• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Some far-left groups have encouraged peaceful protests to turn violent, experts say

Hilarious….you jumped on the thread that was about me. Funny how now you are pretending to be coy. :ROFLMAO:
Oh I'm not being coy at all, since I'm usually more direct even when I'm coy. I was actually referring to Trump as the sourpuss who's still complaining about the election being stolen. Oh, and the thread is not about you.
 
I'm not. If I were I would have tagged you like I did the last time, but come to think of it you made a mess out of that as well and claimed I had no integrity. So confusing.
Like I said you jumped on a response with my name being mentioned and replied
“Yeah, then again we have a sourpuss who still stands by the "they stole the election from me, precious!" narrative so...”
Who exactly were you referring to who, since the post clearly referred to me? I open to hearing whomever you were referencing.
 
Tell that to rightwing nutjobs, like Governor DeSantis:

"If you’re driving on one of those streets and a mob comes and surrounds your vehicle and threatens you, you have a right to flee for your safety. And so if you drive off and you hit one of these people, that’s their fault for impinging on you."​

If that isn't a license to kill protesters, what is?

If protesters/rioters surround you and try to get in your vehicle, you bet you should leave, whether or not you may hit pedestrians. One has a right to self preservation. We’ve seen as much during the BLM protests.
 
Like I said you jumped on a response with my name being mentioned and replied
“Yeah, then again we have a sourpuss who still stands by the "they stole the election from me, precious!" narrative so...”
Who exactly were you referring to who, since the post clearly referred to me? I open to hearing whomever you were referencing.
Here's where understanding the use of bold comes in, and that's where I bolded the sentence about the MAGA and referred to the one who still complains about the election. If I were referring to you, I would have tagged you specifically.
 
Like I said you jumped on a response with my name being mentioned and replied
“Yeah, then again we have a sourpuss who still stands by the "they stole the election from me, precious!" narrative so...”
Who exactly were you referring to who, since the post clearly referred to me? I open to hearing whomever you were referencing.
I assumed he was referring to the pantheon of MAGA on this site who to this day insist that the 2020 election was stolen. One even claims to have incontrovertible proof although he's never gotten around to sharing it. Basically, the people that you go out of your away to avoid openly disagreeing with, because disagreeing with your fellow soldiers who claim the 2020 election was stolen is a surefire ticket to RINO status.
 
When Donald Trump told the American People that the Haitians of Springfield, Ohio were eating the cats of the people who live there, was this a lie? Was he wrong to say it? Was this the kind of behavior that would give you cause, however little, to question his suitability for the highest office in the land? And if it was the case for any of these things, then on any single thread where the topic came up in a specific conversation with you (and we can see from your post history that it has), was your impulse to set the record straight on your disagreement with Trump's claim, or to defend his and/or your honor instead?
I don’t know if Hatians were eating cats or not, do you? I never backed up Trumps claim, did I? Yet you accused me of doing such. So how about you set the record straight and admit that you were incorrect in your assumption. You owe me an apology for your false claim.
 
Here's where understanding the use of bold comes in, and that's where I bolded the sentence about the MAGA and referred to the one who still complains about the election. If I were referring to you, I would have tagged you specifically.
Ahh…..you responded to a post that clearly was about me. I do find you games fun. I am in. It’s all good. Let’s keep playing. :ROFLMAO:
 




Sucks. We have enough violence in the United States already. No need to push for more.
Extremists are more likely to be violent. Luckily, there are far more self identified moderates in the Democratic base than the Republican base.
 
I assumed he was referring to the pantheon of MAGA on this site who to this day insist that the 2020 election was stolen. One even claims to have incontrovertible proof although he's never gotten around to sharing it. Basically, the people that you go out of your away to avoid openly disagreeing with, because disagreeing with your fellow soldiers who claim the 2020 election was stolen is a surefire ticket to RINO status.
Well, I was hoping what I wrote in quotes would have made who I was referring to, since I wrote "they stole the election from me!" which would apply to the person whom the election was stolen from versus "they stole the election from us!" The devil is always in the details.
;)
 
I don’t know if Hatians were eating cats or not, do you? I never backed up Trumps claim, did I? Yet you accused me of doing such. So how about you set the record straight and admit that you were incorrect in your assumption. You owe me an apology for your false claim.
You are being intellectually dishonest. We know for a fact that the claims they were eating people’s pets were a complete fabrication.
 
