So explain to me this quote from her speech (I wish we had the full speech to discuss)
"And not so much about white - it is about white and black - but it's not"
Is this a faux-pas?
She obviously was discussing something that happened *in the past* and using past-tense.
But then she switched to a present-term reference, affirming her belief that "it is about white and black" - by switching to present tense, to me, that still shows that she feels race DOES play a role.
*maybe* less of a role in her decision making - but still an issue to her none the less . . . and it just brings into question *everything* she does.
My husband, long before we met, threatened to kill a co-worker of his. He had to go to court over it, in fact.
Does it mean anything now? Not really - he *is* different and more mature. but if someone were to consider that and then bring it into a question of character - it IS a legitimate concern.
You cannot *get* inside someone's head to fully understand them - there is no way of guaranteeing that someone is no longer ___. You never know - maybe they are, maybe their view or issue is latent and will recur at some point like a cancer - you just don't know. Employing someone who has a questionable history is taking a chance.
This is why being a good and decent person is a key value and very important. Faux Pas and wrongful thoughts and deeds CAN and DO come back to haunt you - and sometimes it's understandable - sometimes it's not.