• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Should The USA Accept the Truce?

Should The USA Accept The Truce?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 9 17.0%

  • No!

    Votes: 44 83.0%
  • Total voters
    53
Originally Posted by Trajan Octavian Titus
That wasn't the truth that was some Noam Chomskyish pro-Communist horseshit, next you'll be telling me that Pol Pot, North Vietnam, and North Korea were just misunderstood.
Click to expand...
No, I will not be telling you that.
 
Billo_Really said:
Simon already debunked this. The report does not say that they were, without a doubt, al Qaeda camps. Your grasping at whatever straw you can find because your argueing a losing battle. Try again, maybe your luck will change.
Click to expand...

Simon didn't debunk jackshit. All he did was twist the issue from Saddam supporting terrorism to the U.S. supporting a pro-Democracy revolutionary force opposed to the current Iranian regime which had nothing to do with the fact that Saddam was infact training Islamic Radicals at Salmon Pak.
 
Originally Posted by Trajan Octavian Titus
Simon didn't debunk jackshit. All he did was twist the issue from Saddam supporting terrorism to the U.S. supporting a pro-Democracy revolutionary force opposed to the current Iranian regime which had nothing to do with the fact that Saddam was infact training Islamic Radicals at Salmon Pak.
Click to expand...
Wow, it can read. Now, lets work on your comprehension.
 
Originally Posted by Trajan Octavian Titus
Well your support for the Sandinista regime is definately on par with supporting Pol Pot, North Vietnam, or North Korea, they were just as bad as all three of those.
Click to expand...
I do not support the Sandinista government. I used them as an example of wrongful US intervention in another country's politics.

I would be more for this war in Iraq if I could see that the good outweighed the bad. But I am not seeing that. I would love for someone to change my mind. But I need proof, not bombastial rhetoric.
 
Billo_Really said:
I do not support the Sandinista government. I used them as an example of wrongful US intervention in another country's politics.

I would be more for this war in Iraq if I could see that the good outweighed the bad. But I am not seeing that. I would love for someone to change my mind. But I need proof, not bombastial rhetoric.
Click to expand...

How is supporting a pro-Democratic revolutionary force opposed to a tyrannical totalitarian communist dictarship wrongful U.S. intervention? I view it as an example of U.S. support for Democracy... that's a good thing.
 
Originally Posted by Trajan Octavian Titus
How is supporting a pro-Democratic revolutionary force opposed to a tyrannical totalitarian communist dictarship wrongful U.S. intervention? I view it as an example of U.S. support for Democracy... that's a good thing.
Click to expand...
This ones a coin toss. I don't want to argue it.
 
Originally Posted by Trajan Octavian Titus
It's not a coin toss.

Sandanista = Bad

Contras = Good

It's as simple as that.
Click to expand...
So you believe in death squads and the killing of missionaries?
 
Billo_Really said:
So you believe in death squads and the killing of missionaries?
Click to expand...

Communist propoganda, it was the Sandanistas who killed civilians populations in retribution for collaboration with the contras, where did you hear that the Contras were killing missionaries?
 
Originally Posted by Trajan Octavian Titus
Communist propoganda, it was the Sandanistas who killed civilians populations in retribution for collaboration with the contras, where did you hear that the Contras were killing missionaries?
Click to expand...
The priest in El Salvador was killed by contra death squads.
 
Trajan, why can't you ever just acknowledge that some of the people the US government has supported some unsavory characters? Acknowledging this fact doesn't imply that we shouldn't have done so, or that the opposition was any better. But you're just making excuses for murderers. I can't figure out why.

Once again this thread has gone way off track...
 
Originally Posted by Trajan Octavian Titus
I'm not buying it who reported this the Sandanistas press?
Click to expand...
A Nobel Prize winner.

I think we should at least talk about a truce.
 
Kandahar said:
Trajan, why can't you ever just acknowledge that some of the people the US government has supported some unsavory characters? Acknowledging this fact doesn't imply that we shouldn't have done so, or that the opposition was any better. But you're just making excuses for murderers. I can't figure out why.

Once again this thread has gone way off track...
Click to expand...

Because the Contras weren't bad, they were freedom fighters.
 
