- Joined
- Oct 20, 2009
- Messages
- 28,431
- Reaction score
- 16,990
- Location
- Sasnakra
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
again, your fantasies are not fact. how can i be worried about something i don't know happened? YOU certainly can't provide any evidence that anything like that occured.
*gives you more wool to cover your eyes with*
Believe whatever you want, then.
I think you're being thick and callous, hiding behind "24 years ago" in an effort to avoid the truth. The truth being that she admitted to treating people differently because *of* their race - and it likely made things more complicated for them.
(Based on her own words.)
And if the full length video of her speech is out there and you've seen it then by all means - link it.
It's over the top hyperpartisan hysterics on her part. The woman admitted to what is essentially a crime no?
Why should she keep her job, even if it was "24 years ago"?
Speaking of damages, since she did "admit" it shouldnt she and the government be paying damages to those she cheated?
It's over the top hyperpartisan hysterics on her part. The woman admitted to what is essentially a crime no?
Why should she keep her job, even if it was "24 years ago"?
Speaking of damages, since she did "admit" it shouldnt she and the government be paying damages to those she cheated?
Rev...easy on the hype there big guy!
Are you going to tell me you have never given a slightly lesser amount of customer service to someone because they came across to you like you were inferior to them? never shorted them some cheese on a taco, or intentionally pumped an extra bit of gas? Hell I remember my sys ad days...people would call us up and the more they treated people like ass tthe less liklihood there was we were going to be able to magically recovery their data.
The woman didnt say "I mistreated all white people" or "I denied him service" even. IF we were to take her at her WORST, she said "I didnt help him as much as I could have because he came across to me like I was his inferior." How is that a crime? And IF it were, it was a crime 24 years ago...pretty sure there are statutes of limitations on poor customer service...and not even poor...reduced, later followed up by MORE customer service. And why should something she did 24 years ago in a DIFFERENT job have ANY bearing on today in a completely different job?
I just simply dont get the insistent outrage.
Now that the WH has apologized, will Obama be blamed for a double standard? No, not with the liberal press, he won't. But maybe on Fox. Ha!
Rev...easy on the hype there big guy!
Are you going to tell me you have never given a slightly lesser amount of customer service to someone because they came across to you like you were inferior to them? never shorted them some cheese on a taco, or intentionally pumped an extra bit of gas? Hell I remember my sys ad days...people would call us up and the more they treated people like ass tthe less liklihood there was we were going to be able to magically recovery their data.
The woman didnt say "I mistreated all white people" or "I denied him service" even. IF we were to take her at her WORST, she said "I didnt help him as much as I could have because he came across to me like I was his inferior." How is that a crime? And IF it were, it was a crime 24 years ago...pretty sure there are statutes of limitations on poor customer service...and not even poor...reduced, later followed up by MORE customer service. And why should something she did 24 years ago in a DIFFERENT job have ANY bearing on today in a completely different job?
I just simply dont get the insistent outrage.
"I didn't give him the full force of what I could do. I did enough so that when he - I assumed the Dept. of Agriculture sent him to me, either that or the Georgia Dept. of Agriculture - and he needed to go back and report that I did try to help him. So I took him to a white lawyer that had attended some of the training that we provided; because chapter 12 bankruptcy had just been enacted for the family farm. So I figured that if I'd take him to one of them that his own kind would take care of him.
That's when it was revealed to me that it's about the poor VS those who have. And not so much about white - it is about white and black - but it's not. You know, it opened my eyes. Because I took him to one of his own. . . . "
I actually don't care either way... I find the crowds reaction far more appalling than this woman of god's admittance to racism in her past... I also find it superficial the outrage shown by some on the left, whom, when dan rather used forged documents white washed it as no big deal....
That's my take. Give the old bat her job back. But to think she should be paid damages? Sure, right after those she "victimized" gets paid by her. [/sarcasm]
If she just treated him with less respect and help *because* and *only* because of his attitude - then we wouldn't even BE discussing this.
Here she admits that she took his RACE into consideration on how she initially dealt with his case.
If it was just his attitude it wouldn't be a story of how race was put aside to consider financial situation and genuinely helping someone - and we wouldn't be discussing this at all.
I think this video pretty well says it all.
Fox points to Breitbart as a source for the video.
Everyone else points to Fox as a source for the government's knee-jerk firing.
I need to start watching MSNBC so I can run them over every time they **** up - so many people are keeping their critical eyes on Fox they're ignoring everyone else. *that* is actually really annoying the **** out of me.
One would think that a competent news service would have checked out the source, before running their mouths off wouldn’t you?
Of course saying the words competent news services, and fox in the same sentence should be a punishable offence. misdemeanor …whatever.
One would think that a competent news service would have checked out the source, before running their mouths off wouldn’t you?
Of course saying the words competent news services, and fox in the same sentence should be a punishable offence. misdemeanor …whatever.
LOL - as if the government checked out their source that they depended on to FIRE someone? I thought that Fox was suppose to be a worthless, meaningless, miniscule news station that didn't even earn it's place in the press pool?
But suddenly Fox is important? Suddenly everyone's watching them? I think this prooves that Fox is actually a solid alternative news source to the brown nosers elsewhere. And everyone else is trying to use this issue as yet another opportunity to go "what's that over there!" while they set the barn on fire.
What else is going on right now that *no one* is talking about?
Of course MSNBC's sole purpose, instead of reporting on news at this moment, is to accuse Fox of being racist in this situation - while they buddy up with minorities because they're gauranteed votes and parade blacks and women around like they're prizes won post game action.
wow, that's saome pretty wild rhetoric. and completely unfounded.
Wait....**** right wing media.
Wait....
The children in The Obama's adminstration overrreact to a story that they did not bother to check out -- even thought it was from a source that they, themselves, say is against them -- and the fault here lies with the media?
That's rich. Is there ANYTHING you hold The Obama's administration accountable for?
All of this nonsense is just another example of the petulant nature of The Obama's administration.
in case you hadn't noticed, i do hold the obama admin responsible.
Yes. Thats why you started the topic with:in case you hadn't noticed, i do hold the obama admin responsible.
**** right wing media.
Yes. Thats why you started the topic with:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?