- Joined
- Sep 14, 2011
- Messages
- 26,629
- Reaction score
- 6,661
- Location
- Florida
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
An electrical stun gun that does not fire darts is treated differently. It is allowed. So is pepper spray. Carry concealed without a license, and even on a college campus. So why do the gun grabbers want tasers? Is there anyone who is pro gun control that can explain this to me?
What's the difference between a taser and an electric stun gun that does not fire darts?
A taser fires projectiles?
What's the difference between a taser and an electric stun gun that does not fire darts?
That seems to be the line drawn. Pepper spray hardly counts as a projectile.
An electric stun gun is pain compliant. Basically you push it on someone until they leave you alone. Essentially it sucks compared to a taser that lets you stand away and shoot someone with a dart that zaps them and locks them up for a second or 2.
But the fact is in terms of hazards to someone's body? About the same. It is garbage that one is against the law to use for self defense on a college campus or for 18 and up.
With an effective range of roughly 15 feet, traceable to the dealer, and near 0 lethality. Why is it treated like a gun?
This is something that the State of Florida has decided should be treated the same as a firearm...actually...a handgun. You must be 21 years of age or older...and you must have a concealed license. On top of that it cannot be carried on a college campus.
Can anyone explain the logic behind gun grabbers? An electrical stun gun that does not fire darts is treated differently. It is allowed. So is pepper spray. Carry concealed without a license, and even on a college campus. So why do the gun grabbers want tasers? Is there anyone who is pro gun control that can explain this to me?
I think the anti-2nd amendment crowd in general doesn't like the people having the means to defend themselves. Tazers are not the only non-gun weapons they try to ban or severely restrict.
James nailed it.
If they ever do ban guns, they won't stop there... next it will be pocket knives, pepper spray... just look at England.
What's the difference between a taser and an electric stun gun that does not fire darts?
What's the difference between a taser and an electric stun gun that does not fire darts?
I think the anti-2nd amendment crowd in general doesn't like the people having the means to defend themselves. Tazers are not the only non-gun weapons they try to ban or severely restrict.
Because it's a firearm by the very definition of the word.With an effective range of roughly 15 feet, traceable to the dealer, and near 0 lethality. Why is it treated like a gun?
Because it's a firearm by the very definition of the word.
A firearm is a gun which expels a projectile through action of a chemical explosive. If they don't restrict tazers then it will undermine their gun regulations.
Why in gods name would you want to defend yourself? Or how do you possible think you can.I think the anti-2nd amendment crowd in general doesn't like the people having the means to defend themselves. Tazers are not the only non-gun weapons they try to ban or severely restrict.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?