• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

TDS, a mental issue- MN. Senate File No. 2580

Stopped reading right there.
Obviously. MAGA read at most just the headlines. There is little evidence that MAGA read more than a sentence or two in a single sitting. This is why they keep posting links to articles that undermine their argument but whose clickbait headline suggested otherwise.

Don’t get me wrong, I sympathize. This is a tough situation for you. A thread popped up where one of your fellow soldiers offered a novel way to own the leftist filth, and it made you very, very excited for him and his strategy, so you jumped on board as a believer. Then he was outed as a pedophile, and now you’re stuck trying to figure out how to unentangle yourself from this pedophile while still owning the left. It’s not an easy situation for a MAGA to be in, but given the preponderance of pedophiles within MAGA, hopefully by now you’ve had some practice.
 
Obviously. MAGA read at most just the headlines. There is little evidence that MAGA read more than a sentence or two in a single sitting.
Naa. I just don't waste my time with the utter bullshit you seem to keep posting. Do better.

This is why they keep posting links to articles that undermine their argument but whose clickbait headline suggested otherwise.

Don’t get me wrong, I sympathize. This is a tough situation for you. A thread popped up where one of your fellow soldiers offered a novel way to own the leftist filth, and it made you very, very excited for him and his strategy, so you jumped on board as a believer. Then he was outed as a pedophile, and now you’re stuck trying to figure out how to unentangle yourself from this pedophile while still owning the left. It’s not an easy situation for a MAGA to be in, but given the preponderance of pedophiles within MAGA, hopefully by now you’ve had some practice.
 
Looks like this GOP lawmaker has some mental illness of his own besides Trump Defense Syndrome. :ROFLMAO:
imo, one should be careful on saying those who question President Trump have a mental illness when one has a problem of there own.


"GOP Sen. Justin Eichorn, 40, of Grand Rapids, was arrested Monday after detectives communicated with a man who was led to believe that he was talking to a 16-year-old girl, the department said in a news release. A detective arranged to meet with him, and he was arrested outside his vehicle without incident.


MAGA who said ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’ is a mental illness gets busted for soliciting teen​

 
Naa. I just don't waste my time with the utter bullshit you seem to keep posting. Do better.
Nah, you don’t read past the first sentence because MAGA struggle with… reading.

Obviously, we don’t expect you do to better.
 
I think it’s fair to say that @CharisRose and @eohrnberger will not be coming back to this thread after their most recent champion was outed as pedophile.
Hello, 👋 I’m back. So is eohrnberger.
Thanks for using a crystal ball 🔮 concerning the deliberate use of the word “champion” in the sentence ⬆️! Nice try to create a lie concerning what I think.

I think, human sexual predators especially a child predator are “the scum of the earth” and it is not based on an independent, 🫏 or 🐘 political party.


How about the current questioning concerning the use of the word pedophile in favor of MAP’s ~ “Minor Attracted Persons” I reject both.

Human Sexual Predators are the scum of the earth is by far the best description. Including the predator I was accused of thinking that predator to be a champion.

Thanks once again for a post I can 🤣 making my day!🎭
 
Hello, 👋 I’m back. So is eohrnberger.
Thanks for using a crystal ball 🔮 concerning the deliberate use of the word “champion” in the sentence ⬆️! Nice try to create a lie concerning what I think.

I think, human sexual predators especially a child predator are “the scum of the earth” and it is not based on an independent, 🫏 or 🐘 political party.


How about the current questioning concerning the use of the word pedophile in favor of MAP’s ~ “Minor Attracted Persons” I reject both.

Human Sexual Predators are the scum of the earth is by far the best description. Including the predator I was accused of thinking that predator to be a champion.

Thanks once again for a post I can 🤣 making my day!🎭
Are you saying that the MAGA who introduced a bill to legally declare TDS a mental illness is “scum of the earth” ?
 
So, once again, @trixare4kids owned herself.

So, once again, Trix simply provided a link to information concerning the subject of her thread. Followed by “Read and discuss: Should it be voted into law?”

