- Joined
- Jul 4, 2011
- Messages
- 33,022
- Reaction score
- 14,666
- Location
- Near Seattle
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
[FONT="]The woman killed by police after she fatally shot her two daughters at their Texas home was identified as an outspoken gun advocate.[/FONT]
[FONT="]Christy Sheats, 42, shot and killed her two young daughters, Taylor, 22, and Madison Sheats, 17, on what neighbors said was their father’s birthday, according to local reports. A family spat started inside the married couple’s Houston-area home and spiraled into gun violence that spilled out onto their street.[/FONT]
[FONT="]“It was a family argument that turned into a shooting,” Fort Bend County Sheriff Troy Nehls told the Houston Chronicle. “But we’re still trying to put the pieces together.”[/FONT]
[FONT="]A witness said the sisters tried escaping with their father, but Taylor collapsed outside the home and Madison was shot in the back,[/FONT]
I think it is fairly safe to say that Christy Sheats madness is ended!Texas mom, gun advocate, killed by cops after shooting daughters - NY Daily News
Let the madness end. There must be a way.
Solve for madness. You have the proper concept correct, now capitalize on the thought.Texas mom, gun advocate, killed by cops after shooting daughters - NY Daily News
Let the madness end. There must be a way.
Just another routine gun nut killing, nothing unusual here, move along!
what a goddamn awful evil woman, I am an atheist so I do not believe in hell but in cases like this I would hope there is one so this evil DOB can burn in hell (daughter of a bitch).
I don't think the madness of vilifying gun owners or their supporters by the left will end until they can respect disagreements and honor the fact that many Americans want to protect their constitutional rights.
Texas mom, gun advocate, killed by cops after shooting daughters - NY Daily News
Let the madness end. There must be a way.
I think there are many people like myself that aren't interested in taking away your guns. I am in favor of common sense measures that allow for mandatory licensing. My position is reasonably simple. If you need a license to operate a deadly vehicle and a test to be able to drive, then it is reasonable to expect a person to demonstrate they know how to operate and store a deadly weapon.
I realize this will immediately rankle many here including our resident testudine, but on some level, SOMETHING has to change. The definition of insanity applies here.
There are other mitigating factors it appears in this case. Her state of mind obviously
Would that have prevented this crime? Probably not. Would it prevent other crimes and save lives? The reasonable answer is yes.
As to assault weapons, even Ronnie was against them. They are designed for a single purpose. Hardly something one needs lying around.
Isn't mental illness and gun ownership one of the major issues that people want addressed?She may have had mental health issues. Christy Sheats: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com
I don't think the madness of vilifying gun owners or their supporters by the left will end until they can respect disagreements and honor the fact that many Americans want to protect their constitutional rights.
Not an evil woman, just a sick one. From what I could tell from the article Nota Bene posted, the woman was mentally ill. My unprofessional guess is, she was a paranoid schizophrenic who thought she was fighting off intruders, probably believing them to be threats to her daughters. Her social media suggested an obsession with their safety.
I disagree, if you slaughter your children you are evil and should burn in hell.
1. There's no Constitutional right to drive a car.
2. "Assault Weapons" can be used to hunt, target shoot, etc. Just like every other gun.
I think there are many people like myself that aren't interested in taking away your guns. I am in favor of common sense measures that allow for mandatory licensing. My position is reasonably simple. If you need a license to operate a deadly vehicle and a test to be able to drive, then it is reasonable to expect a person to demonstrate they know how to operate and store a deadly weapon.
I realize this will immediately rankle many here including our resident testudine, but on some level, SOMETHING has to change. The definition of insanity applies here.
There are other mitigating factors it appears in this case. Her state of mind obviously
Would that have prevented this crime? Probably not. Would it prevent other crimes and save lives? The reasonable answer is yes.
As to assault weapons, even Ronnie was against them. They are designed for a single purpose. Hardly something one needs lying around.
1. There's no Constitutional right to drive a car.
2. "Assault Weapons" can be used to hunt, target shoot, etc. Just like every other gun.
Shooting down balloons is child's play. No pun intended.
Serious problems take serious solutions. That means give and take. No one is threatened by safety measures.
One thing is certain, if something doesn't change it's illogical to assume the situation will.
He cannot even define what an assault weapon is--the Bannerrhoids in californa wrote an AW ban that included 3000 dollar 5 shot (with no higher round magazine available) target pistols that were purpose built for the event called Olympic rapid fire pistol.
I don't mean to generalize(okay maybe I do), but every time I come into a gun thread and see someone with a lean of "Liberal" it generally means they have no idea what they are talking about. This is simply another case of that.
how is mandatory licensing going to have a "commons sense" reduction of crime when criminals cannot own any firearm
You feel change is needed but you cannot establish the CHANGE you want will do any good.
and you ARE either ignorant or telling a lie when you claim that "assault weapons" (whatever that means-I bet you cannot understand that what makes something an assault weapon are cosmetic features that have no relevance to crime) only have one purpose
Ronnie was senile when he said that
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?