Stefanik Changes Tune on Condemning Nazis

[otto105]

You do? Great. Lets conduct a test. Do women have a penis?

Hilarious

Does freedom in maga speak mean suppression of it?

Does personal liberty in MAGA speak mean limiting it?

 

[Fletch]

Hilarious

Does freedom in maga speak mean suppression of it?

Does personal liberty in MAGA speak mean limiting it?

I dont see an answer to the question in there anywhere. So I can only conclude that you, like most leftists, dont know what a woman is.

 

[Simpletruther]

.

The hypocrisy isn't an accident.

Nor is it an accident on the left.

 

[otto105]

I dont see an answer to the question in there anywhere. So I can only conclude that you, like most leftists, dont know what a woman is.

Sure, sure and I can conclude the you don’t know what freedom and personal liberty are.

 

[j brown's body]

I dont see an answer to the question in there anywhere. So I can only conclude that you, like most leftists, dont know what a woman is.

Are you arguing the Nazis were right about persecuting trans?

 

[Fletch]

Sure, sure and I can conclude the you don’t know what freedom and personal liberty are.

I do know. Its you who cant define what a woman is

 

[craig]

Both can be true. The 4 or 5 people who said vile things can and should be condemned, but the left is clearly hyperventilating. As they always do.

It is those that heard them and said nothing that are the problem.

 

[Fletch]

Are you arguing the Nazis were right about persecuting trans?

How in TF did you get that out of what I wrote? Its like some of you libs are incapable of honest discussion of any issue at all.

 

[j brown's body]

How in TF did you get that out of what I wrote? Its like some of you libs are incapable of honest discussion of any issue at all.

You brought up trans in a thread about Republicans loving Hitler.

Republicans repress trans and Hitler killed them.

Those inconvenient comparisons make themselves.

 

[Fletch]

You brought up trans in a thread about Republicans loving Hitler.

Republicans repress trans and Hitler killed them.

Those inconvenient comparisons make themselves.

Wrong and dishonest as hell. Go review my conversation with the other poster and quit spreading lies.

 

[otto105]

I do know. Its you who cant define what a woman is

Hilarious

You going to george santos get out of prison party?

Or waiting for the maxwell one?

You brought up trans in a thread about Republicans loving Hitler.

Republicans repress trans and Hitler killed them.

Those inconvenient comparisons make themselves.

fact

 

[Deuce]

I do know. Its you who cant define what a woman is

hahaha you people are still obsessing over this?
Get new material. You're getting boring.

 

[craig]

I do know. Its you who cant define what a woman is

As I have said before. Man and Woman are defined by culture. Male and female are defined by biology.

Yes, the words "man" and "woman" have cultural and social meanings, while "male" and "female" are often used for biological or more clinical descriptions. The use of "man" and "woman" is intertwined with societal views, roles, and gender identity, whereas "male" and "female" are more commonly associated with sex, genetics, and physiology

 

[Fletch]

As I have said before. Man and Woman are defined by culture. Male and female are defined by biology.

Yes, the words "man" and "woman" have cultural and social meanings, while "male" and "female" are often used for biological or more clinical descriptions. The use of "man" and "woman" is intertwined with societal views, roles, and gender identity, whereas "male" and "female" are more commonly associated with sex, genetics, and physiology

False. Male, man, boy all define the same thing. The male of the human species. If you want to put forth the nonsensical argument that what defines men and women are societal creations, then when and where did society decide to start calling men in dresses women?

 

[Fletch]

hahaha you people are still obsessing over this?
Get new material. You're getting boring.

Thats exactly what someone who cant define what a woman is would say,

 

[craig]

False. Male, man, boy all define the same thing. The male of the human species. If you want to put forth the nonsensical argument that what defines men and women are societal creations, then when and where did society decide to start calling men in dresses women?

Throughout history men have dressed and lived as women in most cultures. Sometimes openly and often covertly.

