I suppose that depends on what one's criteria is for backing up statements. There are some among us who feel it's ok to say elections are stolen without evidence, or that people are gang members without evidence. Isn't so much easier to make accusations without backing it up?
True. @TamleeB literally believes that the Haitians of Springfield, Ohio are Eating the Cats and her evidence is that an obese adulterer from Florida told it to her on television. These MAGA can be made to believe all sorts of wacky things.I suppose that depends on what one's criteria is for backing up statements. There are some among us who feel it's ok to say elections are stolen without evidence, or that people are gang members without evidence. Isn't so much easier to make accusations without backing it up?
Yeah, then again we have a sourpuss who still stands by the "they stole the election from me, precious!" narrative so...
truth hurts.
Nah…that is on you. I said what I said. Apparently you don’t want to engage in a discussion regarding what I said. It’s all good. I understand.
Nah, that is on you. I said what I said. Apparently you don't want to engage in a discussion with a fellow MAGA which could put you in Donald's metaphorical cross-hairs for disloyal behavior. It's okay. I understand your fear.Nah…that is on you. I said what I said. Apparently you don’t want to engage in a discussion regarding what I said. It’s all good. I understand.
Even Ted Cruz was forced to kissed the ring, so it's not as though we can expect more demonstrated courage from a random MAGA foot soldier.Glad you agree. Yes indeed there was violence.
"aBsOLute ViOLenCE:
Sure. I never one time mentioned anything about elections being stolen. So…let’s address your inability to provide any evidence that the proud boys were involved in the riots and violence in LA. I am totally open….I suppose that depends on what one's criteria is for backing up statements. There are some among us who feel it's ok to say elections are stolen without evidence, or that people are gang members without evidence. Isn't so much easier to make accusations without backing it up?
I do? I am totally open to you providing evidence of your claim. Please show where I ever said Haitians were eating cats? Surely you would never say such a thing if you didn’t have clear evidence to back up you claim, correct? If you are unable to do so, then that would make you a liar.
It's a license to drive through and away from a mob threatening you and your family. and, in that scenario, that's the right thing to do, just as it was the right thing to shoot Ashli Babbit. You don't give up your right to life or liberty just because someone else has a political grievance, though you can lose it if you threaten others over grievances of your own.
No, it's your inability to publicly disagree with Donald Trump that is telling. If he tells you that they're eating the cats, the likes of you certainly aren't going to disagree. If he tells you that he actually won 2020, it's not like @TamleeB has the fortitude to openly cross him. So, the rest of us are left wondering, "if this poster lacks the spine to disagree with Donald on anything he says, while praising him or running cover for him every time he makes another lie, then either the poster believes in those lies, or the truth doesn't actually matter to the poster." And thus, we lose all interest in ever bothering to "explain" anything to you, since you don't actually care what anybody says unless it's Donald who says it.
Go ahead and try to publicly disagree with Donald. He's watching. Go ahead. Show us some of that @TamleeB fortitude.I do? I am totally open to you providing evidence of your claim. Please show where I ever said Haitians were eating cats? Surely you would never say such a thing if you didn’t have clear evidence to back up you claim, correct? If you are unable to do so, then that would make you a liar.
I am open. I have no fear. None whatsoever. Your absolute foolishness is noted, and dismissed.Nah, that is on you. I said what I said. Apparently you don't want to engage in a discussion with a fellow MAGA which could put you in Donald's metaphorical cross-hairs for disloyal behavior. It's okay. I understand your fear.
Awww….but if you had done your due diligence you would see I have disagreed with Trump over the years. What I see here is your inability to actually research before you post. Anywho…this has been fun.
I have disagreed with him numerous times in the past. Is there something in particular you want me to disagree with? Be specific.Go ahead and try to publicly disagree with Donald. He's watching. Go ahead. Show us some of that @TamleeB fortitude.
If you are referring to me I would appreciate you providing evidence of such. Good luck.
So what has this to do with the current situation?
What “truth”? Please be specific in your response.
You seem to have missed the point I made, and for some reason think I mentioned you at all, either directly or indirectly.
I'm not. If I were I would have tagged you like I did the last time, but come to think of it you made a mess out of that as well and claimed I had no integrity. So confusing.If you are referring to me I would appreciate you providing evidence of such. Good luck.
Hilarious….you jumped on the thread that was about me. Funny how now you are pretending to be coy.
LOL you better stay close to your fainting couch
When Donald Trump told the American People that the Haitians of Springfield, Ohio were eating the cats of the people who live there, was this a lie? Was he wrong to say it? Was this the kind of behavior that would give you cause, however little, to question his suitability for the highest office in the land? And if it was the case for any of these things, then on any single thread where the topic came up in a specific conversation with you (and we can see from your post history that it has), was your impulse to set the record straight on your disagreement with Trump's claim, or to defend his and/or your honor instead?