Ladies and gentlemen, a dictionary isn't going to settle a debate about abortion.
There are different definitions of the word for a reason. All do not apply at any given time. If you use the definition 'offspring' or 'fetus' for the word 'child', then a child would not necessarily be a person.
If you use the definition 'birth to puberty' then a child would most likely be a person.
Just depends on which definition you are using.
As posted eariler, Rivrrat.
The legal definition of the word "person" is simply "a human being."
Certainly not, if we can't at least agree about what it says or how to apply the definitions contained there-in, it isn't.
And that definition is sorely outdated and hotly debated. Not to mention insulting and limiting.
What do you want me to say?
I'm glad the definition is inclusive to the extent that it even includes the youngest members of our species.
Equal rights and all that jazz.
And when there are multiple definitions, it's impossible.
For instance, using one of the definitions of the word 'child', (son, daughter, offspring) my cat is a child. And you want to claim that all children are persons.
Oh Good grief;
![]()
You're the one taking one definition and applying it across the board. Now you 'good grief' me when I do the same? How's that work?
Now, are all children persons? Or does it depend on the definition you're using after all?
I got nothing again.
That's why it's so entirely silly to sit here quoting dictionary definitions.
Overturning Roe would make the 'practice' of elective abortions illegal. No more abortion clinics. No more "elective" abortions without consequences.
How would overturning Roe v. Wade get rid of all abortion clinics? All it would mean is abortion would be legal in some states and not in others.
okay Riverrat; how do you define a person?![]()
So basically you are saying "Fetuses are not children, it is silly to use a dictionary to see what defines child" ?
Uh, no. Fetuses ARE children according the definition of child that reads "offspring".
Or the one that reads "fetus". Then again, using that definition.. every animal on the planet is a child too.
Therefore, not all children are people. And round and round we go.
Nope.Are you trying to suggest that just because a child is in the womb that it is somehow a different species than its parent?
Indeed.I imagine that every animal is the offspring of its parents that gave birth to it.
The children of humans are human, but not necessarily persons. At a certain point they may become persons, given the right circumstances.Just the children of people are people.The offspring/child of a cat is still a cat and the offspring/child of a dog is still a dog and so on.
Nope.
Indeed.
The children of humans are human, but not necessarily persons. At a certain point they may become persons, given the right circumstances.
So you're a child before you're a person?
Is someone keeping track of all this? I don't want to miss anything important. This is getting more confusing than Lost.
I knew there was some reason kids don't have civil rights. :doh
All men are created equal. But that means all persons. Except for children who aren't persons yet. And cats.