Well, generally because it is almost the same as what we see in the parents. And it is a bit more different than what we would find in the grand parents. And more different yet than what we find in the great-grandparents. In fact, for every generation we are removed from the other DNA source, there is a little bit more difference in the DNA, a difference that is quite constant and predictable under environmental stability.
That, of course, also means that if a species is closely related to us, its DNA will be more similar to ours than if the species is evolutionary MORE removed from us.
And THAT proves that we are closely related with apes, much more than, f.ex. the pig.
Thanks for disproving your own earlier lie.
Well, unfortunately for you, I just did look it up. And your lie is disproved
But it is not surprising that we see creationists spew a lie and then insist that others check the accuracy of the lie. It is a common, very dishonest tactic by creationist liars, of which you clearly are showing to be one by now.
The claim is yours, so YOU are the one who need to prove it. Not that I should expect you to be so honest an un-hypocritical as to actually do so; backing up your claims with evidence.
But then, you really can't, as there is no evidence for your claims. After all, they are all false.
You seem to not have done so, or you wouldn't be so ignorant of even basic science or basic biology.
That is, unless you now deliberately are lying about this science.
What an unfortunate dichotomy. Either you are incredibly ignorant, or you are incredibly ignorant.
(Or worse yet, you are both!)