Please provide exactly how the information linked ⬆️ resulted in the idea “owned herself” based on a current after the fact information being provided.

🔮 cannot read minds. 🔮 do not tell the future. Trix had no knowledge whatsoever prior to the link ⬆️ provided today when she started this thread.

Thanks once again! 🎭👏
 
So, once again, Trix simply provided a link to information concerning the subject of her thread. Followed by “Read and discuss: Should it be voted into law?”

Please provide exactly how the information linked ⬆️ resulted in the idea “owned herself” based on a current after the fact information being provided.

🔮 cannot read minds. 🔮 do not tell the future. Trix had no knowledge whatsoever prior to the link ⬆️ provided today when she started this thread.

Thanks once again! 🎭👏
So, once again, @trixare4kids started a thread hoping for a gotcha but ending with another face-plant.

It’s fascinating to see @CharisRose taking great pains to avoid acknowledging that this MAGA they were shilling for turned out to be a pedophile.
 
Are you saying that the MAGA who introduced a bill to legally declare TDS a mental illness is “scum of the earth” ?
Unfortunately I can’t currently. Citizens including political Representatives are considered to be “Innocent until Proven Guilty in A Court of Law”
After the Full Legal Process concludes. Found Guilty.

My answer would be Yes. But it won’t be based on a political or a MAGA basis. It will be based on him as a singular human sexual predator.
Sorry but I don’t think like Hillary Rodham Clinton putting every single American Citizen or Rival of the opposition party in a basket 🧺 using the word deplorable.
 
Obviously. MAGA read at most just the headlines. There is little evidence that MAGA read more than a sentence or two in a single sitting. This is why they keep posting links to articles that undermine their argument but whose clickbait headline suggested otherwise.

Don’t get me wrong, I sympathize. This is a tough situation for you. A thread popped up where one of your fellow soldiers offered a novel way to own the leftist filth, and it made you very, very excited for him and his strategy, so you jumped on board as a believer. Then he was outed as a pedophile, and now you’re stuck trying to figure out how to unentangle yourself from this pedophile while still owning the left. It’s not an easy situation for a MAGA to be in, but given the preponderance of pedophiles within MAGA, hopefully by now you’ve had some practice.
What is the sick assed psychological issues of these MAGA guys that have to try to get publicity? They usually all have creepy stuff in their past that they know will come out eventually, yet they persist in doing this shit.

So many perverted sexually repressed talibornagains, and these are just the ones that got caught, think about how many more are out there, just waiting to be exposed.

And, for the posters here who thought they had yet another Gotcha, yet again, they fail, spectacularly.

COMEDY GOLD
 
Unfortunately I can’t currently. Citizens including political Representatives are considered to be “Innocent until Proven Guilty in A Court of Law”
After the Full Legal Process concludes. Found Guilty.
It is clear, from the leftist's world view they keep demonstrating, that such legal fundamentals and rights only apply to their fellow leftist travelers.

Has has been previously observed.
Also emphasized is that he was a progressive target.

The adversarial legal system—in which both sides of a dispute are represented vigorously by attorneys with a vested interest in winning—is at the heart of the American constitutional order. Since time immemorial, law schools have tried to prepare their students to take part in that system.​
Not so much anymore. Now, the politicization and tribalism of campus life have crowded out old-fashioned expectations about justice and neutrality. The imperatives of race, gender and identity are more important to more and more law students than due process, the presumption of innocence, and all the norms and values at the foundation of what we think of as the rule of law.​
. . .​
But critical race theory, until quite recently, only had so much purchase in legal academia. The ideas of its founders—figures like Derrick Bell, Alan David Freeman, and Kimberlé Crenshaw—tended to have less influence on the law than on college students, who by 2015 seemed significantly less liberal (“small L”) than they used to be. There was the Yale Halloween costume kerfuffle. The University of Missouri president being forced out. Students at Evergreen State patrolling campus with baseball bats, eyes peeled for thought criminals.​
At first, the conventional wisdom held that this was “just a few college kids”—a few spoiled snowflakes—who would “grow out of it” when they reached the real world and became serious people. That did not happen. Instead, the undergraduates clung to their ideas about justice and injustice. They became medical students and law students. Then 2020 happened.​
All of sudden, critical race theory was more than mainstream in America’s law schools. It was mandatory.​
Starting this Fall, Georgetown Law School will require all students to take a class “on the importance of questioning the law’s neutrality” and assessing its “differential effects on subordinated groups,” according to university documents obtained by Common Sense. UC Irvine School of Law, University of Southern California Gould School of Law, Yeshiva University’s Cardozo School of Law, and Boston College Law School have implemented similar requirements. Other law schools are considering them.​
As of last month, the American Bar Association is requiring all accredited law schools to “provide education to law students on bias, cross-cultural competency, and racism,” both at the start of law school and “at least once again before graduation.” That’s in addition to a mandatory legal ethics class, which must now instruct students that they have a duty as lawyers to “eliminate racism.” (The American Bar Association, which accredits almost every law school in the United States, voted 348 to 17 to adopt the new standard.)​

