1, all kinds of religions will disappear.
2, marriages and families will disappear.
3, the elderly unemployed for a long time will be eliminated.
4, power of tall males and strong males will decline greatly.
5, public ownership based on democracy will appear.
6, English will be greatly simplified.
7, disorderly calendar, clock sequence and "QWERTY" keyboard will be improved.
8, most teaching activities will be done at internet schools.
9, collision laws will bring science revolution and molecular foods will bring technology revolution.
10, the earth federation will appear.
In brief (because I'm not going to expect you to read anything like as much as you gave us!);
1) I don't see this happening. While there is a move away from literal theistic beliefs, there are a growing number of religions, both those with a less literal theistic basis and those entirely non-theistic (Scientology being a major example). People won't loose what drives them towards religion so I see no reason why religion, in some form, won't continue indefinitely.
2) Marriage may continue to become less common and families less conventional but I think the basic concepts of a partner and general family structures will remain, basically because they work.
3) An aging population is a growing problem and there are a number of ways it could be addressed in the future. Better management of resources (and maybe lowered expectations), a shift in medical attitudes to keeping people healthy rather than keeping them alive and less aggressive population control would hopefully come in before anything as extreme as you suggest.
4) No more than they have already. For all our technology and knowledge economy, physical strength and size will always carry some benefit. Technology, however advanced, can only compensate so far.
5) I think we're going the opposite direction, with large corporations rather than government controlling large swathes of things. It's already the case today, to a much greater extent than most of us realise, certainly to enough of an extent to given them enough sway to see off any wide-spread push for nationalisation.
6) Again, I see this going in the opposite direction. With more and more people speaking English as a second language, there will be more (and more diverse) accents and dialects, diversifying the language, especially spoken. There might be an academic appeal in removing some of the languages oddities but I don't see it happening in practice.
7) I see no reason for doing this. We generally cope perfectly well with out calendars and clocks, having done so for hundreds of years. The complications of a transition to a different system would be infinitely more disruptive that any problems causes by the current one.
The QWERTY keyboard is just fine for actual keyboards - you've grossly over-simplified how typing works. There is an argument for different layouts for different devices but QWERTY retains the advantage of familiarity and basically works.
8) This is the only prediction I agree with, though I'm not convinced it's an entirely good thing. I think there are unique benefits from learning with someone in person, especially when learning more than raw facts by rote.
9) Your "collision theory" sounds like so much speculation and even if true, I see no reason why it would eliminate the basic mechanical laws we've observed. I can't see that impacting much of the daily life of the layman.
Artificial foods are certainly a viable prospect, though how much develop along the lines you describe is to be seen.
10) This is science-fantasy. I see no prospect in the foreseeable future for humans of the world to put aside our national, racial, religious or political differences to form any kinds of viable international organisation anywhere close to what you predict. It's a lovely idea (in a somewhat cold manner) but not at all likely.
