There is no need for professional analysis because most of know she didn't say "kill a cop", she said "killer cop."Frim his yob man. :doh
You have no point.
Hopefully this firing leads to a professional analyses.
And you would be wrong again, as she clearly did.There is no need for professional analysis because most of know she didn't say "kill a cop", she said "killer cop."
It doesn't really matter. The same types were chanting for "Dead Cops" in an earlier parade, and in Ferguson, so it's not like they are driven snow.And you would be wrong again, as she clearly did.
Had she not said both, the chanters would not have replied with both.
First- the chant is "kill a cop"
Second- the two officers gunned down by a spineless worm were Asian and Hispanic
Third - so one conclude the blacks chanting "kill a cop' will kill black cops as well as all other races. Damn! I wish I could get their resumes to see how far in school they went and what types of careers they have.
Wrong. She said both.Wrong, the chant is "killer cops" which was led by a black woman whose brother was killed by cops in Baltimore. She is seeking justice for the cop who killed her brother, not to kill them. The chant was “We won’t stop/we can’t stop/’til killer cops/are in cell blocks.”
It doesn't really matter. The same types were chanting for "Dead Cops" in an earlier parade, and in Ferguson, so it's not like they are driven snow.
They certainly try to make a big deal of their innocence this time around.
:dohI am not wrong by your admission that she said both.
"Those people," eh?
You can't quote properly even when there are just three words involved! Remarkable!
Scare quotes or shudder quotes are quotation marks placed around a word or phrase to imply that it may not signify its apparent meaning or that it is not necessarily the way the quoting person would express its concept. The quotes serve a function similar to verbally prefixing a phrase with "so-called". When referred to as "scare quotes", the quotation marks are suggested to imply skepticism of or disagreement with the quoted terminology.
You being purposely obtuse now. I guess that's what we get after 10+ pages you trying to tell people that this woman said something even the OP admitted didn't make any sense as he described it. However, since I'm feeling generous, I'll let you read up. They're regularly used in the English language.
Scare quotes - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Tell us again about how you've mastered the English language.
So you divined that Kobie was using "scare quotes", huh? Did he send you a message to that effect?
"...In a series of studies in 2005 and 2006, researchers at the University of Michigan found that when misinformed people, particularly political partisans, were exposed to corrected facts in news stories, they rarely changed their minds. In fact, they often became even more strongly set in their beliefs. Facts, they found, were not curing misinformation. Like an underpowered antibiotic, facts could actually make misinformation even stronger..." - See more at: How facts backfire - The Boston Globe
http://www.dartmouth.edu/~nyhan/nyhan-reifler.pdf
:naughty
Me though? I have been honest about what was said. She said both. Which is confirmed by what was repeated.
Do you really not understand that? The chanters would not have repeated it had she not said it.
And the station matters not to what she actually said.
They have had it analyzed.
Frim his yob man. :doh
You have no point.
Hopefully this firing leads to a professional analyses.
And you would be wrong again, as she clearly did.
Had she not said both, the chanters would not have replied with both.
Wrong. She said both.
:doh
Yes, you are wrong.
???
Why on earth would I do that?
Given that I clearly wasn't directly quoting you, what the **** did you think I was doing?
Now how would anyone know that???
Know your limits.Passing familiarity with fairly common rhetorical devices?
Know your limits.
:doh
:doh
I see you understand why your argument fails.
This isn't about me, or did you not know that?So smug, so wrong...so we're laughing at you
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?