assumed he was referring to the pantheon of MAGA on this site who to this day insist that the 2020 election was stolen. One even claims to have incontrovertible proof although he's never gotten around to sharing it. Basically, the people that you go out of your away to avoid openly disagreeing with, because disagreeing with your fellow soldiers who claim the 2020 election was stolen is a surefire ticket to RINO status.
You “assumed”. :ROFLMAO: Of course you did. Yet you cannot offer any actual evidence to back up your assumptions. I find that pathetic
 
Ahh…..you responded to a post that clearly was about me. I do find you games fun. I am in. It’s all good. Let’s keep playing. :ROFLMAO:
The ego is a powerful drug, one so powerful it didn't allow you to discern what I was saying and instead made you ignore what I wrote. But sure, let's keep playing. I'll dig a ditch, and you can jump into it.
:)
 
I don’t know if Hatians were eating cats or not, do you? I never backed up Trumps claim, did I? Yet you accused me of doing such. So how about you set the record straight and admit that you were incorrect in your assumption. You owe me an apology for your false claim.
As I said, you are incapable of publicly crossing either Donald nor his fellow soldiers. And that's okay. If Ted Cruz couldn't do it, well, he's a tough US Senator, and you're just a foot soldier for Donald. You're certainly not going to cross him.

Anyhow, Donald will be promulgating another lie shortly, so you'd best go and get prepared to run air cover for him. Remember, if the media hasn't issued you talking points when it happens, it's always safe to deflect to Joe Biden.
 
Some far right groups have been screeching for civil war for, well, as long as I can remember
 
You are being intellectually dishonest. We know for a fact that the claims they were eating people’s pets were a complete fabrication.
And? I was being referred to as someone who claimed that. I didn’t make that claim. So if you have a problem with false claims I suggest you take it up with the actual person who made the claim. So….NO I am not in anyway being intellectually dishonest.
 
Yeah. Destruction of property and violence are never acceptable forms of protest.

View attachment 67574502
boston-massacre-gettyimages-640266037

If the left wants to turn this into a civil war, well.

You can try that. No crying later, though.
 
You are being intellectually dishonest. We know for a fact that the claims they were eating people’s pets were a complete fabrication.
@TamleeB is not permitted to believe that the claims were a complete fabrication because that would be an expression of disloyalty to Donald Trump made right here in public, in front of numerous other MAGA who are watching. That takes courage. There are only a handful of actual conservatives on this site with that kind of courage. She sadly is not one of them.
 
As I said, you are incapable of publicly crossing either Donald nor his fellow soldiers. And that's okay. If Ted Cruz couldn't do it, well, he's a tough US Senator, and you're just a foot soldier for Donald. You're certainly not going to cross him.

Anyhow, Donald will be promulgating another lie shortly, so you'd best go and get prepared to run air cover for him. Remember, if the media hasn't issued you talking points when it happens, it's always safe to deflect to Joe Biden.
I am fine with your assertion, as incorrect as it is. I have disagreed with Trump many times. I will never sell my soul to ANY politician. Perhaps in time, you find a way to do the same.
 
Tell that to rightwing nutjobs, like Governor DeSantis:

"If you’re driving on one of those streets and a mob comes and surrounds your vehicle and threatens you, you have a right to flee for your safety. And so if you drive off and you hit one of these people, that’s their fault for impinging on you."​

If that isn't a license to kill protesters, what is?
Seems your reading comprehension is not all that good
Because that is most definitely not a license to kill protesters.
 
@TamleeB is not permitted to believe that the claims were a complete fabrication because that would be an expression of disloyalty to Donald Trump made right here in public, in front of numerous other MAGA who are watching. That takes courage. There are only a handful of actual conservatives on this site with that kind of courage. She sadly is not one of them.
How odd that you keep referencing me. If I didn’t know better I would think you might be craving attention. At this point I do find your post very humorous. You are so dishonest I can’t even be sure that what you are telling me are lies. ;)
 
Some far right groups have been screeching for civil war for, well, as long as I can remember
This is not exclusive to the right.

To the point of the article this thread is based on.
 
Back
Top Bottom