There should be a list of additional security questions on voting registration forms. This question should be one of them. You answer "no," you don't get to vote. Period.
An example, one of very many of this ilk, would be: On Sunday morning, a 16 year old girl will have to prove, for example, that she was raped by her 16 year old cousin, would have to just claim that. No, that wouldn’t work, she would lie and say that a stranger did it; she’d have to prove it, i.e. tell the truth. The prosecutor would have to accept her testimony, swab her for DNA and have the cousin arrested before allowing her to get the pill on Sunday morning. And you would see that this will help the related families. Please explain how. And, bty, the governmental staff that would be necessary for this will be very large, but your pro big government, correct?yes, even girls under 18 should have this option.
but only if they have been raped.
An example, one of very many of this ilk, would be: On Sunday morning, a 16 year old girl will have to prove, for example, that she was raped by her 16 year old cousin, would have to just claim that. No, that wouldn’t work, she would lie and say that a stranger did it; she’d have to prove it, i.e. tell the truth. The prosecutor would have to accept her testimony, swab her for DNA and have the cousin arrested before allowing her to get the pill on Sunday morning. And you would saw that this will help the related families. Please explain how. And, bty, the governmental staff that would be necessary for this will be very large, but your pro big government, correct?
Yes, then a mother could get one for her under age daughter. This works for me.The morning after pill should be available to any woman of legal age for any reason whatsoever.
Nothing like the self-righteous gloating in their self perceive value.
YES. That is how it should be.Actually - rape victims are encouraged to go to a hospital where a woman will handle their care - swab for DNA and administer the pill and give other necessary assistance.
They can press charges if the like - but they dont' have to divulge details if they don't want to.
YES. That is how it should be.
Please look at what I was responding to.
I'm sorry but humans are not animals.
Animals do not have a concious and that is the difference.
You just defined why we should protect that life because it is so helpless. What could be more helpless than a being that can't feel pain, has no consciousness, is a few cells big, can't think, can't see, can't hear, can't smell, can't eat, can't drink, can't fart, can't do anything.
And who are you to say that if will face a likely situation that it will be aborted naturally anyway? What does that even mean? What is a "natural abortion"? Miscarriages are unfortunate events that occur due to many factors. Some could be because of the mom using drugs or not taking care of herself but more often than not they just happen, especially with women who have never had children.
Where does it stop? So, first its rape victims should be required to take it. Next, lets go with women who are living below the poverty line because obviously they can't support the child and we'll end up paying for it. After that, women that have a better chance of passing along a hereditary disease because we don't want a bunch of autistic kids running around we have to support. Before long, we are breeding a perfect society. Wow, sounds kind of like Nazi Germany circa 1940ish. Keep spewing your "we know whats better for you than you do" rhetoric buddy.
Ah, yes. I remember reading all about the formal logical fallacy of comparison to the Nazis in this month's journal of philosophy.
I wish people would stop being so quick to accuse others of logical fallacies.
Maybe I've been watching too many reruns of "Law and Order: SVU," but I don't understand the premise of the OP's question. Are rape victims not provided with the morning-after pill if they seek medical treatment?
My concern is for the health of women, specifically young girls. If the morning-after pill is available over-the-counter, it's going to be acquired and misused. There is the chance of bleeding, and the pill can also disrupt a cycle, creating another problem if it's used not as the one-time-only pill it's intended to be but, rather, as a primary means of birth control.
Try Tony Blair. That man was terrible.I could care less if it is an actual fallacy or not... I just wish people would stop trying to demonize anything they don't like by comparing it to the Nazi's or Hitler. At least be creative. Throw in some Stalin or Pol Pot. Hitler doesn't own evil.
Try Tony Blair. That man was terrible.
Where does it stop? So, first its rape victims should be required to take it.
Wait, who said that?
Nobody is saying that rape victims or anyone else should be REQUIRED to use Plan B.
Wait, who said that?
Nobody is saying that rape victims or anyone else should be REQUIRED to use Plan B.
Someone said that it they thought it should be "almost required" of a rape victim.
I didn't but I will now...
That was Bodi... damn guy is always creating controversy.
It absolutely should be offered free of charge for any rape victim though and she should be given full information about what could happen if she does get pregnant, her options past those days when Plan B is effective, what it will cost, and other relevant information. This will be a lot of info, but if there is any chance that she is likely to get an abortion later due to this, and she can take Plan B, it should be impressed upon her that Plan B is absolutely the better option, from most any perspective.
That's nuts.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?