Should Clarence Thomas be IMPEACHED because of Ginni Thomas's 1/6 participation?

[Ethel2]

We have a replacement....

The proposition is an interesting thought, not without some complexity.

Thomas isn’t responsible for what his wife does.

 

[HangLow]

I know what patriotic Americans would choose in this poll.

MSN

View attachment 67380267

"Justice Clarence Thomas was the lone vote to block the House Select Committee from getting January 6th documents from Donald Trump," Bookbinder wrote. "We know now that his wife participated in the Jan. 6 rally. That creates a clear appearance of bias and a possible major conflict of interest."


The popular politics podcast "No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen" weighed in on its official Twitter account, writing: "Clarence Thomas needs to be investigated immediately."


"If you are a Supreme Court Justice whose wife attended a rally that resulted in the January 6th Capitol attack, you should do the right thing and recuse yourself from voting on the Capitol attack cases," Stern wrote.

​

 

[NoMoreDems-Reps]

I know what patriotic Americans would choose in this poll.

MSN

View attachment 67380267

"Justice Clarence Thomas was the lone vote to block the House Select Committee from getting January 6th documents from Donald Trump," Bookbinder wrote. "We know now that his wife participated in the Jan. 6 rally. That creates a clear appearance of bias and a possible major conflict of interest."


The popular politics podcast "No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen" weighed in on its official Twitter account, writing: "Clarence Thomas needs to be investigated immediately."


"If you are a Supreme Court Justice whose wife attended a rally that resulted in the January 6th Capitol attack, you should do the right thing and recuse yourself from voting on the Capitol attack cases," Stern wrote.

For what ? Trying to stop a Coup ? .....
If you "REALLY" thought Jan 6th was a bad thing , you would 110% support having a Full Forensic Audit of the 6 Contested States!
This would confirm that "THE AMERICAN VOTERS" did or did not Pick the President! But The Media , the DEM's and the DC Status Quo
WILL NOT ALLOW a full forensic Audit to happen! They will not let the American People know for sure that there was or was not a Coup!...

 

[TurtleDude]

But everyone knows what they are trying to do... Remember what Biden did to him in his confirmation hearing? Nasty.

a high tech lynching!

 

[Crovax]

Full Forensic Audit

Is that like a long form birth certificate?

 

[TurtleDude]

Which, if any, of those things did Ginni do? If one person at a peaceful protest does something criminal are all protesters considered to have participated in that crime?

if that is the case-then all the BLM protestors can be indicted for the violent actions of the minority

 

[TurtleDude]

He and the other sexual predator on the SC should be impeached for being sexual predators not for his wife's attendance.

what a stupid comment. but then again, you called Susan Collins a "rape enabler" for voting for Justice Kavanaugh

 

[jpevans]

democrats want to impeach the only black justice

He should have recused. & that ain't the 1st time he's voted to help his wifes agenda. & if her agenda is his agenda (overturning a free & fair election) he should be impeached. IMO

 

[jpevans]

But everyone knows what they are trying to do... Remember what Biden did to him in his confirmation hearing? Nasty.

Biden has apologized to Anita Hill for rushing the investigation into her charges. Should Thomas consider that as something that hurt him?

 

[Lutherf]

He should have recused. & that ain't the 1st time he's voted to help his wifes agenda. & if her agenda is his agenda (overturning a free & fair election) he should be impeached. IMO

Yeah. Running a dictatorship is so much easier if you just get rid of all the opposition.

 

[Cardinal]

I know what patriotic Americans would choose in this poll.

MSN

View attachment 67380267

"Justice Clarence Thomas was the lone vote to block the House Select Committee from getting January 6th documents from Donald Trump," Bookbinder wrote. "We know now that his wife participated in the Jan. 6 rally. That creates a clear appearance of bias and a possible major conflict of interest."


The popular politics podcast "No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen" weighed in on its official Twitter account, writing: "Clarence Thomas needs to be investigated immediately."


"If you are a Supreme Court Justice whose wife attended a rally that resulted in the January 6th Capitol attack, you should do the right thing and recuse yourself from voting on the Capitol attack cases," Stern wrote.

Poorly crafted poll. You created one choice that is eminently unreasonable (no to impeachment) and a choice that is eminently reasonable (yes to recusal), and didn’t make it multiple choice. You’re not going to get an accurate read on the forum’s opinions based on this mistake.

 

[jpevans]

Because his wife is an activist, there are certain cases I strongly believe he should be recused from. However, SCOTUS does not have any ethical rules so wouldn't matter anywauy

True that. SCOTUS has none of the ethics rules that control every other court in the country. This lets activists Like Thomas to be political, while gaslighting the public that they are strict Constitutionalists & above Politics. They are bulletproof, with no oversight, they are the arbiters of ever question. The splits in votes is evidence that there is a political divide on the court.

 

[jpevans]

Yeah. Running a dictatorship is so much easier if you just get rid of all the opposition.

You're not upset by a Justice being involved in the case they decide?

 

[Lutherf]

You're not upset by a Justice being involved in the case they decide?

