- Joined
- Nov 10, 2016
- Messages
- 14,607
- Reaction score
- 9,303
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
During the summer of love Democrats were doing exactly that on a nightly basis. Is it your conclusion the Democrats are not normal people?I assume the dude was blind, I mean, most normal people would not enter a building with broken doors and glass and screaming and yelling going on.
Are you going to post any of the reasons the judge gave for the acquittal or is this thread all about your opinion, sans facts?A Trump appointed judge acquits a defendant who entered the capital building on January 6th, there is a picture of him in the building, of all charges. This should surprise no one as this is the reason that the Federalist and Trump appointed these judges. The judge's excuse was that the defendant said he did not know he could not enter the building and that the government did not prove he knew it violated the law. First, as anyone with a brain knows, it is impossible to prove a negative, but even more, the police trying to keep you out might just be a sign that it is not legal to enter. I am sure all of the January 6th defendants will be lining up to get with this judge and receive their get out of jail free cards. Sometimes I wonder what this country is coming to, and then I see the right wing bringing on autocratic rules and shudder.
Link please.
Only a trump judge could make such a decisioin as other judges have found the defendants guilty.Judge issues first outright acquittal of Jan. 6 riot defendant
The defendant claimed that he thought police allowed him into an entrance near the Capitol Rotunda.www.politico.com
So the DoJ basically had trespassing on the guy but they decided to prosecute him as if he was a terrorist anyway.The judge said that after Martin went inside, he generally milled around and stayed away from areas in the Rotunda where some demonstrators were taunting and skirmishing with police.
“He seemed quite quiet and orderly,” McFadden said. “He did not shout. He did not raise his flag.”
McFadden also said that while Martin was in the Capitol, he spent much of the time making videos with his phone, which the judge said wasn’t much different than what members of the press were doing.
McFadden called the first charge against Martin, knowingly entering in and remaining in a restricted area, a “close call.” The judge added: “But under our system of justice close calls go to the defendant.”
So the DoJ basically had trespassing on the guy but they decided to prosecute him as if he was a terrorist anyway.
Really? What terrorist charges did they bring? (Answer none).So the DoJ basically had trespassing on the guy but they decided to prosecute him as if he was a terrorist anyway.
Once again you demonstrate your lack of education in basic civics. Why am I not surprised?How dare the DOJ prosecute people for a violent attempt to overthrow the first republic and install Trump as leader! Biden should have given them all medals of honor for being such big patriots.
Once again you demonstrate your lack of education in basic civics. Why am I not surprised?
It's all one has when one is perpetually angry.Once again you argue ad hom instead of addressing the points. Why am I not surprised?
Bear in mind, it's proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Without sitting through trial, the premise that someone might not know they do not have permission to enter becomes ridiculous when they are surrounded by a crowd attacking the Capitol Building. Lay siege to a city for a while and eventually resistance stops.....that doesn't mean you were given permission. It's just that people made a calculation about saving lives.
These bastards are lucky the authorities did not respond they way they would have done 100 years ago.
<Lutherf crap omitted>
How dare the DOJ prosecute people for a violent attempt to overthrow the first republic and install Trump as leader! Biden should have given them all medals of honor for being such big patriots.
Once again you demonstrate your lack of education in basic civics. Why am I not surprised?
This guy wasn't violent. By all appearances he was prosecuted merely for the purpose of getting the number of people charged up to a figure that the commie liberals might swallow.How dare the communist liberal criticize violent Trumpists who literally attempted to kill a bunch of congress and Pence, then install an unelected person as leader!
Just more hyperpartisan idiocy tinged with rage.
Are you going to post any of the reasons the judge gave for the acquittal or is this thread all about your opinion, sans facts?
Only a trump judge could make such a decisioin as other judges have found the defendants guilty.Judge issues first outright acquittal of Jan. 6 riot defendant
The defendant claimed that he thought police allowed him into an entrance near the Capitol Rotunda.www.politico.com
“People were streaming by and the officers made no attempt to stop the people,” said the judge, an appointee of President Donald Trump.
