- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 41,104
- Reaction score
- 12,202
- Location
- South Carolina
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Kansas Senate hopeful Greg Orman insists that he is not beholden to the Democratic Party, but a major Democratic donor is hosting a fundraiser for his campaign to unseat Republican incumbent Sen. Pat Roberts.
http://freebeacon.com/politics/soros-to-host-fundraiser-for-independent-kansas-senate-candidate/
God, the right wings obsession with Soros is almost as bad as the Left Wings obsession with the Koch brothers.
Good. Pat Roberts has no place to represent Kansans especially since he lives in VIRGINIA.
He's a Nazi that helped hunt down Jews during Holocaust and a convicted criminal. Why wouldn't someone crticize him?
He's a Nazi that helped hunt down Jews during Holocaust and a convicted criminal.
So here we have one of the most blatant of Liberal/Progressive political deception, and outright lie in today's political climate. Greg Orman has all kinds of ads on Kansas TV, promising, that he is not a democrat, even though up until this election cycle he WAS exactly that.
Now, enter Soros. He needs to get his money into his stooge running against Roberts so at the very least he can fracture the vote, to give the liberal a chance. So, does Soros come right out and make it clear that he is backing this faux independent? No.
Soros thinks so little of the American voter, and thinks they are so stupid that he sends his son to do the fundraising, so that if any question comes up he at least has the narrowest of denials of involvement....
Crap like this, coupled with demo's long time election fraud of using absentee ballots to tip elections, and the outright corruption we see today from liberals in the process, my question is will the American electorate wake up? I don't know.
If I 'm elected, there’s a reasonable chance that neither party would have a majority in the US Senate. If that is the case, I will work with the other independent Senators to caucus with the party that is most willing to face our country’s difficult problems head on and advance our problem-solving, non-partisan agenda.
When it comes time to support a candidate for Majority Leader, I' ll encourage both parties to select a leader who has a demonstrated track record of working across the aisle as one indicator of his or her willingness to solve problems. I 'll also look at responsible leaders from both sides like Democrat Heidi Heitkamp and Republican Lisa Murkowski who are willing to cross party lines to vote for what is right.Both Harry Reid and Mitch McConnell have been too partisan for far too long to earn my vote for Majority Leader.
With that said, if one party is clearly in the majority, I will seek to caucus with the party that was in the majority as that would be in the best interest of the state of Kansas.But caucusing with a party does not mean voting with them on every issue. My vote to caucus with a party is dependent on their willingness to seek common-ground solutions to our nation' s problems. That means I will vote on each bill individually,based on the content of the proposed legislation.My first and only allegiance is to the people of Kansas -- not a political party -- so should the caucus I join fall into bad behavior, I will represent the people of Kansas appropriately and vote on the merits of the legislation instead of how party bosses demand. I will always seek common sense solutions while maintaining my independence from either the Republicans or Democrats.
So, you would rather a Nazi sympathizer in our congress?
So, you would rather a Nazi sympathizer in our congress?
Did you get that from the same chain email that says Obama is a Muslim?
So, you would rather a Nazi sympathizer in our congress?
Did you get that from the same chain email that says Obama is a Muslim?
he Jewish Council asked the little kids to hand out the deportation notices. I was told to go to the Jewish Council. And there I was given these small slips of paper ... It said report to the rabbi seminary at 9 am ... And I was given this list of names. I took this piece of paper to my father. He instantly recognized it. This was a list of Hungarian Jewish lawyers. He said, "You deliver the slips of paper and tell the people that if they report they will be deported."[18]
Soros did not return to that job, but instead went into hiding the next day
God, the right wings obsession with Soros is almost as bad as the Left Wings obsession with the Koch brothers.
Yep it is isn't it? Bet that won't stop some of the usual suspects from using the Koch meme in every circumstance though will it? Right Jet?
Right Jet?
Well that is about the most lame, cheap, and kinda in a way vile attempt to smear some one for something that they in fact had exactly jack and **** to do with I have seen on this board. And maybe you can explain how Jonathan Soros was involved with the nazi party when he was born in 1970? I would be interested in hearing that.
He doesn't even realize that the fundraiser is not George Soros, but his son. Now, J Mack carefully did not include that detail in his OP, but it is clearly mentioned in the source opinion piece.
And that has what to do with me exactly?
So you want to be just like those people? That's it, aim high J Mac!
Just responding to your post....Why so defensive?
:lamo
1.)George Soros isnt running for office
2.)Geroge Soros wasnt a "Nazi sympathizer"
3.)Joe Soros is the one donating
4.)Greg Orman is not a "Nazi sympathizer"
I bet you wouldn't say that if a Conservative hanging with a Nazi Jew hunter.
Do you remember the thread about the Republican congress critter that was a WW2 reenactor and did an SS impression? The Libbos went nuts!
George Soros was not a nazi.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?