. But you won't get any more from me.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom