Glen Contrarian
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2013
- Messages
- 17,688
- Reaction score
- 8,046
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
1. Not true. No one had universal health care before Germany in the late 1800s. Canada just got theirs 30 years ago. Wrong to say that others have always had it. US basically got it in 1965 but gradually lost it and with the PPACA we took a tiny step forward but at a cost of ending the debate for many years now. No politician talks about it nowadays.
2. Not sure where you got this rather bold statement. It is hard to find good historical data by country. NY Times reported that globally income inequality has been going down but, yes, in many developed countries it is going up.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/20/u...is-not-rising-globally-its-falling-.html?_r=0
3. Your data on crime goes to 2014. I was referring to the more recent, post Ferguson, spike in crime.
4. We are going down compared to other countries in several categories, such as percent of population with college degrees and economic freedoms.
The polling that I have seen indicates that historically high percentages of Americans believe that the US is losing ground.
https://knoema.com/atlas/ranks/Index-of-economic-freedom
I think when growth in domestic prosperity and impact on world affairs are considered, one would have to pick the '80's.
As an outsider, I would say that it would be the early 50s to the middle 60s. That was the US glory days.. dragging it self and the world out of a ditch, but then it went slowly the wrong way. Before WW2 the US was nothing, and since Nixon it has been in steady decline politically and economically. The real decline started with Reagan and excelerated with Bush 2. It fits the pattern of all empires, just in a much smaller time frame.
If he only referencing before we were $19.4 trillion in debt, that would be enough.
Between 1950 and 1975 comes to mind.
Extreme debt is a major drag.
Our current economy is "garbage"???? We're STILL in what is BY FAR the longest stretch of private-sector job growth in ALL American history...but that's garbage to you. Our unemployment rate (using the same metric as the past twenty years or so) is below 5%...but that's garbage to you. The percentage of Americans without health insurance is lower than at ANY time in ALL American history...but that's garbage to you.
Is our economy perfect? Of course not - there's no such thing as a "perfect economy" (not as long as there are human beings involved). There's still problems - but the only time our economy has been "better off" was during the last time we had a Democrat in the White House - the economic boom of the mid- to late-1990's. And before you try to argue that other periods were better economically, look at the frequency of recessions, look at the unemployment rates, look at the poverty rates, and look at the health insurance coverage percentages.
You talk about our international influence and prestige - the finger points directly at Obama's predecessor, the guy who lied the nation into invading Iraq when that nation presented NO threat against America, the guy who approved torture - TORTURE! - and the guy who led our nation into the worst economic crisis in eighty years...and who handed Obama the worst s**t sandwich any incoming president has EVER had (not just an economy in full meltdown, but our two longest wars, both of which were highly unpopular and costing us $10B in taxpayer dollars per MONTH). Bush 43 screwed the pooch big time...and Obama's spent much of the past eight years cleaning up the mess Bush left.
Oh, wait, I forgot! In Right Wing Fantasy World, Obama shoulda been able wave a magic wand and make everything all better again overnight, and because Obama didn't fix the world and make everything perfect, he's automatically the worst president ever!
And how many hundred thousands died before the Brits and French learned? One would think after the sixth or seventh failed offensive they'd try something new.
The ANZACS essentially got pushed off a cliff into a meat grinder at Gallipoli. The British High Command didn't exactly think that one all the way through every either. Lots of wishful thinking there.
Guess what - it wasn't the Americans who invented the tank. It wasn't the Americans who invented the doctrine of combined-arms assault. Those were both British inventions. When we arrived, we began using 1914 tactics and were sending our troops into concentrated machine-gun fire - we hadn't had the chance to learn what the European nations had learned the hard way.
You mentioned Gallipoli - it seems that you agree that it wasn't a fault of the quality of the ANZACs, that it was the fault, more than anyone else, of the British admirals who were unwilling to risk their capital ships where two had been sunk by mines...and so they did not give the ANZACs the fire support they so desperately needed.
If you really study the war, what we DID do was provide a great deal of industrial capacity (and nearly bankrupted France and England in the process). That, and what we DID do was by the very fact that the Germans knew we were beginning to send troops to France at the rate of 10,000 per day (Napoleon once said that "Quantity has a quality all its own."), the Germans knew that if they didn't do something NOW ('now' being in the first quarter of 1918), that the overwhelming numbers of allied troops (not only Americans, but also hundreds of thousands from French and British colonies) would end any chance that Germany had of winning the war. Thus, they designed what they called "Das Kaiserschlact" - the Kaiser's Battle. It was the end of trench warfare, and was devastating for both sides. The Americans made significant contributions, but it was the heroic defense by the British and the French - and the counterattack by Foch's twenty divisions that he'd held back despite the howls for "more troops!" by the British - that finally stopped the Germans.
No, we didn't win the war. We were an important part of winning the war - but then, so were the Italians, for keeping hundreds of thousands of Germans and Austrio-Hungarians tied up in the south, and so was the sacrifice of so many Russians, for this kept the Germans from being able to apply their full strength in the western front.
