This is a hypothetical. Let's say that stem cell research did not involve the use of embryos but involved something else which had the same potential and success as embryonic stem cell research. There would no embryos or human life destroyed in the use of stem cell research.
Would you support or oppose stem cell research?
This is a hypothetical. Let's say that stem cell research did not involve the use of embryos but involved something else which had the same potential and success as embryonic stem cell research. There would no embryos or human life destroyed in the use of stem cell research.
Would you support or oppose stem cell research?
This is a hypothetical. Let's say that stem cell research did not involve the use of embryos but involved something else which had the same potential and success as embryonic stem cell research. There would no embryos or human life destroyed in the use of stem cell research.
Would you support or oppose stem cell research?
Any research that has the potential of curing deadly or debilitating disease is good research.
Not at the expense of innocent human life, particularly when so many of those lives will be squandered in search of a justifiable outcome.
Well, of course, if you kill people to further research, that isn't justified. If you create an embryo for the purpose of research, that is pretty questionable. If you use one that has been aborted already, or one that was created via in vitrio and is left over, why not use it instead of discarding it?
This is a hypothetical. Let's say that stem cell research did not involve the use of embryos but involved something else which had the same potential and success as embryonic stem cell research. There would no embryos or human life destroyed in the use of stem cell research.
Would you support or oppose stem cell research?
If you are talking about adult stem cell research, which has proven success and harms no one, I enthusiastically support it.
Adult stem cell research doesn't have near the potential that embryonic stem cell research has. That's why I put the question as a hypothetical.
This is a hypothetical. Let's say that stem cell research did not involve the use of embryos but involved something else which had the same potential and success as embryonic stem cell research. There would no embryos or human life destroyed in the use of stem cell research.
Would you support or oppose stem cell research?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?