https://www.jw.org/en/library/magazines/watchtower-no4-2016-july/bible-changed-or-tampered/THE THREAT: External threats such as decay and opposition have not destroyed the Bible. Yet, some copyists and translators have attempted to alter the Bible’s message. At times, they have tried to make the Bible conform to their doctrines rather than conform their doctrines to the Bible. Consider some examples:
HOW THE BIBLE SURVIVED: First, although some Bible copyists were careless or even deceitful, many others were highly skilled and meticulous. Between the sixth and tenth centuries C.E., the Masoretes copied the Hebrew Scriptures and produced what is known as the Masoretic text. They reportedly counted the words and the letters to verify that no mistakes crept in. Where they suspected errors in the master text they were using, they noted these in the margin. The Masoretes refused to tamper with the Bible text. “Interfering with it purposely,” wrote Professor Moshe Goshen-Gottstein, “would have been for them the worst crime possible.”
Second, the sheer volume of manuscripts today actually helps Bible scholars to spot errors. For example, religious leaders taught for centuries that their Latin versions contained the authentic Bible text. Yet, at 1 John 5:7, they had inserted the spurious words referred to earlier in this article. The error even crept into the influential English King James Version! But when other manuscripts were discovered, what did they reveal? Bruce Metzger wrote: “The passage [at 1 John 5:7] is absent from the manuscripts of all ancient versions (Syriac, Coptic, Armenian, Ethiopic, Arabic, Slavonic), except the Latin.” As a result, revised editions of the King James Version and other Bibles have removed the erroneous phrase.
Do older manuscripts prove that the Bible’s message has been preserved? When the Dead Sea Scrolls were found in 1947, scholars could at last compare the Hebrew Masoretic text to what appeared in Bible scrolls that had been written more than a thousand years earlier. A member of the editorial team of the Dead Sea Scrolls concluded that one scroll “provides irrefutable proof that the transmission of the biblical text through a period of more than one thousand years by the hands of Jewish copyists has been extremely faithful and careful.”
The Chester Beatty Library in Dublin, Ireland, features a collection of papyri that represents nearly every book of the Christian Greek Scriptures, including manuscripts dating from the second century C.E.—only about 100 years after the Bible was completed. “Although the Papyri supply a wealth of new information on textual detail,” The Anchor Bible Dictionary observes, “they also demonstrate remarkable stability in the transmission history of the biblical text.”
“It may be safely said that no other work of antiquity has been so accurately transmitted”
THE RESULT: Rather than corrupting the Bible text, the age and multitude of Bible manuscripts have actually improved it. “No other ancient book has anything like such early and plentiful testimony to its text,” wrote Sir Frederic Kenyon about the Christian Greek Scriptures, “and no unbiased scholar would deny that the text that has come down to us is substantially sound.” And regarding the Hebrew Scriptures, scholar William Henry Green stated: “It may be safely said that no other work of antiquity has been so accurately transmitted.”
Do you have any idea how many versions of the bible there are since the 500CE? The fact that you think that your JW version is correct despite there being more than 50 other versions that are equally correct or incorrect is an example of confirmation bias.
One of the reasons we see different versions of the Bible is because of the number of manuscripts available. There are over 5,800 Greek New Testament manuscripts known to date, along with over 10,000 Hebrew Old Testament manuscripts and over 19,000 copies in Syriac, Coptic, Latin, and Aramaic languages.
lol...do you realize the article is not about my version of the Bible but ALL versions...obviously you don't because obviously you didn't read it...Do you have any idea how many versions of the bible there are since the 500CE? The fact that you think that your JW version is correct despite there being more than 50 other versions that are equally correct or incorrect is an example of confirmation bias.
Why Are There So Many Different Versions of the Bible?
One of the reasons we see different versions of the Bible is because of the number of manuscripts available. Another reason is because over time the English language has changed dramatically. English speakers have been blessed with many translations and versions of the full Bible. But what about...www.christianity.com
The message of the Bible has been very altered by the various Christian sects. Not even the 4 gospels are the same. The Catholic vs the protestant version is very different.lol...do you realize the article is not about my version of the Bible but ALL versions...obviously you don't because obviously you didn't read it...
Again...this thread is NOT about my version...Do you have any idea how many versions of the bible there are since the 500CE? The fact that you think that your JW version is correct despite there being more than 50 other versions that are equally correct or incorrect is an example of confirmation bias.
Why Are There So Many Different Versions of the Bible?
One of the reasons we see different versions of the Bible is because of the number of manuscripts available. Another reason is because over time the English language has changed dramatically. English speakers have been blessed with many translations and versions of the full Bible. But what about...www.christianity.com
It shouldn't matter if it was altered here or there, it's not infallible to begin with.Considering we have zero original manuscripts, there’s no way to know how much it has been altered.
The Bible Survived Attempts to Alter Its Message...
How would you know that? How could anyone?
The main message in the Bible has remained the same. I'm talking about the reputable, mainstream ones that are used by scholars.
UNLESS we're talking of cults and other kinds of "bibles" - like the Jehovah' Witnesses Bible (NWT) - that had blatantly made changes to tailor it to the message they want to preach.
#2 Trinity (Triune God)
#3 JW changes phrase of Genesis 1
#4 False Teaching: Soul Dies With Physical Body; Adam and Eve
#5 Continuation Soul Dies With Physical Body; Jesus is God (Omnipresence)
#13 “Believing In Jesus Christ” – what it means
#18 JW changes John 1:1 and contradicts Isaiah 43:10
#21 Why is it dangerous?
