Should Donald Trump go to prison for what he did on the 6th of January 2021?

[Rumpelstil]

Let us all hope so!

 

[switt]

Ok, so he like tried to overthrow our government - I gotcha. In order for anyone (except those afflicted with persistent TDS) to believe our claim that he was like trying to overthrow our government, we're gonna need to provide some like proof of this. Can you fill me in on what it is so I can back up this claim that he tried to like overthrow our government? That would be like helpful.

Understand that if Donny and his gang are able to again obstruct justice, our democracy will be ending. You may love owning the libs today, but when things go bad, we will be unable to change it. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. With slo jo, if things go really bad we can just vote him out. Not so with the insurrection croud.

 

[neil]

Understand that if Donny and his gang are able to again obstruct justice, our democracy will be ending. You may love owning the libs today, but when things go bad, we will be unable to change it. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. With slo jo, if things go really bad we can just vote him out. Not so with the insurrection croud.

What do you mean again obstruct justice?

To me, Trump is like a wartime consigliere, a political consigliere; it's what we need in a time of political war. He's not what I really want at the helm of our government, at least in the long run; I actually want a Ron Paul or Justin Amash, but I think they may only be reserved when we have achieved political peace. I also like Thomas Massie & he may be a wildcard in this context, or perhaps someone who comes between the two camps (Trump vs Paul/Amash).

 

[bongsaway]

???

Why should anyone go to prison for taking part in a peaceful rally?

They shouldn't. It was the part after the peaceful rally. You remember don't ya when they went to the capitol beat the shit out of cops and tore up the capitol chanting hang mike pence? That's why he should go to jail, he instigated it all.

 

[bongsaway]

What do you mean again obstruct justice?

To me, Trump is like a wartime consigliere, a political consigliere; it's what we need in a time of political war. He's not what I really want at the helm of our government, at least in the long run; I actually want a Ron Paul or Justin Amash, but I think they may only be reserved when we have achieved political peace. I also like Thomas Massie & he may be a wildcard in this context, or perhaps someone who comes between the two camps (Trump vs Paul/Amash).

America isn't in a political war, the republicans are. You guys are the ones who want everything changed to suit your needs and wants. Most americans just want a fair vote and the right is doing everything in its power to insure the vote is anything but fair.

How quickly you forgot, stop the steal, that obstruction.

 

[neil]

America isn't in a political war, the republicans are. You guys are the ones who want everything changed to suit your needs and wants. Most americans just want a fair vote and the right is doing everything in its power to insure the vote is anything but fair.

How quickly you forgot, stop the steal, that obstruction.

Did I say America's in a political war?

How do you know that the 2020 POTUS election result was fair & that it wasn't stolen?

 

[bongsaway]

Did I say America's in a political war?

How do you know that the 2020 POTUS election result was fair & that it wasn't stolen?

You said he's what we need in a time of political war, or did I read that incorrectly?

Lol, I know because every claim the right made about the stolen election has been proven to be inaccurate or laughed out of court. All sixty or seventy times.

 

[Mycroft]

They shouldn't. It was the part after the peaceful rally. You remember don't ya when they went to the capitol beat the shit out of cops and tore up the capitol chanting hang mike pence? That's why he should go to jail, he instigated it all.

Trump didn't take part and he didn't tell anyone to take part in a riot. He told them to protest peacefully.

I don't think any court could honestly convict and sentence Trump for something he didn't do.

 

[bongsaway]

Trump didn't take part and he didn't tell anyone to take part in a riot. He told them to protest peacefully.

I don't think any court could honestly convict and sentence Trump for something he didn't do.

Sorry to tell you this mycroft but your responses are all the same, no matter what you defend trump. You are dismissed.

 

[Mycroft]

Sorry to tell you this mycroft but your responses are all the same, no matter what you defend trump. You are dismissed.

Yes. My responses are all the same. That's what happens when one speaks the truth.

 

[bongsaway]

Yes. My responses are all the same. That's what happens when one speaks the truth.

Lol, thanks.

 

[Mycroft]

Lol, thanks.

You are welcome.

btw, I see you STILL don't understand the concept of "You are dismissed."

 

[neil]

You said he's what we need in a time of political war, or did I read that incorrectly?

I did say that he's what we need in a time of political war AND I did not say that America's in a political war; I don't know why this is tripping you up.

Lol, I know because every claim the right made about the stolen election has been proven to be inaccurate or laughed out of court. All sixty or seventy times.

This sort of claim doesn't change the fact that on election night, initially Trump had won based on precinct numbers, then many very shady & inexplicable things happened; there's this thing called corruption that can happen. I don't see why it's not possible that there was corruption that compromised the election which could've involved covering of tracks so that if the results were to be challenged in court, they would be able to slip by them.

 

[jpevans]

What do you mean again obstruct justice?

To me, Trump is like a wartime consigliere, a political consigliere; it's what we need in a time of political war. He's not what I really want at the helm of our government, at least in the long run; I actually want a Ron Paul or Justin Amash, but I think they may only be reserved when we have achieved political peace. I also like Thomas Massie & he may be a wildcard in this context, or perhaps someone who comes between the two camps (Trump vs Paul/Amash).