Billo_Really said:
A Nobel Prize winner.

I think we should at least talk about a truce.
Click to expand...

Yasser Arafat won a nobel peace prize too, it's not a really that much of an accomplishment any more especially considering the fact that the prizes name sake is the inventor of dynamite, talk about your oxymorons.

Also which nobel prize winner? I want names he can still be a commie piece of sh!t.
 
Originally Posted by Trajan Octavian Titus
Because the Contras weren't bad, they were freedom fighters.
Click to expand...
If crime-fighters fight crime and fire-fighters fight fire, what do freedom-fighters fight?
 
Originally Posted by Trajan Octavian Titus
Yasser Arafat won a nobel peace prize too, it's not a really that much of an accomplishment any more especially considering the fact that the prizes name sake is the inventor of dynamite, talk about your oxymorons.

Also which nobel prize winner? I want names he can still be a commie piece of sh!t.
Click to expand...
Dynamite was invented by the other Nobel.
 
Billo_Really said:
I think we should at least talk about a truce.
Click to expand...

I'm guessing someone needs a little education about the Koran.

Put it like this Billo, it's very similar to the Communist Manifesto.

Ends justifies the means mean anything to you?

You know bro, I know you love to play devils advocate and all, but, now look me straight in the friggin eye and tell me we should talk truce.

Let's do this.

Truce: Billo vs. teacher. I'll smoke your dumb ass on this. I can't friggin believe you said that. Dude, what the fuc*k? You're debating TOT and got all cockey? What? Time to die.
 
Originally posted by teacher:
What?..........
Click to expand...
There were two Nobel's. One invented dynamite, the other was for peace.
 
Billo_Really said:
There were two Nobel's. One invented dynamite, the other was for peace.
Click to expand...

It was the same guy. Alfred Nobel.

Alfred Nobel
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search

Alfred NobelAlfred Bernhard Nobel ▶ (help·info) (October 21, 1833, Stockholm, Sweden – December 10, 1896, San Remo, Italy) was a Swedish chemist, engineer armaments manufacturer and the inventor of dynamite. He owned Bofors, a major armaments majufacturer, that he had redirected from its previous role as an iron and steel mill. In his last will, he used his enormous fortune to institute the Nobel Prizes. The synthetic element Nobelium was named after him.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Nobel

Now you know and knowing is half the battle.
 
Billo_Really said:
There were two Nobel's. One invented dynamite, the other was for peace.
Click to expand...

You should know by now. Run the fuc*k away or say you are sorry. You catch me wrong...how often? Of course I would have never posted links like Trajan (7) there did. I'd just say you suck dumbass. Next? It's good to be King. Don't fight this one no more bro. Trust me, have I ever lied to you? It's done.

Little something TOT is not telling you. Al felt so bad about inventing something so destructive that he at the end of his life tried to make amends. The Nobel Peace prize dumb ass. No, I didn't just look that up. I know stuff Billo. Go watch some TV, or go to the library, spend the rest of your life doing that and then we'll talk. Is this what you do up here when I'm not keeping an eye on you?

Hey TOT. Ask me where ol' AL got the Potassium Nitrate from. Yes, you can go research. Get back to me.

Some one just needs to keep my ass in the friggin basement. Up here I spout facts. Down there I make shi*t up.
 
Originally posted by teacher:
You should know by now. Run the fuc*k away or say you are sorry. You catch me wrong...how often? Of course I would have never posted links like Trajan (7) there did. I'd just say you suck dumbass. Next? It's good to be King. Don't fight this one no more bro. Trust me, have I ever lied to you? It's done.

Little something TOT is not telling you. Al felt so bad about inventing something so destructive that he at the end of his life tried to make amends. The Nobel Peace prize dumb ass. No, I didn't just look that up. I know stuff Billo. Go watch some TV, or go to the library, spend the rest of your life doing that and then we'll talk. Is this what you do up here when I'm not keeping an eye on you?

Hey TOT. Ask me where ol' AL got the Potassium Nitrate from. Yes, you can go research. Get back to me.

Some one just needs to keep my ass in the friggin basement. Up here I spout facts. Down there I make shi*t up.
Click to expand...
Are you saying the History Channel lied to me?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom