Should males be banned from holding political and judicial offices worldwide ?

[X Factor]

Only woman should be allowed the vote. Only male eunuchs can serve in government.

Way to make sure Biden stays in office.

 

[Bullseye]

Males are a highly aggressive folk compared to women.

They also make incredibly stupid decisions politically and judicially, while women make far better, calmer and more progressive politics for the common good of society.

Yet there are few countries where women are leaders (no female US President yet, no elected female Austrian Chancellor yet - only an appointed one).

Therefore, should men be banned from politics and judiciary ? Or at least should they be limited to 49% representation max. in parliament or Congress ? And should it be mandated that if there’s a male President, there has to be a female successor afterwards ? Globally ?

YES.

I'm not sure what the women politicians are like where you're at, but here they are every bit as corrupt, incompetent and dumb-as-posts as our male politicians.

 

[lurchadams]

Well it is interesting that those men who want women to rule them tend to be far left. sort of supports what I am saying

I don't understand why you're taking this thread so seriously. The OP is nutty, but you're kinda going "nutty" the other way. Women can be just as aggressive as men - I've worked with some female salespeople who were sharks (which I admire).

We want the most QUALIFIED person, man or woman and lifetime terms should go away.

 

[X Factor]

Nobody should be precluded from anything based on gender.

 

[Common Sense 1]

That sound is a big flush coming.

 

[HIP56948]

We could try it for 50 years and see if the world is actually a better place to live.

 

[TheParser]

They also make incredibly stupid decisions politically and judicially, while women make far better, calmer and more progressive politics for the common good of society.

Oh, absolutely!

This country and world should be ruled by ladies such as Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Walters, AOC, Hillary Clinton, and others of that ilk.

Then we could all live in a Utopia.

 

[SMTA]

Males are a highly aggressive folk compared to women.

They also make incredibly stupid decisions politically and judicially, while women make far better, calmer and more progressive politics for the common good of society.

Yet there are few countries where women are leaders (no female US President yet, no elected female Austrian Chancellor yet - only an appointed one).

Therefore, should men be banned from politics and judiciary ? Or at least should they be limited to 49% representation max. in parliament or Congress ? And should it be mandated that if there’s a male President, there has to be a female successor afterwards ? Globally ?

YES.

What an ignorant and unrealistic post.

 

[Bum]

Males are a highly aggressive folk compared to women.

They also make incredibly stupid decisions politically and judicially, while women make far better, calmer and more progressive politics for the common good of society.

Yet there are few countries where women are leaders (no female US President yet, no elected female Austrian Chancellor yet - only an appointed one).

Therefore, should men be banned from politics and judiciary ? Or at least should they be limited to 49% representation max. in parliament or Congress ? And should it be mandated that if there’s a male President, there has to be a female successor afterwards ? Globally ?

YES.

 

[DiAnna]

Where is the "Dumbest Poll In DP History" option?

 

[SMTA]

Where is the "Dumbest Poll In DP History" option?

Ask, and ye shall receive!

 

[jpevans]

Males are a highly aggressive folk compared to women.

They also make incredibly stupid decisions politically and judicially, while women make far better, calmer and more progressive politics for the common good of society.

Yet there are few countries where women are leaders (no female US President yet, no elected female Austrian Chancellor yet - only an appointed one).

Therefore, should men be banned from politics and judiciary ? Or at least should they be limited to 49% representation max. in parliament or Congress ? And should it be mandated that if there’s a male President, there has to be a female successor afterwards ? Globally ?

YES.

Other.
All Americans should be encouraged to participate in politics. What is needed is a smarter electorate. Don't just vote, study the candidates,1st. Ads ain't research.

 

[jpevans]

its a stupid poll because it demonstrates a unrealistic view of society. Men and women are different but assuming one group is better than the other is stupid. And the flaws of each group would mean equal problems-though for different reasons than if the current structure was eliminated

Sounds like a vote for the ERA.

 

[The Mark]

Males are a highly aggressive folk compared to women.

They also make incredibly stupid decisions politically and judicially, while women make far better, calmer and more progressive politics for the common good of society.

Yet there are few countries where women are leaders (no female US President yet, no elected female Austrian Chancellor yet - only an appointed one).

Therefore, should men be banned from politics and judiciary ? Or at least should they be limited to 49% representation max. in parliament or Congress ? And should it be mandated that if there’s a male President, there has to be a female successor afterwards ? Globally ?

YES.

You forgot option 5: It's not this simple, please explain.

Sure, having more women in government, ideally an amount that matches the overall population numbers fairly closely, would be nice.

But making it a requirement isn't the way to go, when you're talking elected officials. For that you need to change society.

Gonna take awhile and alot of work.

 

[Risky Thicket]

Males are a highly aggressive folk compared to women.

They also make incredibly stupid decisions politically and judicially, while women make far better, calmer and more progressive politics for the common good of society.

Yet there are few countries where women are leaders (no female US President yet, no elected female Austrian Chancellor yet - only an appointed one).

Therefore, should men be banned from politics and judiciary ? Or at least should they be limited to 49% representation max. in parliament or Congress ? And should it be mandated that if there’s a male President, there has to be a female successor afterwards ? Globally ?

YES.

Will Yale males be permitted to vote along with women? They’re very similar.

 

[screenwriter]

WRONG! Apparently women cannot convince even women voters they are better.

Some of us don't vote with our vaginas - and anyone who thinks I should has no place in office.

 

[Old 'N Chill]

Nobody should be precluded from anything based on gender.

Agree!

 

[TurtleDude]

Nobody should be precluded from anything based on gender.

well maybe a sperm donor?

 

[TurtleDude]

Sounds like a vote for the ERA.

if the ERA was passed would there be a draft for women and only open college sports teams?

 

[Cardinal]

Males are a highly aggressive folk compared to women.

They also make incredibly stupid decisions politically and judicially, while women make far better, calmer and more progressive politics for the common good of society.

Yet there are few countries where women are leaders (no female US President yet, no elected female Austrian Chancellor yet - only an appointed one).

Therefore, should men be banned from politics and judiciary ? Or at least should they be limited to 49% representation max. in parliament or Congress ? And should it be mandated that if there’s a male President, there has to be a female successor afterwards ? Globally ?

YES.

Marjorie Taylor Greene.

 

[trixare4kids]

Males are a highly aggressive folk compared to women.

They also make incredibly stupid decisions politically and judicially, while women make far better, calmer and more progressive politics for the common good of society.

Yet there are few countries where women are leaders (no female US President yet, no elected female Austrian Chancellor yet - only an appointed one).

Therefore, should men be banned from politics and judiciary ? Or at least should they be limited to 49% representation max. in parliament or Congress ? And should it be mandated that if there’s a male President, there has to be a female successor afterwards ? Globally ?

YES.

The best qualified person should get the job.

This is 2021. Women have already broken the glass ceiling. Keep up.

 

[Lovebug]

Males are a highly aggressive folk compared to women.

They also make incredibly stupid decisions politically and judicially, while women make far better, calmer and more progressive politics for the common good of society.

Yet there are few countries where women are leaders (no female US President yet, no elected female Austrian Chancellor yet - only an appointed one).

Therefore, should men be banned from politics and judiciary ? Or at least should they be limited to 49% representation max. in parliament or Congress ? And should it be mandated that if there’s a male President, there has to be a female successor afterwards ? Globally ?

YES.

It all depends on the particular male or female, their temper, their qualifications. Voting, or banning from power, anyone based on what is in their pants is absurd and not even acceptable in our gender neutral society.
Now, banning vs right to vote for a suitable candidate is another topic altogether.

 

[Ginger Ale]

Hm, I don't know about that after watching Green spout off but I do think party politics is passe. I think we should just vote for who we want, and ditch the two party bullsheet.

 

[Felis Leo]

Males are a highly aggressive folk compared to women.

They also make incredibly stupid decisions politically and judicially, while women make far better, calmer and more progressive politics for the common good of society.

Yet there are few countries where women are leaders (no female US President yet, no elected female Austrian Chancellor yet - only an appointed one).

Therefore, should men be banned from politics and judiciary ? Or at least should they be limited to 49% representation max. in parliament or Congress ? And should it be mandated that if there’s a male President, there has to be a female successor afterwards ? Globally ?

YES.

No. But by all means, never vote for a male politician again.

 

[BahamaBob]

Males are a highly aggressive folk compared to women.

They also make incredibly stupid decisions politically and judicially, while women make far better, calmer and more progressive politics for the common good of society.

Yet there are few countries where women are leaders (no female US President yet, no elected female Austrian Chancellor yet - only an appointed one).

Therefore, should men be banned from politics and judiciary ? Or at least should they be limited to 49% representation max. in parliament or Congress ? And should it be mandated that if there’s a male President, there has to be a female successor afterwards ? Globally ?

YES.

You must feel all males are like you.