- Joined
- Feb 25, 2019
- Messages
- 59,991
- Reaction score
- 30,728
- Location
- Devonshire, England
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Why do you insist on lying? Anyone-you, me, anyone, can report an adverse event to VAERS.VAERS is/was a warning shot. The libs don't like VAERS and make the preposterous claim that regular people report to VAERS when they have zero evidence of that.
Anyone can report an adverse event to VAERS. Why are you claiming they cannot?VAERS is/was a warning shot. The libs don't like VAERS and make the preposterous claim that regular people report to VAERS when they have zero evidence of that.
They didn't actually study people who had received the vaccine compared to those who didn't at all. They tried to correlate spikes in Cardiovascular events with vaccine rollouts, without bothering to even check if the people who suffered a CE had gotten a vaccine or had Covid.It is important to note the main limitation of this study, which is that it relies on aggregated data that do not include specific information regarding the affected patients, including hospital outcomes, underlying comorbidities as well as vaccination and COVID-19 positive status.
Hmmmmm
Leaves out COVID positive when it IS KNOWN that having COVID can lead to heart issues.
We have gone over this many times. YOU didn't know what VAERS was until I told you. Do you really expect the general; public to be bothered with reporting to them when they are under zero obligation to do that and ONLY doctors are required to report?Why do you insist on lying? Anyone-you, me, anyone, can report an adverse event to VAERS.
Those listed above who may report to VAERS include patients, parents/family members, caregivers, those who administer vaccines, healthcare providers and vaccine manufacturers. And no, you don't get to demand excerpts for your personal convenience.Reporting Adverse Events to VAERS | Vaccine Safety | CDC
Learn about reporting adverse events to VAERS – including who can report, what to report and what happens after a report is submitted.www.cdc.gov
They didn't actually study people who had received the vaccine compared to those who didn't at all. They tried to correlate spikes in Cardiovascular events with vaccine rollouts, without bothering to even check if the people who suffered a CE had gotten a vaccine or had Covid.
No, it doesn't make any actual logical "sense", since they simply could not say what was causing the increases. Instead, they played correlation automatically equals causation, something "researchers" should not do.The data they had access to did not specify that. What they did made sense, considering how hard it is to get reliable data about this.
You're lying again; show me the post where you think you educated me on VAERS., The only clueless person where it comes to VAERS is you, as clearly demonstrated in the post I replied to. I honestly don't know why you bother posting here; I guess it's a source of amusement for most, it certainly isn't educational for anyone. Even you refuse to be educated, and your posts simply double down on dumbness every time someone has to correct you, again.We have gone over this many times. YOU didn't know what VAERS was until I told you. Do you really expect the general; public to be bothered with reporting to them when they are under zero obligation to do that and ONLY doctors are required to report?
Your evidence that the general public reports their ailments to VAERS?You're lying again; show me the post where you think you educated me on VAERS., The only clueless person where it comes to VAERS is you, as clearly demonstrated in the post I replied to. I honestly don't know why you bother posting here; I guess it's a source of amusement for most, it certainly isn't educational for anyone. Even you refuse to be educated, and your posts simply double down on dumbness every time someone has to correct you, again.
And yes, we have gone over this many times, yet you still persist in being wrong with virtually every worthless post. Takes some doing.
No, sorry, you don't understand scientific research. There are many times when a controlled experiment is not possible, and researchers look for correlations. If you compare before and after the vaccines became available, and there is more heart disease after, then it is reasonable to suspect the vaccines may have caused it. It is not an absolutely certain fact -- hardly anything in medical research is.No, it doesn't make any actual logical "sense", since they simply could not say what was causing the increases. Instead, they played correlation automatically equals causation, something "researchers" should not do.
People report possible side effects to their doctor who is then required to report it to VAERS.We have gone over this many times. YOU didn't know what VAERS was until I told you. Do you really expect the general; public to be bothered with reporting to them when they are under zero obligation to do that and ONLY doctors are required to report?
Studies are possible here though using just actual data, rather than trying to correlate, wrongly. This study has serious flaws, but you believe it is good because you want to believe it.No, sorry, you don't understand scientific research. There are many times when a controlled experiment is not possible, and researchers look for correlations. If you compare before and after the vaccines became available, and there is more heart disease after, then it is reasonable to suspect the vaccines may have caused it. It is not an absolutely certain fact -- hardly anything in medical research is.
Only someone who has never studied research methodology would say that correlations are of no use. Careful analysis of correlations is a big part of what researchers do. As I said, controlled experiments are not always possible.
I very much appreciate all of those who became one of Fauci's beagles. I chose to remain in the control group, equally as important.Studies are possible here though using just actual data, rather than trying to correlate, wrongly. This study has serious flaws, but you believe it is good because you want to believe it.
This doesn't have to be a controlled experiment, but rather only include actual information on those who did have those events, and their vaccination status and/or whether they had Covid at time of or before cardiovascular event. If you are conducting an honest study, that information is reasonably needed.
Statistics like over six million deaths, globally, and one million in the US? What do "they" say about statistics?I very much appreciate all of those who became one of Fauci's beagles. I chose to remain in the control group, equally as important.
What is it that they say about statistics?
Lies, damned lies, and statisticsStatistics like over six million deaths, globally, and one million in the US? What do "they" say about statistics?
Mark Twain? Who cares what he thought.Lies, damned lies, and statistics
Mark Twain
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?