• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

She's baaaack....lol [W:446]

Top Cat said:
There is nothing to debate. Palin is back at Fake News. The rest is just nonsense. The premise of this thread had nothing to do with debate. It was American playing his typical baiting of those on the left.

As to your clever comments...yawn. The pompous pap you're smearing is vapid.
Click to expand...

It's just awful how American posted this thread and forced others to post for 20 pages. I mean, really--the nerve of him.
 
Gaugingcatenate said:
Riiiiiiiiiiiing Riiiiiiiiiiiing Riiiiiiiiiiing

I am sure all this prodigious uber-literacy that you so magnanimously, so superbly display for us here... with just that single sentence so lavishly laden with myriad ineffable facets of hinted yet hidden significance...is a truly valuable trait in a politician...so much so as to be chuckled at.

That "progressive" folk might actually, and often DO, tend to speak in this tone, educated haughty-speak, so high above, so far beyond the realm of the common, common sense... which if common sense were actually anywhere in residence would surely not use terms/phrases such as ..."Overseas Contingency Operations". One wonders, to do what? What was actually accomplished by so phrasing? Yes, we put the real offending phrase under a canopy of camouflage netting, but hiding it from whom? From our enemies that have attacked us, actions that do actually necessitate that we engage, that we have a war on terror that we need fight... against "them" [who exactly are "they" again? ...remind me]?. Should "they" not at least know we are thus engaged, since they have with their actions, and in their very plain words, declared this war against us??

Riiiiiiiiiiiing Riiiiiiiiiiiing Riiiiiiiiiiing

Or was it hidden from ourselves? Is it us that is not really supposed to be aware?

Then when that crazed jihadi in our own ranks shoots and kills 13, wounding an additional 30, that is classified nonsensically as "work place violence"? How really smart are those... those seemingly intellectually incapable of calling a rose a rose?

I'll take Sarah's pragmatic common sense approach any day over these wondrous word wizards from Washington. I mean, right?

Riiiiiiiiiiiing Riiiiiiiiiiiing Riiiiiiiiiiing


Can't somebody, anybody please please just answer that darn phone...??? Seems somebody calling from Benghazi still hasn't gotten much of an answer...am pretty sure Sarah Palin would not have left those guys hanging like that, left them high and dry out there in the shifting sands of Libya... common sense would dictate, actually should have been a no-brainer, that you help your fellow Americans in times of trouble. We now know that the O and Hill didn't quite match up to the task, but they are each skilled with too many words...

BTW, how IS that Hopey Changey thing working out for us?

You may just be Joaquin, but maybe might start running if you want to catch up...:mrgreen:
Click to expand...




When has Palin ever showed any common sense?
 
American said:
The author of the link if full of ****. Because it's obvious that the base didn't embrace Romney, who is more educated than Obama. He has both a law degree and MBA from Harvard, and I didn't see any embracing of that. So his premise about educated candidates falls on its face.
Click to expand...




Romney is a fool and he showed it last year.
 
but the ones who nominated him were more foolish. One of the things I think about when I review my own political leaning tendencies is the caliber of the people who they run for office. It dont look like I will be sliding back to the right anytime soon. I wonder if Palin back on Faux is to get her face out there for a run against Hillary?
shrubnose said:
Romney is a fool and he showed it last year.
Click to expand...
 
What a hideous matchup that would be.
 
mak2 said:
but the ones who nominated him were more foolish. One of the things I think about when I review my own political leaning tendencies is the caliber of the people who they run for office. It dont look like I will be sliding back to the right anytime soon. I wonder if Palin back on Faux is to get her face out there for a run against Hillary?
Click to expand...

That would be a great race - Two incredibly well-read women, with incredible foreign policy experience, both incredibly articulate ... looks like a toss up to me ...
 
Gaugingcatenate said:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/bias-media/163518-shes-baaaack-lol-5.html#post1061925274

read that regarding the basics of my interest in Palin.

Your side's who is obsessed with the lady. From what I know of her, I am guessing that may just stem from the fact that she is a woman, strong, strictly on her own has achieved far more than average power/influence. Certainly proven to be independent in her thinking, at least two prominent, political, now TV commentator role, again, careers, plus she has a family...everything liberal women strive for, strive to be... really having it all.

Except, she has even more... she is a wife who actually seems to get along, enjoy her husband as a man, might say a real man. A man she is the proud mother of many children with, one a "challenged" child who liberal women may think she should have aborted. A hunter, so she is a dreaded guns rights girl, because she understands our history, the wisdom of the founders. She also has, shudder, a faith that she actually seems to believe in [how could that be??!!]

Oh, and that big R behind her name, an even bigger C.

so...

Rather listen to her thunder thighness, hefty Hillary...or nasal-whiny stretched face Pelosi I am guessing...talking about floating your boat, countenances that could sink a thousand ships.
Click to expand...