The judge said that after Martin went inside, he generally milled around and stayed away from areas in the Rotunda where some demonstrators were taunting and skirmishing with police.
“He seemed quite quiet and orderly,” McFadden said. “He did not shout. He did not raise his flag.”
McFadden also said that while Martin was in the Capitol, he spent much of the time making videos with his phone, which the judge said wasn’t much different than what members of the press were doing.
McFadden called the first charge against Martin, knowingly entering in and remaining in a restricted area, a “close call.” The judge added: “But under our system of justice close calls go to the defendant.”
Are you going to post any of the reasons the judge gave for the acquittal or is this thread all about your opinion, sans facts?
.Consider also that these RWE "hacks" are chosen and intended as "time bombs". Justice Clarence Thomas elevated to the SCOTUS at age 42, this Trump appointed
judge, Trevor McFadden was nominated for the DC Federal Court at age 39...
Matthew Martin, who described Jan. 6 as a “magical day,” had faced misdemeanor charges for going into the Capitol during the insurrection.A Man Claimed Police Let Him Into The Capitol On Jan. 6. A Judge Found Him Not Guilty Of All Charges.
Matthew Martin, who described Jan. 6 as a “magical day,” had faced misdemeanor charges for going into the Capitol during the insurrection.www.buzzfeednews.com
April 6, 2022
" A federal judge on Wednesday found that a New Mexico man “reasonably believed” that police officers let him into the US Capitol during the Jan. 6 breach, ...
Announcing his decision from the bench, US District Judge Trevor McFadden said that although prosecutors argued there were numerous instances when Martin would have been aware that he wasn’t allowed on Capitol grounds or inside the building — as he walked past fences with signs saying “AREA CLOSED” and recorded video of a broken window, blaring alarms, police in riot gear, and people who appeared to have encountered tear gas — those were outweighed by Martin’s “plausible” belief that he had permission because officers didn’t try to stop him from entering.
..Martin’s conduct was as “minimal and non-serious” as the judge could imagine for someone who went into the Capitol on Jan. 6. He said that Martin seemed to be a “silent observer” of the scene and didn’t try to crowd the police, protest, or wave the “Trump” flag that he was carrying..."
"...
Tenure
...In June 2019, McFadden ruled .. This ruling contradicted the 2015 ruling of the .. in U.S. House v. Azar, in which the court found that then-Republican-controlled House of Representatives had standing in a lawsuit against President Obama's Affordable Care Act. In September 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit overturned McFadden's decision and reinstated the House's lawsuit. ..the appellate court held that a single chamber of Congress has "standing to pursue litigation against the Executive for injury to its legislative rights"; ,,the Trump administration's argument .. as a position that "turns the constitutional order upside down."
..chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, has litigated to obtain Trump's tax returns, but McFadden has ruled other matters should be litigated prior to any such release. ..
...
In February 2021, ...McFadden granted Cudd's request to travel to Riviera Maya in Mexico.." on the grounds that she had no previous criminal history, with no objection from Cudd's pretrial services officer or the prosecutor. Subsequent to Cudd's filing of her travel request, she was indicted on five federal counts, including one felony, relating to her alleged activities during the January 6, ..Capitol.
Are you going to post any of the reasons the judge gave for the acquittal or is this thread all about your opinion, sans facts?
He was surrounded by violent protestors in action.......... what did he think was happening? I would imagine the verdict will be appealed.... maybe a new charge will be introduced?
Conspiracy to over throw the USA........ people who join a protest usually know they are joining a protest and why they are joining a protest. I always know why I join a protest......if I did not know why I would not be actively involved the protest.Is that (bolded above) a crime?
Unless I'm mistaken, that's not possible. That would be double jeopardy. Once acquitted it's a done deal. Unless the prosecutor has new charges.He was surrounded by violent protestors in action.......... what did he think was happening? I would imagine the verdict will be appealed.... maybe a new charge will be introduced?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?