And then you think about all those university students protesting on behalf of, and supporting, Hamas, and you begin to wonder what the legal system is going to look like when those now students start their legal careers, with their heads full of CRT, DEI and equity and also support for radical and terrorist causes, apparently.


Purposefully so. There is no need for detailed and specific charges as Cuellar didn't toe the leftist ideological line as he should have. Any charge sufficient to drive him from office is enough.
A whole new level for the 'Just-Us' legal system.

My answer would be Yes. But it won’t be based on a political or a MAGA basis. It will be based on him as a singular human sexual predator.
Sorry but I don’t think like Hillary Rodham Clinton putting every single American Citizen or Rival of the opposition party in a basket 🧺 using the word deplorable.
 
Unfortunately I can’t currently. Citizens including political Representatives are considered to be “Innocent until Proven Guilty in A Court of Law”
After the Full Legal Process concludes. Found Guilty.

My answer would be Yes. But it won’t be based on a political or a MAGA basis. It will be based on him as a singular human sexual predator.
Sorry but I don’t think like Hillary Rodham Clinton putting every single American Citizen or Rival of the opposition party in a basket 🧺 using the word deplorable.
"But Hillary!"

At least you're predictable.
 
So, once again, @trixare4kids started a thread hoping for a gotcha but ending with another face-plant.

It’s fascinating to see @CharisRose taking great pains to avoid acknowledging that this MAGA they were shilling for turned out to be a pedophile.
So once again. I continue to get Trix started a thread with an accusation of a face-plant only based on an opinion without any proof.

It’s fascinating to see the great pains being used concerning the use of a particular political slogan. MAGA meaning Make America Great Again as a negative.
Using only a single representative from the State of Minnesota as the sole representative of The Republican Party. Their opposition party. Using pedophile.


Negative 1. adjective “characterized by or displaying negation or denial or opposition or resistance; having no positive features”

I can use BBB meaning Build Back Better. Biden/Harris

Please prove that The Democratic Party the opposition of The Republican Party actually and factually Built Back America Better during their 4 years in office.

The Democratic Party lost the Presidential Office 🗳️ The Republican Party Won the Presidential Office 🗳️

Keep up the negativity. 👍 One of the many Kamal Harris Presidential Slogans was ~ “ When We Fight We Win” WWFWW Harris/Walz did not win.
 
"But Hillary!"

At least you're predictable.
Of course😎 It’s politics! “But Hillary!” Because “Two can play that game” “What’s good for the goose is good for the gander”

Sorry 😞 “The rules for thee but no for me” meaning “A person who is trying to make others follow rules without having to follow them themselves.

Lost its power. 🤫
 
It is clear, from the leftist's world view they keep demonstrating, that such legal fundamentals and rights only apply to their fellow leftist travelers.

Has has been previously observed.
They have been making that very clear for a very long time.
It seems that leftist world view has finally been noticed that such legal fundamentals and rights only apply to their fellow leftist travelers by many American Voters.

Those many American Voters spoke & leftist fellows are currently covering their ears & screaming. They we’re getting so close to achieving their leftist world view.
 
