BirdinHand
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
- Messages
- 47,318
- Reaction score
- 88,135
- Gender
- Female
So, again, it comes back to a need to control women.if there isn't a living unborn, there is no pregnancy ... "potential" has nothing to do with it
making a decision to have a living unborn killed - without the man having any say in it
many states/people have said no, that's not how a progressive society respecting life does things and we're stopping it
we can value both you know - its not one or the other
your side wants no responsibility in the choices of having sex, just have the unborn killed and done
I can see that. To me, a woman chooses sex, creates a human life, there is a responsibility (10 months) to have that child and not have it killed . The man IMO should be responsible (at the very least) for 18 years all financial obligations for the child including insurance etc
No more, no less.