LiberalFINGER
Active member
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2004
- Messages
- 261
- Reaction score
- 5
Am I reading this right? There was a book that taught that it was OK to give Tommy a blow job as long as he had a condom on? And there was seriously a chance a 3rd grade teacher was showing students how to perform oral sex. Third graders are like 8 and 9 year olds! If that happend that teacher should be shown the door and fast. Sex Ed. should be something taught in health class at a late Jr. high early high school level. But it should be taught with real answers to real questions. Not just glossed over with "sex, it's bad for you- don't do it until your married."vauge said:For example, did I read in USA Today recently that text books Texas will only be allowed to teach abstinence for birth control.
Yep, because (I believe) the other teaching method said that sex is OK. In the 5th grade homo, hetero, or any type of sexual is good - should not be taught. It should not be taught that it is ok to give tommy a blow job- as long as he has a condom on - which is what was new in the books and thrown out. There was a teacher that showed 3rd graders how to give head to a banana with a condom on it!! (heard on the radio - cannot back up that claim)
How does one confer to teach sex without saying it is ok?
If we could teach our children about sex and not tell them that it is fun and good to do - I am all for it. Because, yes kids do have a brain and a choice.
AMEN!Am I reading this right? There was a book that taught that it was OK to give Tommy a blow job as long as he had a condom on? And there was seriously a chance a 3rd grade teacher was showing students how to perform oral sex. Third graders are like 8 and 9 year olds! If that happend that teacher should be shown the door and fast.
I agree, but I'm not sure on the timing.Sex Ed. should be something taught in health class at a late Jr. high early high school level. But it should be taught with real answers to real questions. Not just glossed over with "sex, it's bad for you- don't do it until your married."
Well I'd begin by telling them that I like to use live bait. I've always found that lures and manmade baits don't have nearly the same..err...Oh! FISTING! now that's completely different!vauge said:Now that I think about it, my wife, a Junior Art High teacher, told me that kids are asking the sex ed teacher how to perform "fisting" correctly. How do you answer that?
How do you know the girls would make it known they wouldn't want anything to do with it? Maybe they'd love it. It might be their idea. Or it might be the guy who wants to be "fisted." I just think in a public school setting I'd stick to teaching basic sex ed. There'd most likely be topics concerning hetro, oral, homo etc.. but depending on the school board I doubt there'd be much outside the lines of that. But I could be wrong. I guess you could end up talking scat, golden showers, bestiality and the whole gamit, but I don't think so.LiberalFINGER said:Silence is a bad idea in that case. I beleive it would be best to adress the question as clinically as possible and make it known that fisting is a hazardous behavior. (not to mention the girls in the class would make it clear that they don't want anyone trying it.)
I didn't. Nor did I imply that it did.Who said the question came from a girl?
How do you know the girls would make it known they wouldn't want anything to do with it? Maybe they'd love it. It might be their idea. Or it might be the guy who wants to be "fisted." I just think in a public school setting I'd stick to teaching basic sex ed. There'd most likely be topics concerning hetro, oral, homo etc.. but depending on the school board I doubt there'd be much outside the lines of that. But I could be wrong. I guess you could end up talking scat, golden showers, bestiality and the whole gamit, but I don't think so.
Don't assume it was a liberal who brought it up.I guess I'll have to chime in on an obviously liberal duscussion. You dudes make me sick. Fisting and crapping on each other, only a liberal could get off on such a tangent.
It is here that we agree completely. The school should not be teaching morality, but should be teaching cold hard facts.As for the school system, they should be reponsible for teaching anatomy of the human body, the reproductive process, and the consequences of unprotected sex, leave it there. We learned that in Health, 9th grade. Anything else is a sick teacher trying to get off. Maybe it's OK to make condoms accessible, but if the kids are screwing, they know how to use it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?