Strong early-vote turnout gives Dems hope in Georgia runoffs

[Mashmont]

The pathetic thing is that Trump's appointment of conservative judges all across the country was really the only thing you people had to rejoice about. Now, you even strip that away from Trump because your zealotry for conspiracy theories, personal denial, and foolishness is more important.

Funny that Trump's rallying cry depends on people like you.

So which leftwing network has ever interviewed one of 1170 people who have signed sworn statements under threat of perjury and imprisonment, testifying to the fraud they saw? Which network has posited an answer as to why vote count stopped simultaneously? Which network has interviewed statisticians who say the uptick in all Biden votes is a mathematical impossibility?

 

[MSgt]

So would you like to stab at answering why the five swing states in question all announced they suspended vote counting nearly simultaneously in an unprecedented manner? Nobody has ever answered that question.

Because that is not what happened. That's just what your right-wing traitors told you. Hard to answer a bogus question.

But maybe you can answer why Trump only cared about "fraud" in states he lost. Absolutely worthless.

 

[bearpoker]

And what is it you do to the link of the Sidney Powell quote?

You haven't given any links. I'm sure Powell did indeed say that. The link's not the problem. Powell's statement is inaccurate. Jred has quoted judges in numerous cases who did look at the evidence presented. One case was dismissed by the Supreme Court on procedural grounds. One not all.

 

[MSgt]

So which leftwing network has ever interviewed one of 1170 people who have signed sworn statements under threat of perjury and imprisonment, testifying to the fraud they saw? Which network has posited an answer as to why vote count stopped simultaneously? Which network has interviewed statisticians who say the uptick in all Biden votes is a mathematical impossibility?

So...they saw fraud, yet still no evidence. Odd how "1170" people saw something, yet there is no evidence. If "1170" people saw a bank robbery, I bet a bank robbery occurred.

Clearly, "1170" witnesses are partisan hacks who have absolutely no integrity, no honor, and are as much national traitors as their President.

It's amazing how hard you have to run from common sense and logic to arrive at place like this.

 

[MSgt]

And what is it you do to the link of the Sidney Powell quote?

Point out that she lies. Even CNN will provide a story on Powell's moronic and unfounded declarations. The fact that she vomits isn't proof. The fact that judges are scratching their heads over that vomit and rejecting her claims is proof.

But it is only radical right-wing sources that will promote Powell as your latest savior. Even Fox News knows where the line is between what she declares and the reality.

 

[Jredbaron96]

The courts dismissed Trump's cases on procedural grounds, such as the claim of the plaintiffs having no standing.

A, that's not true, B, you didn't answer my question:

So your assertion that all the Courts that have dismissed Trump's cases are left wing?

Also, SCOTUS unanimously said Texas's claims had no merit. Are they all left wing now?

 

[bearpoker]

So...they saw fraud, yet still no evidence. Odd how "1170" people saw something, yet there is no evidence. If "1170" people saw a bank robbery, I bet a bank robbery occurred.

Clearly, "1170" witnesses are partisan hacks who have absolutely no integrity, no honor, and are as much national traitors as their President.

It's amazing how hard you have to run from common sense and logic to arrive at place like this.

Mash is happy in his fantasy world. The more you attack it, the stronger his defense.

 

[bongsaway]

My gut feeling is Dems may pick-up one seat (Perdue/Ossoff). Though I admit that doesn't make much sense, because I find it hard to believe there would be much ticket-splitting between the two races. But, you never know?

I've given up on guessing. I will say this, I do not think the seats will be split. One party will take them both.

 

[bongsaway]

Let's face it. Unless the fraud from early voting is stopped in its tracks right now, Democrats will never have a reason to stop cheating.

Tell any friends or family you have in georgia to stay home and not vote in this rigged election.

 

[MSgt]

The evidence has never been investigated, nor have any affidavits been examined by a court. - Sidney Powell December 28, 2020.

Discover some self-respect already.

 

[MSgt]

Mash is happy in his fantasy world. The more you attack it, the stronger his defense.

Or denial. I'd say he is playing a cartoon character, but this has always been him.

All he does is insult his own intelligence, forsake all common sense, and reduce himself to a partisan tool. Now he wants to believe that all courts that have rejected Trump are simply "left-wing," even if Trump appointed them. There is no logic here. There is only nonsense. He can't even be a partisan hack without betraying his own partisanship. His "deep state" merely grows.

In the end, his behavior amounts to betraying his own country for these traitors.

 

[bearpoker]

Or denial. I'd say he is playing a cartoon character, but this has always been him.

All he does is insult his own intelligence, forsakes all common sense, and reduces himself to a partisan tool. In the end, his behavior amounts to betraying his own country for these traitors.

I agree. Engaging Mash won't change him. What it will do is expose his beliefs to others as fantasies. The falsehoods and deceptions of Trumpism need to be discredited and flushed.

 

[weaver2]

That's the typical Alinsky deflection "Accuse your enemies of offenses only your side is committing". There is overwhelming evidence leftwing thugs cast thousands of fake ballots. That was the entire reason for the mail-in voting scam.

LOL Alinsky never said that. What he said was:
Rule 2: Never go outside the experience of your people. The result is confusion, fear, and retreat.
Rule 3: Whenever possible, go outside the experience of an opponent. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat." And you do just the opposite.

I have to admit you do use
Rule 8: Keep the pressure on. Your problem is you don't understand the 2nd part of rule 8.
"Use different tactics and actions and use all events of the period for your purpose. "The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this that will cause the opposition to react to your advantage." Nah-uh is not an effective tactic.

 

[Mashmont]

LOL Alinsky never said that. What he said was:
Rule 2: Never go outside the experience of your people. The result is confusion, fear, and retreat.
Rule 3: Whenever possible, go outside the experience of an opponent. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat." And you do just the opposite.

I have to admit you do use
Rule 8: Keep the pressure on. Your problem is you don't understand the 2nd part of rule 8.
"Use different tactics and actions and use all events of the period for your purpose. "The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this that will cause the opposition to react to your advantage." Nah-uh is not an effective tactic.

It's not one of the official 'rules', but he said it:
Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals: "Accuse your opponent of what you are doing, to create confusion and to inculcate voters against evidence of your own guilt"

 

[Mashmont]

I agree. Engaging Mash won't change him. What it will do is expose his beliefs to others as fantasies. The falsehoods and deceptions of Trumpism need to be discredited and flushed.

Leftwingers and atheists lie. It's the hallmark of all leftwing atheist regimes. Believe the Marxist narrative and disbelieve your own eyes.

 

[bearpoker]

LOL Alinsky never said that. What he said was:
Rule 2: Never go outside the experience of your people. The result is confusion, fear, and retreat.
Rule 3: Whenever possible, go outside the experience of an opponent. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat." And you do just the opposite.

I have to admit you do use
Rule 8: Keep the pressure on. Your problem is you don't understand the 2nd part of rule 8.
"Use different tactics and actions and use all events of the period for your purpose. "The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this that will cause the opposition to react to your advantage." Nah-uh is not an effective tactic.

Mash always uses the same tactics and since he doesn't acknowledge reality, he is unable to use events to his advantage.

 

[Mashmont]

Or denial. I'd say he is playing a cartoon character, but this has always been him.

All he does is insult his own intelligence, forsake all common sense, and reduce himself to a partisan tool. Now he wants to believe that all courts that have rejected Trump are simply "left-wing," even if Trump appointed them. There is no logic here. There is only nonsense. He can't even be a partisan hack without betraying his own partisanship. His "deep state" merely grows.

In the end, his behavior amounts to betraying his own country for these traitors.

Discover some self-respect already.

Maybe start respecting the country. I can't believe I would have to say this to an alleged career Marine.

 

[weaver2]

Maybe start respecting the country. I can't believe I would have to say this to an alleged career Marine.

How about defining "respecting the country" for us, since most of what you post seems dictatorial, arbitrary and driven by sectarianism none of which seems very respectful of a country that believes in free elections, freedom of individual thought and has no official religious connection.

 

[Patriotic Voter]

Hopefully the Dems win both seats, that is the only way to erase all of the crap that Trump has done to this country.

A lot more needs to be done after January 5 to finally erase ALL of the crap, but both Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock winning would make fixing everything else much easier.

 

[Old 'N Chill]

More about the runoffs.

Georgia enters final days of pivotal Senate races

We're now just days away from the final elections of the 2020 campaign, with two critical runoffs in Georgia determining control in the U.S. Senate. More than 2.8 million people have cast ballots so far. Stephen Fowler, a political reporter for Georgia Public Broadcasting and host of the...

www.pbs.org

 

[99percenter]

polls are saying dem but betters are saying gop.

 

[Rudy]

Really wouldn't be surprised if, in a state that is so redneck and stupid that the Republicans actually do steal this.

 

[mike2810]

So which leftwing network has ever interviewed one of 1170 people who have signed sworn statements under threat of perjury and imprisonment, testifying to the fraud they saw? Which network has posited an answer as to why vote count stopped simultaneously? Which network has interviewed statisticians who say the uptick in all Biden votes is a mathematical impossibility?

- Sworn statements are not worth much unless other evidence backs up the statement. They are nothing more than what the person believes they saw. The problem is what they believe may not be true. People have made sworn statements that they saw bigfoot. Does that prove bigfoot exists?
- I am still waiting for Team Trump to present the massive amounts of evidence Trump keeps talking about.
- Audits in Arizona shows the machine counts for votes matched the hand counts. In AZ the person fills out a ballot and it is scanned. To date Team Trump cannot answer how the hand count can match the machines if they were rigged. So lets use the hand count Guess what, Trump lost.

- What I find pretty condescending when an elected official talks about how 74 million voters are being disenfranchised if Trump is not elected President. Wouldn't the same could be said for the millions who voted for Biden?

- Did OANN or Newsmax broadcast interviews with specialists that says the mathematical impossibility claim is bunk. Have they broadcast coverage that some analysis was done with old data.
Did they explain why some reports used data that was not even from the State in question?

Some need to research and use more than OANN, Newsmax or Hannity.

 

[Mashmont]

- Sworn statements are not worth much unless other evidence backs up the statement. They are nothing more than what the person believes they saw. The problem is what they believe may not be true. People have made sworn statements that they saw bigfoot. Does that prove bigfoot exists?
- I am still waiting for Team Trump to present the massive amounts of evidence Trump keeps talking about.
- Audits in Arizona shows the machine counts for votes matched the hand counts. In AZ the person fills out a ballot and it is scanned. To date Team Trump cannot answer how the hand count can match the machines if they were rigged. So lets use the hand count Guess what, Trump lost.

- What I find pretty condescending when an elected official talks about how 74 million voters are being disenfranchised if Trump is not elected President. Wouldn't the same could be said for the millions who voted for Biden?

- Did OANN or Newsmax broadcast interviews with specialists that says the mathematical impossibility claim is bunk. Have they broadcast coverage that some analysis was done with old data.
Did they explain why some reports used data that was not even from the State in question?

Some need to research and use more than OANN, Newsmax or Hannity.

No, because they're weren't nearly as many Biden voters. Nothing close to Trump's total.

 

[mike2810]

No, because they're weren't nearly as many Biden voters. Nothing close to Trump's total.

Noted: no source to back up your statement. Just like Team Trump and the voting fraud conspiracy.