- Joined
- Mar 7, 2018
- Messages
- 62,606
- Reaction score
- 19,348
- Location
- Lower Mainland of BC
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
I believe that the first line in my previous reply to your question was "The first table refers to total population only.".
If they haven’t caught Covid yet, they will.Michigan and Minnesota now have 60% of their citizens initiating the vaccine dosage. Well done
In re masks: For some reason, when I wear them, they fall off my nose (though they do cover my mouth) and constantly have to re-adjust. Any idea how to fix that?
Michigan and Minnesota now have 60% of their citizens initiating the vaccine dosage. Well done
I respectfully submit this as evidence of coronavirus stats ...
One thing I had not found online is state-by-state Deaths-per-capita after June 2021 (delta wave+) or in all of 2021 (vaccines became available).
I would have thought some website would allow me to select a timeframe and then display deaths per capita across states (or counties) but I did not find it.
My guess is a lot of red states will be at the top of that chart.
Nebraska now has 79% of its population with one dose of the vaccine according to Johns Hopkins. Well done
Using this:Not according to the latest CDC figures
which put Nebraska at 64.95% for "Single Dose" and 58.41% for "Full Vaccination".
Using this:
Nebraska - COVID-19 Overview - Johns Hopkins
Nebraska - COVID New Cases, Deaths, Testing Data - Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Centercoronavirus.jhu.edu
This means I have a math fail.I am looking under vaccination doses and subtracting the number of those who are fully vaccinated from the number of doses administered. That means my conversions are wrong. If I'm using those two figures, how should I math them?
New Hampshire now has over 60% of its residents initiating the vaccine series (including those who have finished the series). Well done!
Nope, every one of those 776,346 is contained in the 870,775.According to New Hampshire's own data (As of when I posted that), 870,775 people have initiated the vaccine, while 776,346 are completely vaccinated. It sounds like you are arguing that it's actually something like 1,647,132 and 776,346, respectively.
IF, and I know that this is not the case, the ONLY vaccine being administered in New Hampshire required two doses in order to reach "Full Vaccination", then, since the total doses that have been administered is 1,664,670 and the number of people who are fully vaccinated is 779,341, that would account for 1,558,682 of the doses administered thus leaving 105,988 doses for the 95,159 difference between the "FV" and "OS" groups. That difference of 10,829 (0.650% of the total) could easily be accounted for by those people who have received MORE than two shots.To help me better understand their data, how do I know that those two numbers do, in fact, overlap (whereas some states report them individually)? Their website does not seem to indicate this, especially (as of when I posted this), the number of individuals vaccinated will exceed the number of doses.
Here is the link: https://www.covid19.nh.gov/dashboard/vaccination
NOTE: When presented either "Our World in Data," Johns Hopkins, whatever, I always choose official state statistics over "third-party' sites.
I got it off their website.If you did the 57 per day rate, can we get a better number on the "actual" dosage then? Perhaps they've been forgetting to update their statistics?