• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should Kamala Wait Until After the Election to Reveal Policy Agenda?

Should Kamala Wait Unitl After the Electon to Reveal Her Policy Agenda?


  • Total voters
    33

MrNiceGuy

Symbiotic Pnemonic
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 2, 2022
Messages
17,427
Reaction score
7,500
Location
The Twilight Zone
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
Nope. Positive vibes are one thing, but at some point she will need an agenda to pitch and defend at a debate. I mean, Trump's just produced an all caps slogan agenda, so he's not big on the details either, but that's no excuse to follow suit.
 
I'll probably watch clips of her speech. Michelle Obama's was pretty good. The fact that Harris has never attempted a self coup seems like a positive thing.
 
Congressional Democrats want Kamala Harris to wait until after the election to give her policy agenda.

Congressional Democrats are largely content to wait until after the election for Kamala Harris to drill down on her policy agenda. https://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/16/harris-dnc-democrats-message-policies-00174195

She released a very substantive economic platform last week.
 
Well, the first three posts in response set a decisive tone as to how this thread ages.
 
She released a very substantive economic platform last week.

Yep, but demanding (aka hoping) that others come up with a solution (a policy with details and an enforcement mechanism?) within the first 3.5 months of her administration is just a tad on the weak side. ;)
 
Congressional Democrats want Kamala Harris to wait until after the election to give her policy agenda.

Congressional Democrats are largely content to wait until after the election for Kamala Harris to drill down on her policy agenda. https://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/16/harris-dnc-democrats-message-policies-00174195

Since you’ll blame the next 76 days on Harris for whatever happens, she’s actually working with Biden and was on the phone with Bibi today.
 
Stupid poll.

I can't speak for ANYONE ELSE, but I am voting for Harris because of one thing: She is not Trump. The dems could run a three-toed sloth and my answer would be the same.

We know Trump's agenda. It's called Project 2025. Trump lies when he says it's not.
 
No, unless her handlers think that’s best. ;)
I think it's entirely dependent on how the polling looks. Dems can't pull off another nominee switch and Dems want to win.

So, if her polling builds enough (and then holds) for them to think her chances of winning are good, they'll do nothing new and refrain from rolling out policy or letting her talk on her own, beyond a VERY FEW of the most Harris friendly venues possible.

But, if that's not the case, they'll start to try to change or fix what they think is not working. Like, maybe they'll roll out policy or even risk having her speak on her own. So, plan B or C or whatever they feel they must do to try to help her polling.

Only giving more of anything if and when necessary.
 
Stupid poll.

I can't speak for ANYONE ELSE, but I am voting for Harris because of one thing: She is not Trump. The dems could run a three-toed sloth and my answer would be the same.

We know Trump's agenda. It's called Project 2025. Trump lies when he says it's not.
Kenan Thompson pulled out the huge Project 2025 book on the DNC floor and read out the good parts.
 
Kamala’s policies have been on display since she was in congress. If you don’t know what they are you just don’t want to.
I think you're right and I heard today that the GOP plans to potentially put out a Harris policy doc, based on her own words and what she most recently said about a slew of topics. It will annoy her but if it's fair and it's her own words/statements, she won't have much to complain about. But she can certainly try to change/update anything included in it by doing the obviously unthinkable and using "her words" to dispute "her words".
 
I think you're right and I heard today that the GOP plans to potentially put out a Harris policy doc, based on her own words and what she most recently said about a slew of topics. It will annoy her but if it's fair and it's her own words/statements, she won't have much to complain about. But she can certainly try to change/update anything included in it by doing the obviously unthinkable and using "her words" to dispute "her words".
We don't care.
 
I think it's entirely dependent on how the polling looks. Dems can't pull off another nominee switch and Dems want to win.

So, if her polling builds enough (and then holds) for them to think her chances of winning are good, they'll do nothing new and refrain from rolling out policy or letting her talk on her own, beyond a VERY FEW of the most Harris friendly venues possible.

But, if that's not the case, they'll start to try to change or fix what they think is not working. Like, maybe they'll roll out policy or even risk having her speak on her own. So, plan B or C or whatever they feel they must do to try to help her polling.

Only giving more of anything if and when necessary.
I think Trump should debate Walz. Trump is not a gentleman and not fit to debate a woman.
 
"Kamala's not talking about policy lmao"

Screenshot_20240821_213242_Chrome.webp

Meanwhile the Orange one is openly bragging about refusing to talk about policy in lieu of personal attacks and threatenimg advisors who ask him to stick to policy.
 
We don't care.
Republicans have lost all credibility.

Trump never seems to be held responsible for crap like this:

Trump falsely claims Harris campaign used AI to fake crowd in Detroit​


How terrified do you have to be to lie about a campaign crowd? This is the republican candidate for president in a nutshell: a lying, insecure, malignant narcissist.
 
Back
Top Bottom