We Americans are taught that we saved the world because 'Merica; unfortunately, at the same time we are never taught the equally-crucial (or, in the cases of Britain and France in WWI and the Soviet Union in WWII, infinitely MORE crucial) parts that our allied nations played in doing the same thing.
Those first tank models were...... "Problematic" would be putting it generously. One French model had a huge frontal portion causing it to get stuck when it tried to cross trenches. British tanks ran the risk of wiping out their entire crews from the gases every time they were sent out. German tanks were essentially barns that had armored strapped on.
I do agree it wasn't the fault of the ANZACs.
The Austro-Hungarians were basically useless. My great grandfather was a calvary officer in their army--- I still don't know how the hell he survived. The fact remains, however, that they spent more time trying to stave off total collapse then doing much useful.
The Russians......the less that can be said there, the better.
By the time of the last German hurrah they were out of the war.
Ah, you were doing so well. I think the first half of your post is exactly right--the 40's, the 50's and the early 60's would strike me as the most nostalgic period of modern American history. The decline, of course, started with Johnson (whom you liberals always conveniently forget to mention). Vietnam was his war, and the turmoil that war caused is what started the decline.
I disagree. You're referring to the last years of Jim Crow, of segregation; the Korean War; the Red Scare; McCarthyism; a much lower percentage of population covered by health insurance than today; a lower national rate of literacy than today...
...no, the 1950's are a great example of how many look back to the good old days, never realizing that those days weren't so good after all.
In that time frame was the Japanese internment, segregation, Jim Crow (until 1964), the Red Scare, McCarthyism, the Selma march (which came after the Selma bombing), abortion was illegal until 1972...
...no, that stretch of time was not a greater time for the American people. Maybe it was for white men...but that's about it.
More died under Johnson by a fairly significant margin. Nixons first year in office, 1969, was by far his worst for US casualties, but any honest appraisal (not that I expect one from you) would recognize the fact that the 1969 casualty figures were already baked into a quagmire Nixon inherited from Johnson.LOL Yet more Americans died in Vietnam under Nixon.
The limited liberal mind quickly runs out of intellectual ammo so it jumps from outright lies to accusations of racism. Perhaps as you mature and your brain develops you will acquire an ability to engage in honest discussion of issues. But I don't hold out much hope. Best of luck.The Civil Rights act was passed under Johnson. Perhaps that is what you meant by the start of the decline.
Never mind that the homicide and violent crime rates were higher every year under Reagan than they were ANY year under Obama. Not only that, but under Obama we're STILL in what is BY FAR the longest stretch of private-sector job growth in ALL American history.
And let's not forget that Reagan saddled us with trickle-down economics...which is STILL what we've got today, what Bush 41 rightly called "voodoo economics". Every penny of budget deficit we've had since 1980 is due in significant part to Reaganomics - because THAT was when we started down the road of out-of-control deficits.
Impact on world affairs? How many regimes did Reagan overthrow or attempt to overthrow? I didn't know it at the time, but my ship was a part of one of those efforts. And then there's Iran-Contra.
And let's not forget his opening speech at Philadelphia, MS - which most people realized was an effort to reach out to the racists. And before you try to claim otherwise, remember his "welfare queen" fairy tale.
Pick ANY era... and one can find negatives. On balance, the 50s were a pretty good time for the country.Back during the days of segregation? Of McCarthyism? Of the Red Scare and Sputnik? Of General MacArthur publicly condemning Truman for stopping him from dropping atomic bombs in the Korean War (and becoming a Republican hero for saying so)? I don't think so.
Yeah, if only we could go back to those days when the top marginal tax rate was 90%...until Reagan slashed them to 25% and we've been in thrall to Reaganomics ever since.
But what the Russians did do was to keep hundreds of thousands of Germans on the eastern front for three years...that's three years that those armies and their logistical support could have been sent to the west, instead. In fact, IIRC, at one of the crucial points in the battle of Verdun, the French were pleading with the Russians to counterattack - the Russians did so, and the Germans sent (again, IIRC) an entire army corps from the Verdun salient to Russia...and this took some of the pressure off the French, just as was intended.
And when it comes to the tanks, you're describing the early models. The later models were much more effective, and German General von Ludendorf himself said the use of light tanks (less well armored, but faster) and "tanks that carried infantry" (the first APC's) were major factors in his losses in 1918.
It all depends on your point of view.
I believe that America's greatest days will be in the future.
Those who think that they lie in the past should get to work on a time machine.
:lol:
This time wasting thread asks a question that can't be answered from the options provided.
Unless you were black, Hispanic, Asian, a woman, gay, poor, Jewish, elderly.... Did I leave anyone out?Pick ANY era... and one can find negatives. On balance, the 50s were a pretty good time for the country.
This was a confirmation of my point, right?Unless you were black, Hispanic, Asian, a woman, gay, poor, Jewish, elderly.... Did I leave anyone out?
The present day United States could kick the ass of any previous United States.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?