Squawker said:
You didn't let me down m/f .

m/f means my friend -- not that bad word. lol
Sorry for another edit folks -- when ya get older this happens.
Of these sites the best one, by far, that I've found is one that looks into Frankens words solely base on him. The one's, like the one you sourced, that attempt to prove that Franken lies and the people he's exposed as liars do not, don't check out so well. Everyone of them that I've fact check don't check out. "Franken’s lying about O'Reilly!" "Oh, and so is O'Reilly's own mother." That's just hilarious.
That cite also claims that O'Reilly really did come from a meager background and to prove they use the WP piece. Which states among other things:
"As for Dad never earning more than $35,000, what O'Reilly doesn't mention is that Dad retired in 1978, when a $35,000 income was the equivalent of $92,000 in today's dollars."
And...
"Bill Jr. and his younger sister, Janet; weren't exactly deprived, either. Both children attended private school, and the family sent Bill to Marist College, a private college in Poughkeepsie, N.Y., as well as the University of London for a year, without financial aid."
Sounds like things were tight alright.
But in regards to O'Reilly's statements regarding his background and his up bringing. Every quote I've read and every time I've heard O'Reilly speak of this, I've found that to him it's probably completely accurate that he had "a meager up bringing." I mean think about it. The guy's currently bringing in somewhere between 7.5 and 13 million a year (last I checked). I don't think it's a far stretch for someone making that kind of income to now say "hey, I wasn't always well to do." "I come from really modest means." So, I don't think O'Reilly lying when he makes those statements.
I think where he got himself into trouble is when he padded those statements and claimed he was from even more meager means. And in an attempt to emphasize that he fabricated where he actually lived. Then when called on it he, at first, tried to claim he never said he was from Levittown. Then when called on that he tried to claim they’re both the same place. Then when called on that he brings out a deed, that he won’t actually let anyone examine, and now claims that they’re not the same place but he’s really from the place he originally claimed to be from. At this point he’s on video making so many different statement regarding this he’s basically lying about where he’s from and then lying about lying about it. He must be taking lessons from Ann coulter.
I wish I'd hadn't had a computer crash and lost all my book marks. I had a site that looked into Franken , his statements, and numbers and stats he uses for stuff. If I get some time I’ll go see if I can find it again. I think you’d find it interesting. They made some good points. Which is why I originally stated that it’s completely possible that Franken is lying about stuff. And that I think it’s completely possible that they’re all lying to us. But really the fact that he may be lying doesn’t some how prove that some one else isn’t lying. And these cites that attempt to make that connection or use that logic have, in my experience, never fact checked out.