 

[NuffSaid]

Both can be true. The 4 or 5 people who said vile things can and should be condemned, but the left is clearly hyperventilating. As they always do.

They weren’t condemned.
Vance and Stefanik support them.

 

[WisconIndependent]

How in TF did you get that out of what I wrote? Its like some of you libs are incapable of honest discussion of any issue at all.

I( find it interesting that so many of those on the far right think that they can lie as much as they want in a conversation and think that is discussion

 

[Fletch]

They weren’t condemned.
Vance and Stefanik support them.

Got quotes?

 

[Fletch]

I( find it interesting that so many of those on the far right think that they can lie as much as they want in a conversation and think that is discussion

Got an example?

 

[NuffSaid]

Got quotes?

“These were not even candidates for elected office outside of internally in a young professional political organization,” Stefanik wrote on X, shortly after Vance’s post.

Vance has not defended the posts, which contained more than 250 racist, homophobic and antisemitic slurs, though he did refer to them as “edgy, offensive jokes.” The vice president has called the response to the posts “pearl clutching” and said “kids do stupid things, especially young boys” even though the chat group included men in their 20s and early 30s who hold local, state and federal government posts.

Neither knuckle dragging MAGA idiot could condemn the text messages.
But I guess these "kids" are allowed to tell "edgy jokes".

 

[bullseyelqcs]

False. Male, man, boy all define the same thing. The male of the human species. If you want to put forth the nonsensical argument that what defines men and women are societal creations, then when and where did society decide to start calling men in dresses women?

False....for one, a man and a boy are NOT the same thing remotely.

Male doesn't inherently describe a man, because sex (genetic) and gender (societal) are not the same thing. Want proof? Here you go.....

When your buddy is giving you shit and tells you that your wife is more of a man than you are, its highly unlikely he actually means she's got a bigger member than you do. That is because what makes one a "man" is a societal construct, not a genetic one. She will never be more male than you are, but she could indeed be viewed as more manly than you given some circumstances.

 

[Fletch]

False....for one, a man and a boy are NOT the same thing remotely.

???? They are genetically identical

Male doesn't inherently describe a man, because sex (genetic) and gender (societal) are not the same thing. Want proof? Here you go.....

When your buddy is giving you shit and tells you that your wife is more of a man than you are, its highly unlikely he actually means she's got a bigger member than you do. That is because what makes one a "man" is a societal construct, not a genetic one. She will never be more male than you are, but she could indeed be viewed as more manly than you given some circumstances.

That might be the single dumbest thing I have ever read here. A man in womanface is no more a woman than a man in blackface is black.

 

[Fletch]

“These were not even candidates for elected office outside of internally in a young professional political organization,” Stefanik wrote on X, shortly after Vance’s post.

That a description, not a defense.

Vance has not defended the posts, which contained more than 250 racist, homophobic and antisemitic slurs, though he did refer to them as “edgy, offensive jokes.” The vice president has called the response to the posts “pearl clutching” and said “kids do stupid things, especially young boys” even though the chat group included men in their 20s and early 30s who hold local, state and federal government posts.

Saying that the texts were 'stupid things' is not a defense and the left is always clutching their pearls

Neither knuckle dragging MAGA idiot could condemn the text messages.
But I guess these "kids" are allowed to tell "edgy jokes".

Lol knuckle draggers. More pearl clutching. Did you get this upset over the texts from Jay Jones?

 

[NuffSaid]

That a description, not a defense.

Saying that the texts were 'stupid things' is not a defense and the left is always clutching their pearls

Lol knuckle draggers. More pearl clutching. Did you get this upset over the texts from Jay Jones?

This thread is about MAGA refusing to condemn the Young Nazis, I mean Young Republicans.

Same tactic MAGA made when Trump buddy Mark Robinson was making similar posts. Defend, deflect.

Why can’t MAGA condemn people who post shit about loving Hitler?