Unfortunately I can’t currently. Citizens including political Representatives are considered to be “Innocent until Proven Guilty in A Court of Law”
After the Full Legal Process concludes. Found Guilty.

My answer would be Yes. But it won’t be based on a political or a MAGA basis. It will be based on him as a singular human sexual predator.
Sorry but I don’t think like Hillary Rodham Clinton putting every single American Citizen or Rival of the opposition party in a basket 🧺 using the word deplorable.
Well, maybe you could pay closer attention to what Hillary Clinton actually said. She didn't put EVERY single American Citizen or Rival of the opposition party in a basket. She put one half of those lower-functioning supporters of Trump in a basket for deplorables. See the more than 50% difference? Not rivals of the opposition party - not all of the opposition party, in 2016, were rivals. Many of them were able to think and not align themselves with a cult. It was the cult members she was referring to.
 
Well, maybe you could pay closer attention to what Hillary Clinton actually said. She didn't put EVERY single American Citizen or Rival of the opposition party in a basket. She put one half of those lower-functioning supporters of Trump in a basket for deplorables. See the more than 50% difference? Not rivals of the opposition party - not all of the opposition party, in 2016, were rivals. Many of them were able to think and not align themselves with a cult. It was the cult members she was referring to.
I stand corrected. However, she did put “one half” of those “lower-functioning” American Citizen Voters into her basket of deplorables.
The question is how did she come to her “not doubt about it” intellectual conclusion of an exact 50/50 split concerning all of those American Citizen Voters?
How did she use her Higher-Functioning abilities for her exact 50/50 split concerning all of those American Citizen Voters?

Thanks, for the use of the 50% use for the cult members she was referring to… Those lower-functioning American Citizen Voters.

Surprise! Surprise! Some of the 50/50 fence sitters (I don’t know how many) jumped the fence. Voted for Trump. imho


Deplorable 1. adjective ~ “of very poor quality or condition” “deplorable housing conditions in the inner city”

“Deplorable is an adjective used to describe something extremely bad or unfortunate, like the deplorable destruction and loss of life in Japan after the earthquake and tsunami.”

“Deplorable comes from the French word déplorer meaning "to give up as hopeless," meaning something is so bad, there is no hope of improvement like the deplorable actions of the arsonist who burned down the museum filled with priceless antiques. Deplorable can also describe something that is of terrible quality or unhealthful, like the deplorable state of the area under your bed — is that a moldy sandwich under there?”

https://www.npr.org/2016/09/10/4934...orables-in-full-context-of-this-ugly-campaign

“Memo to candidates: Stop generalizing and psychoanalyzing your opponents' supporters. It never works out well for you.”

“The latest to fall into that trap is Hillary Clinton. The Democratic nominee, at a New York fundraiser Friday night with liberal donors and Barbra Streisand, said "half" of Trump supporters fit into a "basket of deplorables," while the other half are people who feel the government has let them down and need understanding and empathy.”

The End of Hillary Rodham Clinton based on fill in the _________.
 
They have been making that very clear for a very long time.
Agreed.

It seems that leftist world view has finally been noticed that such legal fundamentals and rights only apply to their fellow leftist travelers by many American Voters.
Their contortion and distortion of legal system to ben to their political will is concerning, and still a threat, as we are seeing with all the judge shopping for injunctions and TROs founded on 'eyebrow-raising legal theories'. But we've seen this before.


Those many American Voters spoke & leftist fellows are currently covering their ears & screaming.
Yes, as is evident with the Democrats being unglued and rudderless at present (isn't going to last forever either).

They we’re getting so close to achieving their leftist world view.
They may yet still. We'll have to watch and see. I certainly hope not.
 
Agreed.


Their contortion and distortion of legal system to ben to their political will is concerning, and still a threat, as we are seeing with all the judge shopping for injunctions and TROs founded on 'eyebrow-raising legal theories'. But we've seen this before.



Yes, as is evident with the Democrats being unglued and rudderless at present (isn't going to last forever either).