# 24 Wasn't Jesus called a leader of a cult?/Comparison to altering Harry Potter
#27, 28, 29, 30 Jesus Is The Archangel Michael
#40 Why don't JW celebrate Christmas?
#40 Continuation Jesus is the Archangel Michael
#41, 42, 43 Why Don't Jehovah's Witnesses Celebrate Christmas?
#44 Addendum: Jesus Christ Is The Archangel Michael
#45 Article (9 Things You Should Know About JW) – thanks to LittleNipper
#46 10 Questions To Ask a JW (thanks to LittleNipper)
#50 Video – JW misquoting Greek scholar, Julius Mantey
#51 Explanation of the Spirit (thanks to Logicman)
#57 Challenge Question repeated to Elora (which has been avoided in another thread).
#58 Rebuttal
#61, 65, 66 No Bodily Resurrection
#71 Rebuttal of LittleNipper to JW
The False Teachings Of The Jehovah's Witnesses
The organization that calls itself, “Jehovah's Witnesses,” is just one among many religions that teach false teachings, and would not have merited an in-depth topic about it .....however, it is one of the most actively tenacious proselytizers, using the name of Christianity. In that regard, it...debatepolitics.com
What's interesting is that the truth can be found, regardless of what translation of the Bible is used...the problem with some people's interpretations is they fail to follow the guidelines of accurate understanding...one must gather together all the scriptures germane to the subject being discussed...context must also be considered...then and only then, when all the scriptures on any given matter are in harmony with one another, have you arrived at the correct understanding...for example...the trinity...
Trinitarians rely basically on John 1:1, John 10:30, and Matthew 28:19 to support their doctrine but ignore all the other numerous scriptures which support the fact that the Father and Son are 2 separate beings...even John 10:30, they fail to consider the context...Jesus was talking about the 2 being one in union, with the same goals in mind, not the same being...that belief is in direct contradiction to what Jesus said...when interpreted correctly, no 2 scriptures are in contradiction with one another...
What's interesting is that the truth can be found, regardless of what translation of the Bible is used...the problem with some people's interpretations is they fail to follow the guidelines of accurate understanding...one must gather together all the scriptures germane to the subject being discussed...context must also be considered...then and only then, when all the scriptures on any given matter are in harmony with one another, have you arrived at the correct understanding...for example...the trinity...
Trinitarians rely basically on John 1:1, John 10:30, and Matthew 28:19 to support their doctrine but ignore all the other numerous scriptures which support the fact that the Father and Son are 2 separate beings...even John 10:30, they fail to consider the context...Jesus was talking about the 2 being one in union, with the same goals in mind, not the same being...that belief is in direct contradiction to what Jesus said...when interpreted correctly, no 2 scriptures are in contradiction with one another...
Not 100% true.. When older copies of a book are missing what later copies have, it can be concluded that the suddenly appearing verse had been addedOnce again: there are no original copies of any of the books of the Bible. We have no way of knowing how they may have been altered.
Believing they haven't been altered is a position based entirely on faith, not evidence.
Not 100% true.. When older copies of a book are missing what later copies have, it can be concluded that the suddenly appearing verse had been added
Yet , we can be sure that mark 16:9-20 was added laterThe earliest copies of any Biblical texts we have are fragmentary pieces written many decades after the originals.
What is interesting is that the JW's insist that the BIble has resisted the altering of it's message,
However, the message that the JW's claim the bible says is different that the message that the Catholics say it says, and it's different than the message the Prostestants say it says.
What's interesting is that the truth can be found, regardless of what translation of the Bible is used...the problem with some people's interpretations is they fail to follow the guidelines of accurate understanding...one must gather together all the scriptures germane to the subject being discussed...context must also be considered...then and only then, when all the scriptures on any given matter are in harmony with one another, have you arrived at the correct understanding...for example...the trinity...
What's interesting is that the truth can be found, regardless of what translation of the Bible is used...the problem with some people's interpretations is they fail to follow the guidelines of accurate understanding...one must gather together all the scriptures germane to the subject being discussed...context must also be considered...then and only then, when all the scriptures on any given matter are in harmony with one another, have you arrived at the correct understanding...for example...the trinity...
Trinitarians rely basically on John 1:1, John 10:30, and Matthew 28:19 to support their doctrine but ignore all the other numerous scriptures which support the fact that the Father and Son are 2 separate beings...even John 10:30, they fail to consider the context...Jesus was talking about the 2 being one in union, with the same goals in mind, not the same being...that belief is in direct contradiction to what Jesus said...when interpreted correctly, no 2 scriptures are in contradiction with one another...
What's interesting is that the truth can be found, regardless of what translation of the Bible is used...the problem with some people's interpretations is they fail to follow the guidelines of accurate understanding...one must gather together all the scriptures germane to the subject being discussed...context must also be considered...then and only then, when all the scriptures on any given matter are in harmony with one another, have you arrived at the correct understanding...for example...the trinity...
Trinitarians rely basically on John 1:1, John 10:30, and Matthew 28:19 to support their doctrine but ignore all the other numerous scriptures which support the fact that the Father and Son are 2 separate beings...even John 10:30, they fail to consider the context...Jesus was talking about the 2 being one in union, with the same goals in mind, not the same being...that belief is in direct contradiction to what Jesus said...when interpreted correctly, no 2 scriptures are in contradiction with one another...
Trinitarians rely basically on John 1:1, John 10:30, and Matthew 28:19 to support their doctrine but ignore all the other numerous scriptures which support the fact that the Father and Son are 2 separate beings.
Yet, we arrived at our beliefs from studying the KJV...go figure...he JW translation isn't in harmony with a lot of verses.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?