Yet that is precisely what Democrats are doing. Manufacturing crimes that nobody has been charged with, and accusing people of committing those manufactured crimes. Which, using your terminology, makes leftist filth the "dumbest, full of shit, dishonest" people alive today.
So when someone is charged with shoplifting we can go around calling them convicted murderers?
That is how mentally deranged leftist filth have become.
You better hope the suit fails. Because if not the tactic could very well be used to take out half of the democrats in congress.Stephen I. Vladeck, expert on the federal courts, constitutional law, national security law, and military justice, gives us a great insight with implications about the lawsuit against Rep Cawthorn.
if the challenge succeeds, it could become a model for similar attempts by voters in other states to seek to disqualify other members of Congress who publicly encouraged and incited — and may have privately facilitated — the violence on Jan. 6. In that respect, the Cawthorn challenge is a fascinating test case for state disqualification procedures — and for the idea that the 14th Amendment’s disqualification clause could be enforced against those involved in Jan. 6 through state elections suits.
Opinion | How the 14th Amendment could block Trump’s cronies from re-election
One way or the other, the legal challenge to Cawthorn’s 2022 candidacy could therefore have enormous implications.www.msnbc.com
But the Cawthorn case illustrates how the argument would go: If an individual is disqualified from serving in Congress because of an express constitutional provision, does it not follow that, in the Supreme Court’s words, they therefore fail to meet “the qualifications expressly set forth in the Constitution”? Put another way, is compliance with the disqualification clause itself one of the express qualifications for office imposed by the Constitution?
One way or the other, the challenge to Cawthorn’s candidacy could therefore have enormous implications not just for the 26-year-old first-term congressman, but for any members who played some part in the tragic and tumultuous events of last January — and for how the long-moribund disqualification clause of the 14th Amendment is enforced going forward.
Nope inconvenient truth.
The better question is which have supported overtly insurrection and attacking elected officials and their employees. We can start with Maxine Waters and move on from there.
Perhaps in fascist Canada, but in the US it is called free speech. I realize that is something you vehemently hate, but you will just have to get use to it or move to fascist Canada where the government can compel speech and you have no rights.
You do that every day on this board in blatant double standard hypocrisy. As far as I am concerned you have more than earned the derision you recieve.
You mean correct.
We will see about that this coming November. Somehow, I don't think I will be the one who loses.
Irrelevant. Your hate speech was deliberately designed to dehumanize people to the left of you, so that you can control us like Putin (who you also like) is trying to control Ukraine.
Not going to happen. You will lose.
We will see about that this coming November. Somehow, I don't think I will be the one who loses.
What attack? I said you earned the derision you receive and you are a blatant hypocrite in response to a post claiming I dehumanize people who don't agree with my positions. Perhaps you meant defence.And here they come. The ad hom attacks. The classic sign of running out of arguments while running your mouth.
The exact kind of hate speech that your boy Putin is broadcasting over the Russian airwaves.
How interesting, you think you made a point. Too bad you didnt.My how quickly we forget the words we wrote:
You agreed with the post. You support hate speech, Pirate.
Have a good night.
Nope, I'll still support the lawsuit. Any existing or potential Congress Critter who shows signs in any fashion that supports a sedition/insurrection/coup attempts against sane presidents who support a true Democracy should not be allowed to run for government office in our United States regardless of their political party.
lol
The last time I checked sedition was not insurrection. Or are you one of those who are incapable of determining the difference between the two crimes? Every leftist has been incapable thus far. Why are not these leftist morons calling them "seditionists" then instead of insurrectionists? Because leftist filth have lost all touch with reality and are completely insane, as the rest of the planet has already observed.
Rightist filth have lost track of reality and now defend and excuse sedition.
https://www.wfae.org/2022-03-02/onc...thorns-candidacy-for-congress-over-jan-6-ties
www.wral.com
Doomed to fail.... Yup that is just what happened!!
www.wral.com
