Simple question, are you okay with the GOP overturning the election and crowning Trump president?

[Aunt Antifa]

Or repeated drivel spewed by the minions of the oligarch party and distributed by the "media" and "corporations".

Incorrect! Typed it all out myself.

You don’t get how positing on a forum works.

 

[cabse5]

He did. And then the potus called him yesterday and demand the SoS break the law.

That is literally part of the attorney general's job to make sure election law is observed and the Georgia Attorney General didn't make sure election law was observed...Trump is literally telling the Attorney General of Georgia to do his job.

 

[Aunt Antifa]

That is literally part of the attorney general's job to make sure election law is observed and the Georgia Attorney General didn't make sure election law was observed...Trump is literally telling the Attorney General of Georgia to do his job.

Trump literally told him to find 11800 votes for him so he can win Ga.

 

[cabse5]

No try again. No political bias was found and the investigation was opened correctly.

Yes, an investigation was initiated into the Trump campaign based on hearsay evidence.

It amazes me how some of you dudes just don't get the hypocrisy of your actions...You claim an investigation into the 2020 presidential election can't be commenced due to lack of evidence but you wholeheartedly endorsed an investigation into the Trump campaign after the 2016 election based on hearsay evidence. I don't get it. Are you claiming hearsay evidence is evidence?

 

[cabse5]

Trump literally told him to find 11800 votes for him so he can win Ga.

Trump literally told him to do his job and part of his job is to prosecute election fraud.

 

[Aunt Antifa]

Trump literally told him to do his job. Part of which is to prosecute election fraud.

His job is not to create votes for the loser of the election.

 

[cabse5]

His job is not to create votes for the loser of the election.

Why are you taking one sentence of their conversation so way out of proportion?...I'd like to hear the entire taped conversation.

 

[Aunt Antifa]

Why are you taking one sentence of their conversation so way out of proportion?...I'd like to hear the entire taped conversation.

WHy are you defending something you just stated you haven’t heard? You just admitted any defenses you’ve made are completely made up.

So disingenious.

 

[cabse5]

Not true again. Read the OIG report it specifically stated the Dossier was not used to initiate the investigation. Over and over you Trumpers lie. It is old and tired.

Since many have stipulated the investigation into the 2020 presidential election isn't warranted due to lack of evidence, I'd think these same folks would be consistent and also say an investigation into the Trump campaign wasn't warranted due to lack of evidence.

 

[cabse5]

WHy are you defending something you just stated you haven’t heard? You just admitted any defenses you’ve made are completely made up.

So disingenious.

I've made up nothing...Speaking of making things up, prove that Trump is asking the Attorney General to throw the Georgia election results.

 

[Maximus Zeebra]

That is literally part of the attorney general's job to make sure election law is observed and the Georgia Attorney General didn't make sure election law was observed...Trump is literally telling the Attorney General of Georgia to do his job.

Anything can be misrepresented and lied about in the propaganda apparatus. They are pretty much free to say whatever they want, or what they are told to say.

So, what mass media says is completely irrelevant. You might as well listen to a sunglasses and watch salesman on the street.

 

[Quag]

It is well documented that Mexico has paid for portions of the wall and Mexico has also provided troops to bolster border security with the southern border of Mexico. If Trump lied, how did Trump lie about Mexico paying for the wall? Hum?

Provide the exact quote where I said that?

 

[Aunt Antifa]

I've made up nothing...Speaking of making things up, prove that Trump is asking the Attorney General to throw the Georgia election results.

Listen to the tape. He directly asks him several times.

 

[cabse5]

Provide the exact quote where I said that?

Your proclamation that Trump lied about the wall is solely based on Trump saying Mexico would solely pay for the wall...Not that Mexico would pay a portion of the wall or that Mexico would (along with others) pay for the wall but that Mexico would solely pay for the wall...Prove that Trump said Mexico would solely pay for the wall. If you can't prove that Trump said Mexico would solely pay for the wall (and you can't prove that), your argument falls apart and in all trustworthiness you should recant.

 

[cabse5]

Listen to the tape. He directly asks him several times.

Ask yourself what else could Trump possibly be doing...Do ya suppose Trump might be hoping to convince the attorney general to investigate the Georgia presidential election results due to possible voter fraud?...Duh?

 

[cabse5]

WHy are you defending something you just stated you haven’t heard? You just admitted any defenses you’ve made are completely made up.

So disingenious.

So, the only explanation is that Trump is asking the attorney general to throw the Georgia election to Trump?

 

[cabse5]

The dossier was not used to start any investigation but it was in fact amazingly accurate and its basic premise that Putin was helping Trump to win and he was welcoming the help was proven by both Mueller and the bipartisan Senate report. You need to read them.

I don't put credence in fairy tales.

 

[cabse5]

Again, and for the last time, I don't know what evidence Barr used to make his assessment but he stated without reservation that the investigation had proper predicate. I'll take his version vs. yours. And shouting doesn't make your point any more credible.

And Barr acknowledges that proper predicate to investigate the Trump campaign was hearsay evidence...

Barr is actually stating an investigation (like the investigation into the 2020 presidential election, for example) can be commenced based on hearsay evidence because hearsay evidence instigated the investigation into the Trump campaign, er, Barr said hearsay evidence was a proper predicate to begin an investigation into the Trump campaign. Figure it out, just once.

 

[Aunt Antifa]

So, the only explanation is that Trump is asking the attorney general to throw the Georgia election to Trump?

No, he was asking the GA SoS to throw the Ga election to him.

See? YOu didn’t listen to the tape, you don’t even know who was talking to who.

 

[Quag]

Your proclamation that Trump lied about the wall is solely based on Trump saying Mexico would solely pay for the wall...Not that Mexico would pay a portion of the wall or that Mexico would (along with others) pay for the wall but that Mexico would solely pay for the wall...Prove that Trump said Mexico would solely pay for the wall. If you can't prove that Trump said Mexico would solely pay for the wall (and you can't prove that), your argument falls apart and in all trustworthiness you should recant.

Lol grasping at straws
Already proven that Trump lied over and over again on this

 

[cabse5]

You keep saying "hearsay" and Barr's story is still the same, proper predicate. He's right, you're not.

Barr is saying hearsay evidence is proper predicate to begin an investigation. Come on, I'm getting tired of typing this same obviousness to you.

 

[cabse5]

No, he was asking the GA SoS to throw the Ga election to him.

See? YOu didn’t listen to the tape, you don’t even know who was talking to who.

No. Trump was hoping to convince the Georgia Attorney General to investigate the voting of the 2020 presidential election in Georgia.

 

[Slartibartfast]

No. Trump was hoping to convince the Georgia Attorney General to investigate the voting of the 2020 presidential election in Georgia.

For any such investigation to be valid, there should be no target results in terms of which candidate gets how many votes, only targets in terms of conformance to the defined processes. By naming a target, Trump removes the notion that this is an investigation and instead is asking for a mob style fix.

 

[Fledermaus]

It is pretty simple question. Biden won both the popular vote and the Electoral College vote and there has been no proof of fraud or rigging as the court cases, and even Barr have pointed out. With all of that, if the GOP was able to overturn the election and make Trump president, would that have your approval?

No.

 

[cabse5]

Trump literally told him to find 11800 votes for him so he can win Ga.

Trump literally did not ask the Georgia Attorney General to throw the Georgia election to Trump. Instead, Trump was trying to convince the attorney general to investigate the voting results of the Georgia presidential election.