• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

St. Louis Couple Loses their AR15 (1 Viewer)

Court Jester said:
Clearly you have no concept of what the moral OBLIGATION to defend yourself or others is about.
Click to expand...

No, it was really about your signature of "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) being represented by a fist


Hence my sarcastic comment: "That's how to become great, let's tell the Russians and Chinese..."
 
TurtleDude said:
Looks like a 42 USC 1983 suit that should be worth about 250K. These people are aggressive and smart lawyers. Probably much smarter than the Soros backed prosecutor. Plus the state AG is on their side.
Click to expand...

Sure, but did they commit a crime or were their civil rights violated?

You don't seem to know...

SS 571.030. — Unlawful use of weapons--exceptions--penalties. :: Chapter 571 — Weapons Offenses :: Title XXXVIII — CRIMES AND PUNISHMENT; PEACE OFFICERS AND PUBLIC DEFENDERS :: 2005 Missouri Revised Statutes :: Missouri Revised Statutes :: US Codes and Statutes :: US Law :: Justia

2005 Missouri Revised Statutes - § 571.030. — Unlawful use of weapons--exceptions--penalties

(4) Exhibits, in the presence of one or more persons, any weapon readily capable of lethal use in an angry or threatening manner; or
Click to expand...

So I don't think they're going to win anything but a fine; jail would be nice.
 
jet57 said:
Sure, but did they commit a crime or were their civil rights violated?

You don't seem to know...

SS 571.030. — Unlawful use of weapons--exceptions--penalties. :: Chapter 571 — Weapons Offenses :: Title XXXVIII — CRIMES AND PUNISHMENT; PEACE OFFICERS AND PUBLIC DEFENDERS :: 2005 Missouri Revised Statutes :: Missouri Revised Statutes :: US Codes and Statutes :: US Law :: Justia



So I don't think they're going to win anything but a fine; jail would be nice.
Click to expand...

well you are on record saying they shouldn't be even able to own an AR 15, so you see them as criminals to start with. On top of that, there is an anti-gun prosecutor who is funded by Soros, who is instigating this nonsense. I guess we will see how it plays out.
 
TurtleDude said:
well you are on record saying they shouldn't be even able to own an AR 15, so you see them as criminals to start with. On top of that, there is an anti-gun prosecutor who is funded by Soros, who is instigating this nonsense. I guess we will see how it plays out.
Click to expand...

I'm betting the charges will be quietly dismissed once all the "outrage" dies down.
 
Rich2018 said:
No, it was really about your signature of "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) being represented by a fist


Hence my sarcastic comment: "That's how to become great, let's tell the Russians and Chinese..."
Click to expand...

And again, how is that particular fist in my signature triggering you? Other members have RAISED fists as their avatars and you don't seem to be bothered by that.
 
Court Jester said:
And again, how is that particular fist in my signature triggering you? Other members have RAISED fists as their avatars and you don't seem to be bothered by that.
Click to expand...

Because of who coined MAGA and your coupling of a fist (indicating establishment through force). It reminded me of Trump's assertion to claim back the streets through force...


And what with his recent denigration of China - and the general perception of Russia (not by Trump obviously), I sarcastically asked if you felt that Make China/Russia Great Again, coupled with a fist, might seem appropriate.
 
Moon said:
I'm betting the charges will be quietly dismissed once all the "outrage" dies down.
Click to expand...

Well there is the case of these people being defense attorneys. And most of what they do entails defending people who had dealings with the police. So because the police disregarded their second amendment rights I smell a lawsuit. And there should be, city and state governments should not be allowed to confiscate your firearms because of something they deem to be bad PR.
 
Rich2018 said:
Because of who coined MAGA and your coupling of a fist (indicating establishment through force).
Click to expand...

Are you 100% sure what that means?

Rich2018 said:
It reminded me of Trump's assertion to claim back the streets through force...
Click to expand...

In other words it triggered your feelings in a certain way. So what does that have to do with me?

Rich2018 said:
And what with his recent denigration of China - and the general perception of Russia (not by Trump obviously), I sarcastically asked if you felt that Make China/Russia Great Again, coupled with a fist, might seem appropriate.
Click to expand...

I'm not really concerned about Russia. Russia is only a regional power with certain energy interests in a very limited part of the middle east--- mostly in some parts of Syria.

China on the other hand has GLOBAL aspirations of power and is in a economic position to achieve that goal unless held in check. Russians will always act like Russians, that isn't anything new. But it is China who a stealing intellectual property, military secrets, and attempting to attack or corrupt our vital information systems.

Everything with you liberal Jan Bradys is always "Russia, Russia, Russia!"
 
Tanngrisnir said:
So you have no argument. Ther weren't threatened and, like you, they're cowards.

Nice.
Click to expand...

are they cowards because they decided to confront far more people than two, with arms? or are they cowards for not cutting down the protestors?
 
TurtleDude said:
are they cowards because they decided to confront far more people than two, with arms? or are they cowards for not cutting down the protestors?
Click to expand...

People seem to think that it's cowardly to have guns. I guess you are supposed to just stand there and take whatever anybody wants to inflict on you.
 
CLAX1911 said:
People seem to think that it's cowardly to have guns. I guess you are supposed to just stand there and take whatever anybody wants to inflict on you.
Click to expand...

They have the mobs and street thugs. We have the vast majority of people who are well trained shooters
 
It seems weird that no other neighbors on this street felt threatened.

Things that make you go hmmmmm
 
BlueTex said:
It seems weird that no other neighbors on this street felt threatened.

Things that make you go hmmmmm
Click to expand...
Oh they felt threatened alright - by the McCloskeys.
 
Rich2018 said:
What I posted earlier, it seems that, that lawyer's defense was that his AR-15's safety was on the whole time...
Click to expand...

No, I don't see why it would. Either they felt they were being threatened and were defending themselves, or they weren't.
 
TurtleDude said:
well you are on record saying they shouldn't be even able to own an AR 15, so you see them as criminals to start with. On top of that, there is an anti-gun prosecutor who is funded by Soros, who is instigating this nonsense. I guess we will see how it plays out.
Click to expand...

What really surprises me here is that big gummit did indeed enter someone's home and take their AR15 away, and you aren't screamin about it...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top Bottom