There is nothing else to say.
Except this:
Question:
If my thread was inspired by Sherlock’s, why should it be restricted to only his comments and context?
Can it encompass more?
Of course, the honest answer is simple: “It’s your thread, make it whatever you want.”
Let’s start with the obvious. Sherlock’s thread was dishonest, disingenuous, and false on every level. His title, the OP, and everything he posted with regards to any rebuttal of his OP was flat-out condescending and/or just plain ignorant. The very definition of “false premise”.
So, I decided to take his false narrative, and make it an actual avenue for real and honest discussion/debate.
I never intended, wanted, or expected to have this thread be solely, strictly, and rigidly confined to anything specific Sherlock said or posted about in his OP. His comments (thread title) “inspired” this thread, but that’s where it stops.
My thread is open to any question, from any DP member, to any non-believer, agnostic, or atheist.
The fact that Sherlock’s thread made fallacious claims against atheists and nobody else, has no bearing on whether I should, should not, can, or can’t include agnostics and non-believers in my thread. Why should it?
I see no reason to exclude them from an open debate/discussion.
Sherlock was never the singular target for this thread. I did not quote him in the OP just for that reason.
The target of this thread was ANYONE who has/had the same mindset as Sherlock.
The only questions left unanswered in this thread is why someone can’t understand such a very simple, clear, and legitimate OP?
Since that person isn’t an atheist I guess that answer will have to wait for another day. Or, perhaps we all know the answer.