- Joined
- Aug 7, 2016
- Messages
- 7,489
- Reaction score
- 2,913
- Location
- Florida.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
Cool, we get it. You hate guns and you think anyone who owns one is a psychopath.Pity California couldn't prohibited all Glocks.
Cool, we get it. You hate guns and you think anyone who owns one is a psychopath.Pity California couldn't prohibited all Glocks.
She'd be familiar enough to submit it in a court proceeding and get a conviction.Being a prosecutor does it mean she's familiar with firearms.
I have a hard time believing anything that she says
I'm not sure models come up in thatShe'd be familiar enough to submit it in a court proceeding and get a conviction.
And you're ****ed if you pick the wrong moment to do a mag exchange.A magazine disconnect is actually unsafe since accidently dropping your magazine makes the gun unable to protect you.
Typical liberal socialist.Too bad that the state of CA regards all Glocks as “unsafe” weapons. In fact, only Gen 3 Glocks are legal to own in CA since they are grandfathered in.
“"Note that California law classifies ALL Glocks as 'unsafe handguns' because they do not have a compliant chamber load indicator, lack a magazine disconnect mechanism, and until our lawsuit caused California to repeal the requirement, of course lacked microstamping," Kostas Moros, an attorney with Michel & Associates representing the California Rifle & Pistol Association, posted on X."The only reason we can still buy Gen 3s is because they are grandfathered in, but they are still 'unsafe handguns,'" Moros continued. "We can't buy more modern Glocks new in gun stores (just secondhand from exempt cops, or from those who moved here with them from other states). She supported the Unsafe Handgun Act and expanded it such that microstamping began to be enforced in 2013. So why does she own an 'unsafe handgun'?"”
I wonder if she bought it before or after she supported the 2005 Proposition H that banned all handguns in San Francisco?
![]()
Kamala Harris’s Previous Support for a Ban on Handguns Highlights the Gun-Control Movement’s Broader Aims | National Review
Harris wants gun control, and she’ll go where the pickings are easiest.www.nationalreview.com
Guns for me but not for thee. Some pigs are more equal than other in CA.
Maybe she has a Glock “giggle switch” to go with her cackle? (BTW, that last comment was sarcasm for our gun control brethren)
The wrong model firearm can throw a case. Hell, the wrong serial number of the same model firearm can throw a case.I'm not sure models come up in that
Cool, we get it. You hate guns and you think anyone who owns one is a psychopath.
Yeah you didn't have to have knowledge of firearms to prosecute.The wrong model firearm can throw a case. Hell, the wrong serial number of the same model firearm can throw a case.
Ok, to clarify what I mean when I say that she would at least be somewhat knowledgeable of firearms is "your Honor, the accused killed Mrs. Smith with this 1911 .45 caliber pistol found at the scene of the crime with the bullets found in Mrs. Smith's head matching pistol with the accused fingerprints all over it." I'm not saying that she would rival the likes of Jerry Miculek or Garand Thumb. I'm not sure if you're purposely being obtuse or you've never seen a cop/law show before because this is pretty basic stuff.Yeah you didn't have to have knowledge of firearms to prosecute.
Yeah you didn't have to have knowledge of firearms to prosecute.
That would be stuff you would consult an expert witness about.Ok, to clarify what I mean when I say that she would at least be somewhat knowledgeable of firearms is "your Honor, the accused killed Mrs. Smith with this 1911 .45 caliber pistol found at the scene of the crime with the bullets found in Mrs. Smith's head matching pistol with the accused fingerprints all over it." I'm not saying that she would rival the likes of Jerry Miculek or Garand Thumb. I'm not sure if you're purposely being obtuse or you've never seen a cop/law show before because this is pretty basic stuff.
That would be stuff you would consult an expert witness about.
DerpExpert on what ?
Derp
Ok, even if we were to go that route, don't you think that after consulting so many times, you'd at least pick up on some terminology? I don't even know why you're so adamant about it.That would be stuff you would consult an expert witness about.
I tried Glocks when I was shopping, years ago. "Highly recommended" by many I knew.
Didnt fit my hand tho, so I went with SW M&P. I cannot believe the Glocks dont have a chamber load indicator. How do you tell if you have one in the chamber? That seems like BS to me, I wouldnt buy that. And what's a "magazine disconnect mechanism?" If that isnt something you press to drop the magazine, what is it?
![]()
![]()
![]()
So we agree she doesn't own a Glock.![]()
Nope. Gun owners know where she stands.Does it even matter ?
Nope. Gun owners know where she stands.
No. They know where she stands. Its one factor to consider in voting. I think she would confiscate firearms in a heart beat but still not voting for Trump.No, they know where their bias lies.
No. They know where she stands. Its one factor to consider in voting. I think she would confiscate firearms in a heart beat but still not voting for Trump.
Yes, that is definitely your opinion.No, they think they know. But in reality, all they have is their bias.
Yes, that is definitely your opinion.
What she said:Versus your that you know where Kamala stands ?
As President, she won’t stop fighting so that Americans have the freedom to live safe from gun violence in our schools, communities, and places of worship. She’ll ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, require universal background checks,