- Joined
- Sep 6, 2022
- Messages
- 7,432
- Reaction score
- 8,264
- Location
- North Idaho
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
DCCougar said:
A brief review of the article you link to reveals that your rendition of this story is inexcusably false and misleading. Basically, you lay blame on the wrong organization.
Let's review. You start this thread with the following:It says exactly what I wrote, a month before the fatal attack that killed Kline the city passed a resolution banning the use of euthanasia for dangerous dogs
In reading your second link from the OP, there's no mention of "animal rights extremists" here "taking over local animal shelters which are taxpayer funded." Instead, it says:This is a topic that doesn’t get enough attention, how animal “rights” extremists have taken over local animal shelters which are taxpayer funded and used them as platforms to advance agendas like “no kill” policies which directly lead to often fatal harm to the public.
So it was the City Council, not the local animal shelter, and there's no mention of any organization being "taken over" by animal rights extremists.Spokane City Council passed an ordinance regulating euthanization laws at SCRAPS in Monday night's meeting. This comes after the shelter euthanized 14 dogs Wednesday.
The parents should have done some thinking. It is a sad story but I can't blame the dog.Nice victim blaming you got going there.
The parents should have done some thinking. It is a sad story but I can't blame the dog.
In this case however the animal rights extremists didn’t need to take over the shelter, they got the city council to pass a law mandating dangerous animals not be euthanizedLet's review. You start this thread with the following:
In reading your second link from the OP, there's no mention of "animal rights extremists" here "taking over local animal shelters which are taxpayer funded." Instead, it says:
So it was the City Council, not the local animal shelter, and there's no mention of any organization being "taken over" by animal rights extremists.
Your first link goes to dogsbite.org, which has been criticized for publishing misleading or inaccurate information. A link within that article reveals that an employee who was fired from the animal shelter "after an argument" contacted the local news media claiming that dogs were being "executed." The shelter justified their actions by saying that the dogs were euthanized "because they were an untreatable threat. And that's a public safety risk," noting that "many of the dogs assessed had histories of dangerous bites and aggressive tendencies."
Just trying to get the story straight.
Well, from the reporting, it sounds like the only "extremist" was one guy who used to work at the shelter who had an "argument" there, got fired, and went and reported his disgruntledness to the local media.In this case however the animal rights extremists didn’t need to take over the shelter, they got the city council to pass a law mandating dangerous animals not be euthanized
Lies, both of the above. It seems as if everyone who disagrees with your flawed worldviews is automatically labeled by yourself as an "extremist," does not make for a credible argument. As to mandating dangerous dogs not be euthanized, post the ordinance so we can see your lie for ourselves.In this case however the animal rights extremists didn’t need to take over the shelter, they got the city council to pass a law mandating dangerous animals not be euthanized
Yes.
It doesn't matter if it's a puppy like the one that attacked me and left a scar on my upper thigh or if it's a full grown one that destroyed the hand of the girlfriend of a friend of mine.
The only good pit bull is one with a bullet hole between its eyes.
My first reaction.You got attacked … by a puppy?
I don't think so...unless that picture was taken 30 years ago. Also, I remember the dog being a lighter shade of brown.
I take your point, but the assumption that the victim did not initiate the attack is not clear. It is a tragic part of pet ownership that young children can invade a animals space and invite retaliation. When an animal retaliates they go to their 'lizard brain' and a pits retaliation will be far worse than a chihuahua's.I agree with you wholeheartedly.
However, by the time the dog gets to the shelter, the dog isn't always capable of being socialized. Some are irreparably damaged as was the clear case with the Pitbull who went out for adoption, killing a four-year-old child. Someone or some at the shelter seriously failed the family who adopted this dog because those in charge of making sure he was ready for adoption seriously screwed up. This dog was clearly unsociable and unadoptable.
The problem is that Pit Bulls are responsible for two thirds of fatal dog attacks.Absolutely toxic responses to a dog bite.
So you've been carrying a grudge for 30 years? That's sad, imho.I don't think so...unless that picture was taken 30 years ago. Also, I remember the dog being a lighter shade of brown.
No. Not carrying a grudge, but I have been staying away from pit bulls.So you've been carrying a grudge for 30 years? That's sad, imho.
The problem is that irresponsible owners and breeders are responsible foe ALL dog attacks. It's a human problem my friend. Fess up to that fact.The problem is that Pit Bulls are responsible for two thirds of fatal dog attacks.
Yet you still see it necessary to blame you hatred of the breed on an event that happened 30 tears ago, otherwise why would you bother to bring it up?No. Not carrying a grudge, but I have been staying away from pit bulls.
Considering how well canines can sense human emotions, that's probably best for both of you.I see that as a smart thing to do.
Nice try, but this isn't about me. I love dogs and get along very well with them.Yet you still see it necessary to blame you hatred of the breed on an event that happened 30 tears ago, otherwise why would you bother to bring it up?
Considering how well canines can sense human emotions, that's probably best for both of you.
No. Not carrying a grudge, but I have been staying away from pit bulls.
I see that as a smart thing to do.
So you say. Your words prove otherwise, and you most assuredly made this about you.Nice try, but this isn't about me. I love dogs and get along very well with them.
Anectdotals by an anonymous poster have no credibility.I gave two personal examples of behavior by pit bulls. I could provide you with a lot more examples that other people have experienced.
The only undeniable fact here is your hatred and ignorance of the breed.The undeniable fact is that pit bulls are a dangerous breed and should be wiped from the face of the earth.
I can't agree that it's the fault of anyone at the shelter. They get in a dog, and the entire time the environment is nothing like it would be in a home. They can only evaluate what they see, and what they see in the shelter is often not like what an adopted family will see after the adjustment period. This is such a truism that there's a 3-3-3 rule that estimates the time for an adopted dog to start showing his true personality. The shelter will never see that, because the environment is so overwhelming for many dogs.I agree with you wholeheartedly.
However, by the time the dog gets to the shelter, the dog isn't always capable of being socialized. Some are irreparably damaged as was the clear case with the Pitbull who went out for adoption, killing a four-year-old child. Someone or some at the shelter seriously failed the family who adopted this dog because those in charge of making sure he was ready for adoption seriously screwed up. This dog was clearly unsociable and unadoptable.
WRONG. You have no basis for saying that.The problem is that irresponsible owners and breeders are responsible foe ALL dog attacks.
Other than common sense you mean?WRONG. You have no basis for saying that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?