No, punishing law abiding citizens for the actions of criminals, while doing nothing to improve public safety. In fact, damaging it. THAT'S, gun grabber nonsense.
Uh, that was just in that article.
But, you don't care right? As long as you can have any gun you want - it's okay.
Don't know but all the more reason for law abiding folks to have their own.....because......................the police CANNOT protect you...they never could. Police protection is an oxymoron.
I count 10 holes.......a guy could do that with many types of guns.
Do you really think making them illegal will get them off the street and prevent gangs from acquiring them? Hilariously asinine! :roll:
If you want to convince me that AR-15's, or "assault weapons" in general, are a significant cause of death and mayhem in this country, that article was a poor choice then, wasn't it?
A better article would have said something like "according to FBI statistics/statements/study by yadda yadda, assault rifles have been used in ____ mass shootings since (insert some date)"
But yeah. Just want all the guns. That's me alright, eh guys?
Denial noted.
None of those people would have been injured if the guy had a billy club.
The man got off 212 rounds. When was the last time 212 bludgeonings took place? 'bout - what, 1413 A.D.? Something like that?
How about an answer to the point rather than a run-around.
Denial noted.
So, we've all been reading about this latest Huston shooting shooting, and this is exactly why such weapons should not be in the streets:
Houston Shooter Fired 212 Rounds, Outgunned Police With America's Favorite Rifle
Here's what he was able to do to just a cop winshield:
View attachment 67202116
How many gangs around the country have these things, or Mac 9s etc?
So a guy with an AR ratta-tat-tating, killing and injuring people on the street is "gun grabber nonsense".
Uh, that was just in that article.
But, you don't care right? As long as you can have any gun you want - it's okay.
We're not talking about punishing anybody except innocent people trying to go about their day, but instead getting gunned down by a guy with an AR and over 200 rounds.
That's the topic. Now - what about the topic?
No, we've always had sick people. The real problem is the guns that these people can get, or the criminal element, to do mayhem with. This is just yet - another example.
You are making an assertion and the burden is upon you to support it with evidence. You showed me an article that mentioned four mass shootings. I agree entirely that there are more than four in history.
How many more mass shootings am I supposed to infer from this article you mentioned? A dozen? A hundred? A thousand?
Wow looking at the photo that guy clearly must have failed rifle qual. Seriously the ar15 is no more dangerous than a ruger mini 14, or any semi auto rifle. If he is an army vet I am both sad yet happy he is such a terrible shot, sad because even the worst army shooters know how to aim with one of those, and know not to spray, glad because in this case the deathtoll was vastly lower than it could have been, due to his terrible marksmenship.
it is another example of 2 or 3% if that of the population doing something that the other 99% don't do.
congrats.
Denial noted.
None of those people would have been injured if the guy had a billy club.
The man got off 212 rounds. When was the last time 212 bludgeonings took place? 'bout - what, 1413 A.D.? Something like that?
How about an answer to the point rather than a run-around.
More denial.
Fascinating.
So, we've all been reading about this latest Huston shooting shooting, and this is exactly why such weapons should not be in the streets:
Houston Shooter Fired 212 Rounds, Outgunned Police With America's Favorite Rifle
Here's what he was able to do to just a cop winshield:
View attachment 67202116
How many gangs around the country have these things, or Mac 9s etc?
it is another example of 2 or 3% if that of the population doing something that the other 99% don't do.
congrats.
So people with 100s of rounds of ammo and four or five 30 round clips out hunting innocents and killing and maiming them is not a problem.
More denial.
Fascinating.
So people with 100s of rounds of ammo and four or five 30 round clips out hunting innocents and killing and maiming them is not a problem.
Less than 1% actually
it is another example of 2 or 3% if that of the population doing something that the other 98% don't do.
congrats.
Take your pick.
Do you agree that such shootings and the weapons that have been used create a problem for the general public?
More denial.
Fascinating.
and yet instead of addressing that most people don't do this you come up with a logical fallacy.
most people don't hunt innocent people. in fact the vast majority of people don't do this.
so you are taking outliers and condemning the rest of people.
So people with 100s of rounds of ammo and four or five 30 round clips out hunting innocents and killing and maiming them is not a problem.
Annnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnd how many hit?
Denial of what, that the guy is a terrible shot who probably got laughed at constantly in the army, or that the ar is no more dangerous than any other semi auto.
I'll tell you what, go to a range and rent an ar, and point at a target and squeeze the trigger as fast as you can, bet you will not hit the broad side of a barn, because spraying bullets is a waste, and ineffective, which is why the military, police, etc not only do not do that, they literally train their guys not to and instead aim.
Take your pick.
Do you agree that such shootings and the weapons that have been used create a problem for the general public?
Less than 1% actually
No more a problem than someone raping a coed or beating their kid in a drunken stupor. Actually happens less. So no. Not a problem.
Not denial. It is recognition of the fact that this asshat does not represent the experiences of tens of millions of AR owners who do not present a danger to anyone. As a matter of fact, it is your failure to wrap your bigoted mind around that fact that represents actual denial as well as pure ignorance of reality. Get over it.
and yet instead of addressing that most people don't do this you come up with a logical fallacy.
most people don't hunt innocent people. in fact the vast majority of people don't do this.
so you are taking outliers and condemning the rest of people.
He is not an moron, but he certainly holds some moronic opinions.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?