• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Shots fired on Michigan State University campus; police ask everyone to shelter in place

we have to identify who is committing the violence and why

you can grab web sites and look/compare, but the majority are men, and a big % are repeat offenders/previously incarcerated
the majority of murders they use guns, disproportionate are blacks. You can google more on studies on single family homes and the impacts/percentages

I used to think poverty was a big factor - I think that less and less. the links between drugs and homicide are real

knowing the above general information, we as a society need to stop releasing hardened criminals early AND install a punishment that is a big deterrent. I can stop almost all the speeding on the highways in the USA - do you want to know how? $15,000 penalty for every speeding ticket you get. There, done. People would stop speeding FAST if we did that, very hard penalties work.

attack the drug problem which BTW kills far far more people that violence does every year

we need mental asylums to help mentally ill, protect them from themselves and others


those all three would make immediate impacts - but in a free society people can still be violent if they choose. We feed American's violence every minute of the day - is it any wonder we are so violent ?







Bigger social Safety Net to address poverty and mental illness and the decriminaliztion of drugs.

I could get behind that.
 
Guys... keep on comparing Guns to Cars.

It just continues to make the argument for more State authority over firearms possible.

I gave a valid reason why they can be...please directly explain why it's not valid. If something isnt working, why try it elsewhere?

If it's car safety that makes the difference, how can manufacturers make 'safer' guns? Modern guns are very safe to operate and have at least a couple, if not more, safety features.

If it's training to operate, how does training stop people from using guns in crimes? They dont care about bystanders, for example, and training makes people better shots.

So please explain why cars arent a valid comparison?
 
this man/family wasn't next


this man wasn't a victim


police were fast and killed this guy before he did damage

and yet people are next (about one per hour).

kids, just like your own, are next.
 
and yet people are next (about one per hour).

kids, just like your own, are next.

far more likely to get hurt in car accidents, or suicide, or drug overdoses

yes, the could die by someone violent using a gun, or a knife, or something else - and if they face that threat I hope them are able to defend themselves
 
I gave a valid reason why they can be...please directly explain why it's not valid. If something isnt working, why try it elsewhere?

If it's car safety that makes the difference, how can manufacturers make 'safer' guns? Modern guns are very safe to operate and have at least a couple, if not more, safety features.

If it's training to operate, how does training stop people from using guns in crimes? They dont care about bystanders, for example, and training makes people better shots.

So please explain why cars arent a valid comparison?
Training would decrease the amount of unintentional deaths from firearms.

If one is required to train in the use of a firearm before the purchase of a firearm then one knows how to properly handle a firearm safely.
 
Bigger social Safety Net to address poverty and mental illness and the decriminaliztion of drugs.

I could get behind that.

drugs is a big part of the problem and you want MORE ? that's going to lead to more problems IMO - places with low drug use have far less problems with violence - is that true ?
 
Training would decrease the amount of unintentional deaths from firearms.

If one is required to train in the use of a firearm before the purchase of a firearm then one knows how to properly handle a firearm safely.

lets put NRA training into schools - deal ?
 
that's not the problem - getting rid of of one type of weapon does NOTHING to stop violent people

anti-gun people don't want to stop violence - they just want violence to use different weapons
So, I assume you know how to stop violence? Please tell us. I am not totally anti-gun but am anti-semi-automatic weapons as they are used only to kill other people. Get rid of them and the death toll will noticeably drop.
 
I'm not sure why we can't fix this problem. It's simple. Get rid of guns, hand out enough reparations money so that no body needs to worry about finances any more and arrest all the white supremacists. Problem solved!
 
So, I assume you know how to stop violence? Please tell us. I am not totally anti-gun but am anti-semi-automatic weapons as they are used only to kill other people. Get rid of them and the death toll will noticeably drop.

Why do you think a false statement is a good way to initiate a conversation?
 
I've proved it over and over

its simple


we have literally 200 million more guns or more

this isn't new information
That is all violent crime not just gun violence . Aggrevated assault being pointed to as the most common data point on that chart.

After decreasing gun violence in the 80's to the 2010's it started increasing again as more and more firearms are being sold every year..

Now we see situations like firearms are the leading cause of death among those in this country between the ages of 1-19. The US in 2020 saw 4,357 firearms deaths in children. The next in line was Australia with 10.

We have a lot of guns in this country. I am not a gun abolitionist by any means but something is terribly broken and since Sandy Hook when children were murdered and not only this country did nothing but the counter to that massacre was vitriolic conspiracy that furthered ruined lives and laughing a President who dared to cry about the murder of children.... yeah... there is something deeply wrong here.
 
drugs is a big part of the problem and you want MORE ? that's going to lead to more problems IMO - places with low drug use have far less problems with violence - is that true ?
Take the criminal element of drugs. Drug users aren't inherently violent.

Prohibition causes a lot of violence.
 
far more likely to get hurt in car accidents, or suicide, or drug overdoses

yes, the could die by someone violent using a gun, or a knife, or something else - and if they face that threat I hope them are able to defend themselves
hell, people can die in the bathtub. that's why cars shouldn't be regulated.
 
That is all violent crime not just gun violence . Aggrevated assault being pointed to as the most common data point on that chart.

After decreasing gun violence in the 80's to the 2010's it started increasing again as more and more firearms are being sold every year..

Now we see situations like firearms are the leading cause of death among those in this country between the ages of 1-19. The US in 2020 saw 4,357 firearms deaths in children. The next in line was Australia with 10.

We have a lot of guns in this country. I am not a gun abolitionist by any means but something is terribly broken and since Sandy Hook when children were murdered and not only this country did nothing but the counter to that massacre was vitriolic conspiracy that furthered ruined lives and laughing a President who dared to cry about the murder of children.... yeah... there is something deeply wrong here.

Reference bold:

But while gun violence was decreasing, the number of guns was rising as well.
 
Training would decrease the amount of unintentional deaths from firearms.

Possibly, but that's not what I wrote, we're discussing intentional gun crimes here.

And you are presupposing that many/most people dont get training? Why is that? Do you have data on that? I'm not sure it would even reflect what people get 'growing up' with guns, like hunter training, etc.

If one is required to train in the use of a firearm before the purchase of a firearm then one knows how to properly handle a firearm safely.

There are 4 basic rules that are readily available, very logical and literally universal, everyone knows and shares them...do you?... and so it's not difficult. Some gun shops give them out on purchase. I'd be fine with making that mandatory.

 
Last edited:
How?

And - self-defense? No?

You would need a Constitutional amendment. Then do a gun buy back. Permitting process for all hunting rifles.

Self defense not a valid use case
 
Reference bold:

But while gun violence was decreasing, the number of guns was rising as well.
There was a weapons ban in there during the period I reference.

Then that sunsetted and weapon sales increased and here we are.
 
saw this tweet by a mom on twitter...


"Every day since Sandy Hook I’ve made sure to memorize my kids’ outfits as they head off to school."
 
Possibly, but that's not what I wrote, we're discussing intentional gun crimes here.

And you are presupposing that many/most people dont get training? Why is that? Do you have data on that? I'm not sure it would even reflect what people get 'growing up' with guns, like hunter training, etc.



There are 4 basic rules that are readily available, very logical and literally universal, everyone knows and shares them...do you?... and so it's not difficult. Some gun shops give them out on purchase. I'd be fine with making that mandatory.

Oh... i am talking about all gun violence.

A lot of gun violence is from unintentional discharges.

That is like the lowest of hanging fruit to go after to get gun death and injuries down.
 
Back
Top Bottom