They may yet still. We'll have to watch and see. I certainly hope not.
🙂
Yes it is still a threat, yes judge shopping for injunctions & TROs being founded on ‘eyebrow raising legal theories’. Yes, and we have seen to many.👎

Agreed.

Agreed.
 
I stand corrected. However, she did put “one half” of those “lower-functioning” American Citizen Voters into her basket of deplorables.
The question is how did she come to her “not doubt about it” intellectual conclusion of an exact 50/50 split concerning all of those American Citizen Voters?
How did she use her Higher-Functioning abilities for her exact 50/50 split concerning all of those American Citizen Voters?

Thanks, for the use of the 50% use for the cult members she was referring to… Those lower-functioning American Citizen Voters.

Surprise! Surprise! Some of the 50/50 fence sitters (I don’t know how many) jumped the fence. Voted for Trump. imho


Deplorable 1. adjective ~ “of very poor quality or condition” “deplorable housing conditions in the inner city”

“Deplorable is an adjective used to describe something extremely bad or unfortunate, like the deplorable destruction and loss of life in Japan after the earthquake and tsunami.”

“Deplorable comes from the French word déplorer meaning "to give up as hopeless," meaning something is so bad, there is no hope of improvement like the deplorable actions of the arsonist who burned down the museum filled with priceless antiques. Deplorable can also describe something that is of terrible quality or unhealthful, like the deplorable state of the area under your bed — is that a moldy sandwich under there?”

https://www.npr.org/2016/09/10/4934...orables-in-full-context-of-this-ugly-campaign

“Memo to candidates: Stop generalizing and psychoanalyzing your opponents' supporters. It never works out well for you.”

“The latest to fall into that trap is Hillary Clinton. The Democratic nominee, at a New York fundraiser Friday night with liberal donors and Barbra Streisand, said "half" of Trump supporters fit into a "basket of deplorables," while the other half are people who feel the government has let them down and need understanding and empathy.”

The End of Hillary Rodham Clinton based on fill in the _________.
Let's face it. She didn't win because she didn't work hard enough, and it was her smug choice to take swipes at the electorate. Too bad the electorate didn't agree with her screed, that it was her turn. Thinking back to that time, her comments about those she felt entitled to label deplorables still make me laugh. What a snobby witch.
 
So once again. I continue to get Trix started a thread with an accusation of a face-plant only based on an opinion without any proof.

It’s fascinating to see the great pains being used concerning the use of a particular political slogan. MAGA meaning Make America Great Again as a negative.
Using only a single representative from the State of Minnesota as the sole representative of The Republican Party. Their opposition party. Using pedophile.


Negative 1. adjective “characterized by or displaying negation or denial or opposition or resistance; having no positive features”

I can use BBB meaning Build Back Better. Biden/Harris

Please prove that The Democratic Party the opposition of The Republican Party actually and factually Built Back America Better during their 4 years in office.

The Democratic Party lost the Presidential Office 🗳️ The Republican Party Won the Presidential Office 🗳️

Keep up the negativity. 👍 One of the many Kamal Harris Presidential Slogans was ~ “ When We Fight We Win” WWFWW Harris/Walz did not win.
What a pathetic coping attempt.
 
What a pathetic coping attempt.
Thanks for the personal no compliment about a 🧱 that is laid sideways at the top of a wall attempt! 😉&🙃 👋 👋


Pathetic
“These days, when you see the word pathetic, it's pretty clear that it's no compliment”
1. adjective ~ “deserving or inciting pity”

Coping 1. noun ~ “brick that is laid sideways at the top of a wall”

Attempt 1. verb ~ “make an effort or attempt”
 

Minnesota State Senator Arrested In Sting On Same Day He Introduced 'TDS' Bill​

Minnesota State Sen. Justin Eichorn is not having a good week.

After the pro-Donald Trump Republican introduced a bill on Monday to add “Trump derangement syndrome” (“TDS”) to the state’s statutory definition of mental illness, he was arrested for attempting to solicit sex from someone he thought was a teenage girl, police say.

 
Back
Top Bottom