Drumpf is the Crime Boss in your analogy, a consigliere is an adviser to the Crime Boss. Someone like Steven Miller or Steve Bannon.

 

[jpevans]

I did say that he's what we need in a time of political war AND I did not say that America's in a political war; I don't know why this is tripping you up.


This sort of claim doesn't change the fact that on election night, initially Trump had won based on precinct numbers, then many very shady & inexplicable things happened; there's this thing called corruption that can happen. I don't see why it's not possible that there was corruption that compromised the election which could've involved covering of tracks so that if the results were to be challenged in court, they would be able to slip by them.

Drumpf is an idiot, but he knew that the vote count would go back & forth until all votes were counted. He called it over when he was ahead, despite many districts not in. It was such a transparent ploy, that a blind man could see it.

 

[bongsaway]

You are welcome.

btw, I see you STILL don't understand the concept of "You are dismissed."

I get the concept, it makes you feel better when you say it.

 

[bongsaway]

I did say that he's what we need in a time of political war AND I did not say that America's in a political war; I don't know why this is tripping you up.


This sort of claim doesn't change the fact that on election night, initially Trump had won based on precinct numbers, then many very shady & inexplicable things happened; there's this thing called corruption that can happen. I don't see why it's not possible that there was corruption that compromised the election which could've involved covering of tracks so that if the results were to be challenged in court, they would be able to slip by them.

And on and on and on about how the election was stolen with zero proof of any of the accusations. Just give it up already, trump lost. If there was no war why did we need trump?

 

[neil]

Drumpf is the Crime Boss in your analogy, a consigliere is an adviser to the Crime Boss. Someone like Steven Miller or Steve Bannon.

Drumpf is an idiot, but he knew that the vote count would go back & forth until all votes were counted. He called it over when he was ahead, despite many districts not in. It was such a transparent ploy, that a blind man could see it.

I don't know who Drumpf is.

 

[Gateman_Wen]

Should Donald Trump go to prison for what he did on the 6th of January 2021?

Yes. But he won't.

 

[neil]

And on and on and on about how the election was stolen with zero proof of any of the accusations. Just give it up already, trump lost. If there was no war why did we need trump?

Nope; you're the one doing the claiming - that it was a fair election. Nothing I wrote is me claiming that that the election was stolen; I had asked you a question (ie how do you know it was fair).

 

[bongsaway]

Nope; you're the one doing the claiming - that it was a fair election. Nothing I wrote is me claiming that that the election was stolen; I had asked you a question (ie how do you know it was fair).

Are these your words?
This sort of claim doesn't change the fact that on election night, initially Trump had won based on precinct numbers.

Ok, ready, set, go. Let the twisting begin.

I know it was fair because no matter how much the gop tried to prove it wasn't, they proved only one thing, they are sore losers. How many recounts, how many audits do you need to be convinced it was a fair election? I'll answer for you. No amount of proof is enough for you, no matter what you will keep insisting there was some hanky panky going on and the election was stolen from trump.

 

[Rawley]

They shouldn't. It was the part after the peaceful rally. You remember don't ya when they went to the capitol beat the shit out of cops and tore up the capitol chanting hang mike pence? That's why he should go to jail, he instigated it all.

You tried that. He was acquitted. Get over it.

 

[neil]

Are these your words?
This sort of claim doesn't change the fact that on election night, initially Trump had won based on precinct numbers.

I'm glad you did this, because it demonstrates how the truth & facts can be distorted. These were my words, but they're incomplete. Here are my complete words, with the part that you had omitted in bold:

This sort of claim doesn't change the fact that on election night, initially Trump had won based on precinct numbers, then many very shady & inexplicable things happened; there's this thing called corruption that can happen. I don't see why it's not possible that there was corruption that compromised the election which could've involved covering of tracks so that if the results were to be challenged in court, they would be able to slip by them.

Ok, ready, set, go. Let the twisting begin.

I know it was fair because no matter how much the gop tried to prove it wasn't, they proved only one thing, they are sore losers. How many recounts, how many audits do you need to be convinced it was a fair election? I'll answer for you. No amount of proof is enough for you, no matter what you will keep insisting there was some hanky panky going on and the election was stolen from trump.

This is enough for someone who didn't want Trump to win to convince themselves that it was fair, but it has nothing to do with actual knowledge that it was fair. In other words, you must be omniscient in order to be able to actually know that it was fair.

Can you really & sincerely say that you're able to distance yourself from your bias, be objective, and say that there's absolutely no possibility of voter fraud? You cannot know this for certain; nobody can - unless they happen to be omniscient.

I'm not just arbitrarily opting to be so skeptical that the election was fair; I'm doing so because of anomalies that I'm not going to ignore or pretend that they never happened.

Obviously there isn't proof that the election was stolen, otherwise the matter would be closed & the lack of proof of a stolen election doesn't prove the election wasn't stolen - absence of evidences isn't evidence of absence.

 

[jpevans]

Nope; you're the one doing the claiming - that it was a fair election. Nothing I wrote is me claiming that that the election was stolen; I had asked you a question (ie how do you know it was fair).

Who would you believe? Drumpf?

 

[jpevans]

I don't know who Drumpf is.

Okay...