- Joined
- Sep 5, 2005
- Messages
- 30,893
- Reaction score
- 18,623
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
True.It’s certainly not the modern Republican Party.
True.It’s certainly not the modern Republican Party.
Perhaps you could share some of the posts where the left has shown "bigger than you expected " defense for Iran. A statement like that should be easy to back up. Certainly there have been posts criticizing the US involvment, posts questioning the intelligence that caused Trump to act, criticism of Trump for cancelling the pact, etc but I have not seen posts defending Iran . In fact poster after poster on the left has said that Iran should be stopped from getting a nuclear weapon. I do recall one rogue poster who questioned why Iran should get a bomb but that was it.At least on this forum, those optics grew very strong and incredibly fast! Even stronger than I would have expected would happen here, on a forum which consistently leans quite far left.
From time to time, the strength of the momentum and direction on a topic where I never would have predicted such a clear and blatant (but very tactically odd to my thinking) narrative choice - surprises me and makes me just want to observe for a while. To me, this bigger than I expected defense of Iran - feels sort of like the defense and denial of the open border. It will interest me to watch how this "plays" as this momentum continues to roll and grow. I think it certainly has huge potential to turn into heavily used election material, much like issue of the border certainly did in 2024.
Actually, they indulge in demagoguery where they divide the world into two groups and convince people that their group is being harmed by the other group.Throughout our history when adults want to control the behavior of other adults, they invoke children.
That's certainly a response filled with sensible logic.I don't really care what label you want to apply. My posts speak for themselves. If it helps people with weak minds to affix some political label to people's posts to correctly categorize them as a Good Guy or a Bad Guy rather than address the merits of the ideas, then by all means use whatever you want. Maybe you should go with Nazi, I hear they were pretty bad guys!
And yet here you are, taking time out of your day to defend it and make sure Democrats don't give one inch of ground on it.
Why would they let go of an issue where Democrats insist on making themselves look ridiculous? The GOP is delighted every time you do this.
Nope, it's perfectly rational for political movements to not interrupt when their opponents are beclowning themselves. Literally beclowning themselves, in this case. The GOP is playing it perfectly by just handing you the mic and letting you have the floor.
Yet more sensible logic.Step 1 for Democrats winning elections: Stop thinking of voters as rubes, and stop assuming that anytime Republicans win it was because they tricked the voters. Sometimes the voters elect Republicans because they agree with the Republican candidate more than the Democratic candidate on the issues that are important to them.
How about when they neuter children?Throughout our history when adults want to control the behavior of other adults, they invoke children.
If Bernie sanders had been the nominee in 2016 I think he could have potentially won.
How about when they neuter children?
You asked what Democrats could do to develop a "winning strategy." Among my answers is drop the defense of these barbaric procedures, just like medical professionals are doing in Europe.You mean reversible puberty blockers, under the guidance of medical experts and a team of mental health physicians, who are invested in the well-being of the patient so that they don't develop Secondary Sex attributes and thus make transitioning more costly and more prone to social ostracization / lack of employment. Most of the time, Gender Affirming Care leads to patients NOT transitioning.
Look, this is a nuanced issue, and right-wingers are incapable of nuance. I get it. You guys need Black and White answers to every problem in the world. I couldn't live like that, but I think you should have the right to.
Before you respond with swamp-fever talking points pulled out of the darkest recesses 4Chan, show me your medical degree and/or a research paper from which you base your analysis.
Yet more sensible logic.
Your statement is an uneducated take but thank you for underlining my point. Anything happening with THE CHILDREN is under the care and supervision of medical professionals.How about when they neuter children?
You asked what Democrats could do to develop a "winning strategy." Among my answers is drop the defense of these barbaric procedures, just like medical professionals are doing in Europe.
But hey, if you want to double down on transitioning kids, go for it. I generally don't have a problem when Democrats lose elections, so I'm okay if you lose the next one.
I agree with this.If Bernie sanders had been the nominee in 2016 I think he could have potentially won.
They do. And if they don't, you should have no concerns about banning something they don't do, yet you do seem to have those concerns.They don't.
Lol. You're not kiddin anybodyYou made your argument proving my argument. Congratulations, your anger over it just makes the exchange sweeter.
Notice he keeps insisting it’s the Dems wanting kids to transition vs PATENTAL CHOICE. The phrasing is designed to create a trans red scare.Maybe Dems should just throw trans people in the ovens to win elections?
Which reminds me, ridiculous hyperbole is also something your side could tone down a bit. It really makes your candidates -- and their supporters -- come off as unglued.Maybe Dems should just throw trans people in the ovens to win elections?
You keep waving that white flag proudly.Lol. You're not kiddin anybody
Child abuse is not a matter of "PARENTAL CHOICE."Notice he keeps insisting it’s the Dems wanting kids to transition vs PATENTAL CHOICE. The phrasing is designed to create a trans red scare.
Your statement is an uneducated take but thank you for underlining my point. Anything happening with THE CHILDREN is under the care and supervision of medical professionals.
“Trans people have the right to exist” isn’t really unglued. The reaction to that statement is though.Which reminds me, ridiculous hyperbole is also something your side could tone down a bit. It really makes your candidates -- and their supporters -- come off as unglued.
Child abuse is not a matter of "PARENTAL CHOICE."
Which reminds me, ridiculous hyperbole is also something your side could tone down a bit. It really makes your candidates -- and their supporters -- come off as unglued.
You’re defining it as abuse which is a slippery slope I’m not comfortable with. There are folks are think the same about b circumcision. There are folks that feel that way about extremism Christians home schooling their kids with propaganda. Lots of stuff can be construed as abuse. Lots and lots.Child abuse is not a matter of "PARENTAL CHOICE."
They created videos of them firing AR 15s at beer cans because a trans woman’s face was on them.And about circumcision?
"CHILD ABUSE!!!" "THEY'RE CASTRATING THE CHILDREN!"
Speaking of unglued.
They created videos of them firing AR 15s at beer cans because a trans woman’s face was on them.