NGNM85
DP Veteran
- Joined
- May 3, 2011
- Messages
- 1,571
- Reaction score
- 700
- Location
- Boston, MA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
That's why I'm asking, too. I want to understand.
There's really no need for in-depth analysis. The opposition to same-sex marriage is, fundamentally, religious.
I didnt participate and its pointless to participate in any of them, because any points anti ssm individuals make, extorts the same pat answers from the same people, who cant present a real argument except for redundant sarcasm.
I didnt participate and its pointless to participate in any of them, because any points anti ssm individuals make, extorts the same pat answers from the same people, who cant present a real argument except for redundant sarcasm.
No, any points anti-SSMers make are demonstrated to be illogical, as they are, and then when the anti-SSMers are shown to have a loser position, they start to whine that folks are being mean.
So am I the only who can see both sides of the issue?
There is no logical reason to be against SSM.
Or in some cases we genuinely want to understand the other side and the logic behind their position.
Sometimes, though it depends on how the other side is being presented. If the presentation is without logic and presented in an attacking or degrading way, I stop caring.
And with further thought I need to say, the objections are silly. They are just as ridiculous as I made them appear.
No, any points anti-SSMers make are demonstrated to be illogical, as they are, and then when the anti-SSMers are shown to have a loser position, they start to whine that folks are being mean.
Still, your one of my favorite posters on herebut..no one wants to understand the other side, they want to just attack the other side ad nauseam with the same statements over and over...no one even pays attention to anyone that posts against it or what they say.
True colors in 3, 2, 1...
Is the idea of marriage really "logical" in the first place, or is it more emotional?
Read what I wrote.
So am I the only who can see both sides of the issue?
You were degrading. You attacked the other side as illogical losers who whine.
Strawman. This is about the logic behind denying the legal contract of marriage to LGBT people, not the logic of why people want to enter marriage.
So if YOU don't think their arguments have any merit, THEN it is ok to attack and degrade them.
Ok, now I see how you are not a hypocrite. Attacking and degrading is fine, as long as you are the one doing it.
If their position is illogical and has no evidence, I will demonstrate that as much as I choose to do. I will also point out behaviors that occur. If you do not like that... too bad.
Is see. So only one side should be held to pure logic? What does it accomplish to deny this is an emotional issue?
Same sex marriage or any type of marriage should not be a part of government. There should be no tax rewards for married couples. Marriage is a contract between two people why does the state of nation need to be involved in any of that. Nonsense.
What I do not like is you pretending to be all civilized and needing to turn away from the attacking and degrading arguments of the other side, only to present your own demonization.
Reading you is just like reading a rabid pro-lifer or anti-SSMer. Nothing but absolute claims and insults.
I don't think so. I can see the other side of the issue just fine. There are two points to it. One is based on belief, which I respect and have no issue discussing. The other is based on lack of logic and lack of evidence which I have a big issue with. I do not like misinformation being spread.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?