Define "normal". Left-handedness is not "normal" in the sense that it is a minority of the population. The "norm" is to be right-handed, and as thus left-handers are not part of the "norm".
Too many people, though, have come to include, consciously or subconsciously, equating 'normal' as 'weird' or 'wrong', which is wholly incorrect. Left-handedness is abnormal in that it is not the majority, but that doesn't mean there is anything wrong with it.
So if a man and a woman have anal sex....it's wrong?
No.
Does yours?
Do you remember when you went LMAO, laughing like a deranged loon?
You said it was still there then.
Guess you were wrong & just laughing like a fool for nothing...
Because an option that was there before, that some people liked, will no longer be there?
It changes the entire definition of marriage for everyone getting married ...to accomodate a handful of I want what I want when I want and you HAVE to do what I wants...its garbage
Is this another one of those things where statistics are misleading depending on how they're used?
"More" people? Percentage-wise, or raw numbers-wise? If percentage, that'd be a great stat. If raw numbers, well... duh!... heterosexuals vastly outnumber homosexuals to begin with, so it makes perfect sense that more would engage in anal sex.
Not unlike pointing out that more white people collect welfare, but a much higher percentage of black people collect welfare. The same stats can be carefully chosen to portray whatever you want them to portray, hence do they really portray anything?
I do wonder how anybody knows, this, btw. :2razz:
It changes the entire definition of marriage for everyone getting married ...to accomodate a handful of I want what I want when I want and you HAVE to do what I wants...its garbage
There will always be exceptions, of course, in both gay and straight couples. But, they are just that, exceptions, not the general rule itself.
You are seeing it more and more in straight couples, though, as it is becoming more socially accepted for the exceptions to exist openly. Forty years ago societal peer pressure would have precluded many men from staying home as "house husbands". Today, not so much.
Will we ever reach a point where traditional gender roles are split roughly 50/50? I don't think so. I think nature plays its predominate role in this regard. The social progress that we will make will be in accepting those who don't neatly fit the stereotype.
no it didnt do that at all
husband and wife are still acceptable terms :shrug:
It changes the entire definition of marriage for everyone getting married ...to accomodate a handful of I want what I want when I want and you HAVE to do what I wants...its garbage
Ohh how nice of them is that...they changed it on official certificates...so how did it not change
Also, it's funny that these discussions tend to end up on attacks homosexual males, and seem to forget us gals. I guess we're not as offensive :lol:
It changes the entire definition of marriage for everyone getting married ...to accomodate a handful of I want what I want when I want and you HAVE to do what I wants...its garbage
Yes, equal rights, real ****ing shame!!!
How will it change YOUR marriage if some other couple gets married?
It will not change the definition of your marriage. Only you and your spouse can define your marriage.
Equal my ass...gays are the FEW that are different...if you want to get married decided whos going to play hubby and whos going to pay wife and leave everything ALONE for the 94% who arent different
Ohh how nice of them is that...they changed it on official certificates...so how did it not change
No, changing what married people are called on a government form is not changing the definition of marriage. And your "handful" of people where the majority of voters in the state.
What is changing except two lines on a government form?
Are you offended when a form has a line for spouse?
Equal my ass...gays are the FEW that are different...if you want to get married decide whos going to play hubby and whos going to play wife and leave everything ALONE for the 94% who arent different
Well then what is your objection to this again?
Allowing them to get married is EQUAL rights not changing the definition or what marriage is called...two men want to get married let them pick which one is going to wear the panties and leave the rest of the people alone...the voters didnt vote to CHANGE what marriage is..they voted to allow gay marriage...lets keep in mind most states vote that down
Its not even my objection. I dont have a dog in the fight, but if you look at the thread (& even more at the wider world) other people do & it was avoidable in many cases.
Ive never seen the sense in rules, or laws, that piss people off when a better option could have been provided.
I dont understand why anyone would want to argue with that position.
.... Who is going to play hubby and wife? I cook, clean, do laundry and still find time to make money. Does that make me the husband or wife?
Equal my ass...gays are the FEW that are different...if you want to get married decide whos going to play hubby and whos going to play wife and leave everything ALONE for the 94% who arent different
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?