He's not involved. The case is about ILLEGAL acts committed by protesters, not about protesting an idea you happen to disagree with.

 

[jpevans]

The far left: Thomas should be impeached and recuse himself from his official duties because his wife has an opinion I don't like.

Also the far left: I didn't have these feelings when Ruth Bader Ginsburg publicly protested the last Republican President during State of the Union speeches and criticized Republican candidates for public office.

The Thought Police are showing their colors again. They're no longer satisfied with attacking people who share their thoughts, they now want to go after their family members too. Such a good look. Let me guess, you guys also oppose fascism?

His wife is an activist who was involved in some manner with Jan. 6th. it would have been appropriate to recuse, so as to not even project the appearance of corruption. Even if he had no corrupt intent. He holds a lifetime appointment to the highest court in the land & should at least pretend to be unbiased.

 

[ouch]

For what ? Trying to stop a Coup ? .....
If you "REALLY" thought Jan 6th was a bad thing , you would 110% support having a Full Forensic Audit of the 6 Contested States!
This would confirm that "THE AMERICAN VOTERS" did or did not Pick the President! But The Media , the DEM's and the DC Status Quo
WILL NOT ALLOW a full forensic Audit to happen! They will not let the American People know for sure that there was or was not a Coup!...

This isn't a claim about Thomas starting or stopping a coup. It's spotlighting his actions after the fact as a Supreme Court Justice voting to block the 1/6 Committee getting documents from DJT in order to review his involvement with the 1/6/21 Capitol assault in the effort to prevent the president elect from becoming the next president.

'Thomas was the lone vote to block the House Select Committee from getting January 6th documents from Donald Trump'

 

[ouch]

It's because she's white, isn't it? I mean, if she was black and protesting then we don't mess around with that stuff but white chicks that protest are valid targets for whatever the cops feel is good for conversation at the time.

Holy unbelievable! I can't believe that you actually went there!! There's been no mention of skin color, yet you screwed the pooch for all to see with such a ridiculous assumption. Skin color has NO BEARING whatsoever with this topic!!!

 

[ouch]

If they had any credible reason to investigate her they would be. Why do you care so much?

You're the one who brought up the FBI.

The FBI is already looking into all criminal activity

I assumed that you knew something that I didn't if Ginni Thomas was being investigated by the FBI.

I care about anyone who is in such a powerful position that interferes with the legal transfer of leadership, and, or investigations into illegal interferences with government proceedures.

There are criminal investigations based on all the evidence and video of the riot. Everyone was on video. Their pictures were shared publicly. So far, I'm not aware of her being involved in criminal behavior. You just want her investigated because you don't like her. Everything about your "logic" in this thread is petty ignorance.

Any possible investigation into Ginni Thomas's involvement would be any planning or organizing of what took place on 1/6/21. It's her cheerleading the stop the steal movement that has drawn eyes to her.

How can you be sure? Why aren't you calling for a Congressional investigation to clear her name? Perhaps we need the FBI to harass her and give them evidence that she has never thrown an egg at someone before. Why does the stupidity of your logic end at being butthurt at Thomas's wife? It's your stupid comparison, why not hold them to the same standard?

I'm fine with any investigation into her. If she's clean, no biggie. But, the focus is more on Clarence Thomas and how he rules from the bench that draws eyes on him. As the article in the op suggests, it's a call to possibly impeach or that he should recuse himself with anything to do with 1/6/21 Capitol assault.

 

[Peter]

Should he be impeached?
No idea to be honest but he should have said that his wife was at the protest and offered to step away.

 

[natman]

Let me get this straight - people want to impeach a Supreme Court justice because his wife was at a political rally, even though she didn't do anything remotely illegal before, during or after.

The Democratic spin factories are working overtime.

 

[DarkWizard12]

He should have recused. & that ain't the 1st time he's voted to help his wifes agenda. & if her agenda is his agenda (overturning a free & fair election) he should be impeached. IMO

oh, yea, wouldn't want anyone to have a political agenda while on the court who do they think they are? democrats?

 

[TurtleDude]

Biden has apologized to Anita Hill for rushing the investigation into her charges. Should Thomas consider that as something that hurt him?

anita Hill was a poster child for the evils of affirmative action and how weak minded individuals can be manipulated by sinister forces.

 

[Roadvirus]

He and the other sexual predator on the SC should be impeached for being sexual predators not for his wife's attendance.

Still holding on to that stupid barrel of lies?

 

[TurtleDude]

Still holding on to that stupid barrel of lies?

he called Susan Collins a "rape enabler" for voting for Kavanaugh. He was a major defender of that lying piece of shit I referred to as "Slutnick"-the twit who perjured herself about attending "rape parties". He was a big fan of the creepy porn lawyer who is now a convicted Felon IIRC

 

[NoMoreDems-Reps]

Is that like a long form birth certificate?

You mean the one that Hawaii Gov. Neil Abercrombie couldn't find?

Hawaii governor can't find Obama birth certificate * WorldNetDaily * by Jerome R. Corsi

... Read more

www.wnd.com