Hilary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi won elections.

Palin got her backside handed to her. She's a loser.
 
shlunka said:
Christianity has been #1 for hundreds of years in the U.S, you don't become #1 and stay there for so long without lots of credibility. People will believe just about anything, Fox news takes advantage of that, and inserts political bias with every opportunity.
Click to expand...
When FOX NEWS gave people a choice between state run propaganda, and news and opinion shows that had balance... people chose FOX.

For those on the left used to a monopoly of state propaganda, someone injecting the views of BOTH sides seems like an assault.

Don't believe me... OK... you might believe Fineman

Fineman: 'Mainstream Media Party' is over - politics - Howard Fineman | NBC News
WASHINGTON - A political party is dying before our eyes ...I'm talking about the "mainstream media,"

...The AMMP, meanwhile, is regarded with ever growing suspicion by American voters, viewers and readers, who increasingly turn for information and analysis only to non-AMMP outlets that tend to reinforce the sectarian views of discrete slices of the electorate.

Still, the notion of a neutral, non-partisan mainstream press was, to me at least, worth holding onto. Now it's pretty much dead, at least as the public sees things.

The seeds of its demise were sown with the best of intentions in the late 1960s...

The crusades of Vietnam and Watergate seemed like a good idea at the time, even a noble one, not only to the press but perhaps to a majority of Americans. The problem was that, once the AMMP declared its existence by taking sides, there was no going back. A party was born.

It was not accident that the birth coincided with an identity crisis in the Democratic Party. The ideological energy of the New Deal had faded; Vietnam and various social revolutions of the ’60s were tearing it apart. Into the vacuum came the AMMP, which became the new forum for choosing Democratic candidates...
Click to expand...
 
Gaugingcatenate said:
So why are you bringing up Obama, thought you said this thread was supposed to be about Palin??? I guess you did open it up a bit when you started talking about laying down with dogs...
Click to expand...





Since we're talking about dogs, whatever happen to Romney's dog?

You know, the one that spent 12 hours on top of Romney's car.
 
No Z, Faux and Rush and the others exist simply because some (thought resistant) people want confirmation bias and thought leaders. Not only is the wrong group refereed to as low information voters,the RW suffers from selective information thought formation. Faux keeps the base happily misinformed.
zimmer said:
When FOX NEWS gave people a choice between state run propaganda, and news and opinion shows that had balance... people chose FOX.

For those on the left used to a monopoly of state propaganda, someone injecting the views of BOTH sides seems like an assault.

Don't believe me... OK... you might believe Fineman

Fineman: 'Mainstream Media Party' is over - politics - Howard Fineman | NBC News
Click to expand...
 
Alert the presses! We have just found out that liberals do not like conservatives!

I think nowadays a good litmus test whether someone is a real conservative is if liberals hate them.
 
ChrisL said:
So why are you including those? Everybody makes gaffes. Even the President Obama has made MANY as has Vice President Biden. Nobody is perfect.
Click to expand...




Did anyone ever say that Sarah Palin was perfect?

If so, that person lied.
 
Jetboogieman said:
My heads exploding with joy.

People like Palin only provide endless entertainment.

Her particular brand of conservatism, joined by people like Bachmann, Gomez and Cruz, make for some whacky, insane entertaining programming.
Click to expand...

That would be awesome if they give Bachmann her own show next...
 
head of joaquin said:
Tea partiers are cute in a toxic waste kind of way.
Click to expand...

Yeah, strengthen the tea party more and more... primary all the moderates out... great idea according to the democrats
 
shlunka said:
Christianity has been #1 for hundreds of years in the U.S, you don't become #1 and stay there for so long without lots of credibility. People will believe just about anything, Fox news takes advantage of that, and inserts political bias with every opportunity.
Click to expand...

You are so correcto-mundo. I agree. People will believe just about anything. Good post!
 
Hey, they could both do a show together and have dueling dumbness Tuesdays or something.
SheWolf said:
That would be awesome if they give Bachmann her own show next...
Click to expand...
 
Fiddytree said:
I'd prefer it if she largely focused on a pro-life message, which she is particularly apt to talk about.

I get that many Fox viewers like to be told that they, the average citizen, is smarter, more capable, more talented, more intellectual than their elite counterparts, but it's not really true.

Instead, what she should be doing is bore the piss out of their viewers. It would be good for them. Start talking about day-to-day workings as a politician, talk about bureaucracy seriously, talk about lobbyists seriously, talk about anything seriously. Forget the soundbytes. Bore the piss out of the audience so they will actually learn something.

Sadly, it seems that being a masturbator to the ego of the masses is all she is doing.
Click to expand...


I watched her on Van Susteren a few times, and I was really bored.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom