At least police can still verify the legal status of those they pull over for traffic offense.
That provision, requiring police to conduct immigration checks on individuals they arrest or merely stop for questioning whom they suspect are in the U.S. illegally,
If you REALLY wanted to end the "cheap foreign labor" profits you would CUT all federal aid to the states for illegal aliens. The federal gov't MANDATES that the states educate (the children of) illegal aliens and pays them to do it while it leaves the border open. Stop that education aid and the states would help turn off the jobs magnet as they would then bear these HUGE costs. As long as the federal gov't bears the costs and the state gets the benefits, illegal immigration will never end. The illegal immigration magnet is FEDERALLY subsidized, making it not a state cost.
I understand why this was upheld owing to the basis on which it was challenged. It will have to go into effect in order to be challenged fully, so I won't argue the merits of the ruling today.
I have a huge problem with this:
Read more: Arizona immigration ruling: High court strikes down much of Arizona immigration law - POLITICO.com
So my Hispanic looking relatives, who were born here, can be harassed for doing nothing more than looking Hispanic. That's a barnyard substance.
Stopping education aid does nothing about the job magnet. Yanking employer licenses would.
Which means it's useless.
AZ Republican Senators and governor knew this would happen, they want to keep their cheap foreign labor profits flowing into their pockets.
The DOJ objects to that. They tried to block the provision of the law going after employers.
Well you know the Governor gets 10% right off the top, right? :roll:
I understand why this was upheld owing to the basis on which it was challenged. It will have to go into effect in order to be challenged fully, so I won't argue the merits of the ruling today.
I have a huge problem with this:
Read more: Arizona immigration ruling: High court strikes down much of Arizona immigration law - POLITICO.com
So my Hispanic looking relatives, who were born here, can be harassed for doing nothing more than looking Hispanic. That's a barnyard substance.
All you really need is #3.
I bet if you looked at her portfolio you'd see Chinese slave labor and/or Immigrant slave labor.
So a cop asking for a white's driver's license is harassment? cool
That provision, requiring police to conduct immigration checks on individuals they arrest or merely stop for questioning whom they suspect are in the U.S. illegally,
They can check other things if they stop you, so how do you have a problem with this?
At least police can still verify the legal status of those they pull over for traffic offense.Hopefully Arizona goes back to the drawing board for other ideas on cracking down on illegal immigration. I would like to see these ideas implemented.
1.Mandate E-verify.
If they legitimately stop someone for doing something suspicious, they don't need this law.
This law says the police can stop them merely for suspecting they are in the country illegally.
There are apparently some flaws with E-verify. We had a guy working for my company who passed E-verify and several job-specific background checks (one of them even included finger printing). We had to terminate him and he applied for unemployment. Based on the investigation of our claims and the state's investigation of the employee, it was determined that our reasons were valid and, even if they weren't, he didn't qualify for unemployment because he did not have legal residency status.
Makes me wonder how he passed E-verify and all those background checks without flagging the system, yet the state was somehow able to make the determination on his work status.
If you're an Arizona cop, how many latinos do you deal with on a daily basis? How many Arizona cops are latino? Ultimately there is and must be some discretion left to the police officers. And this already exists for other aspects of law. If I'm fishing on a river, the game warden has a right to ask for my fishing license. So when I show him, is it okay for me to charge the warden with harrassment or profiling?
So we improve upon e-verify, right?
There are apparently some flaws with E-verify. We had a guy working for my company who passed E-verify and several job-specific background checks (one of them even included finger printing). We had to terminate him and he applied for unemployment. Based on the investigation of our claims and the state's investigation of the employee, it was determined that our reasons were valid and, even if they weren't, he didn't qualify for unemployment because he did not have legal residency status.
Makes me wonder how he passed E-verify and all those background checks without flagging the system, yet the state was somehow able to make the determination on his work status.
So we improve upon e-verify, right?
Maybe the state checked other things like his ID and other information.
Maybe it is profiling .. in this case, target/suspect/pepetrator profiling.Of course it's not profiling. You're fishing, you need to have a license.
My Hispanic looking relatives could be doing anything, walking or driving down a street for instance, and be stopped and harassed for merely being suspected of being illegal. As a white person, I don't have to worry about that. That's profiling.
Could be that they are simply following the information and training given BY Federal Immigration agencies TO State and Local law enforcement agencies.That has nothing to do with it, they are being stopped and questioned because they are suspected of being in the U.S. illegally.
That stop is made based on how they look, yes? A white driver won't be stopped under these circumstances, or at least it's highly unlikely.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?