Re: 911 WAS an inside job.
teacher said:
Before I go on this Mr. arussian. Some questions. They will help me post this in the best way for you. Seriously. What is your professional back ground? Are you mechanically inclined? Are you good with tools? Are you a History/Language guy or a math/science guy? Can you change a tire in under 10 minutes. How is your chemistry/physics/electronics knowledge? Can you find me real time film of #2 collapsing and being hit by the plane. Have you seen the show on PBS "NOVA" title "why the towers fell". If not read the transcript. I did. The man who designed the towers is on it. Have you read the magazine Popular Mechanics article about debunking the theories stated on this thread? I didn't. I hear it's solid. Have you read the ten or so posts by me starting at #103 this thread? If not, I won't bother. If you did do you understand and if so are there any questions? Be specific. Do you think that steel can lose rigidity at 1000 degrees F? Not melt? Just weaken a little. Are you familiar with the grades of steel and hardware (Nuts and bolts)? Do you know any welders you can check my thoughts against? That is important. Are you willing to accept the possibility I am right? Are you totally against the possibility that this COULD have been a terrorist attack? What is you religion if any?I am able to do so for you. If I thought you were right I would be just as stubborn if not more exposing such. and much more convincing than any on this site so far. As a matter of fact I could use the existing evidence to make such a case. Are you familiar with fire alarms and suppression systems at all? I am only going to address the actual science of the collapse, not who was where (Bush, the Saudi's ect). If I tell you that I'm speaking the truth as I know it do you believe me? Do you think I have an agenda or ulterior motive here? Have you seen how Mr. Brooks can't answer simple questions any American should know. How old are you? What are your family members jobs? First of all you must read and comprehend all of my posts. Second you must read the NOVA transcripts. This show came out a month or two after 9/11. On 9/11 I said "I wonder how long until the NOVA program. I am serious sir. Please don't jerk my chain. I will do this for YOU. I feel this matter that important. Can you find me blue prints of the steel, fire alarm, sprinkler system, and water mains for the towers? I'm dead ready, are you? If you are a hard, smart worker willing to sweat and learn I can give you a job in Tampa after a few months. That would prove it to you. If you saw what I know. Have you seen my post about throwing snowballs at the East German guards in Berlin over the wall in the late 80's? I've been in East Berlin before the wall fell. Got some funny US Soviet stories. Russian chicks are hot.
...
Rather strange to hear all that questions. How do they relate to the matter of facts? Your opponents don’t care about such peculiarities as my religion and my family members professional background.
Well, I’m in mid thirties, currently agnostic, studied biology and also some social and computer sciences (in Russia and later in US). I always was paid for doing research relating to biology and behavior. (It is based on statistcis: there is effect/there is no effect, and if there is, then what really has caused it). Nevertheless, I remember physics and mechanics, perhaps, at the level that is a little bit higher than that of an average guy.
You should not write the whole paper just for
me. It should be
for all who are concerned about this case and its’ strangeness. What I (as well as many-many others in US and abroad) want to know now is just how the WTC buildings
could collapse without explosives in the way they did, leaving aside was the whole of 9/11 inside job or not.
I think that if you can, then for the sake of your position you should clarify the following matters and answer the following questions:
1) The core of WTC2 collapsed together with the floors, how does it fit to the pan-cake – domino explanation?
2) Taking into consideration that the top portion of WTC2 has had significant inclination shortly before the collapse, what force has ruined the core of WTC2?
3) Why the core has ruined:
a) so fast;
b) so completely (just to the very bottom);
and
c) so regularly in all of the directions?
I’ve read just a brief summary of explanation that was presented in NOVA, not the whole transcript. If I’ll find it I’ll provide a link. “Popular mechanics” revelations are
here together with the replies.
P.S. To my opinion as a relative newbie and bystander to this subject your opponents has succeeded much more in presenting cohesive picture of the event. It is kind of your Waterloo, teacher, at least in this thread, so do your best, please.