LOL! You couldn't be more wrong or dishonest about this.
https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1093555871651635205
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/2/20/17031772/mueller-indictments-grand-jury
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...estigated-in-trump-russia-probe-idUSKCN1LU2BH
https://www.businessinsider.com/who-has-been-charged-in-russia-investigation-mueller-trump-2017-12
I get the impression you are dishonest...at least in suggesting there have been no indictments,
Take some time to read this instead of just lying all the time.
People mare not as stupid as you seem to think. So far every post has been a lie...so anyone betting on you is a total looser
Both Papadopolous and Flynn's indictments directly were related to coordinating with Russian agents/officials.
Why are you posting lies?
Lol
Uber liberal and cheif Trump resister Seth Abramson blows a bunch of snot and liberal quote it like it's Gospel.
Perhaps we should start quoting fellow nutjob Alex Jones since we're going down this road.
Yeah tons of indictments, guilty pleas, but you think that is nothing. :lamo
You guys are so desperate and the Mueller report hasn't even been released yet. Do us a favor and put your head back in the sand, that way you can continue seeing nothing wrong. :lamo
LOL! Sorry you're not in a place where you can accept reality. Jones and Abramson aren't even remotely rationally comparable.
That you think they are is simply more evidence that you have no honest interest in the subject matter.
Delusional thinking at best.... but I don't have to tell you that. Please list the indictments where people were arrested for collusion with the Russians? Oh that's right there were none!!
Years old financial crimes or people who lied to the FBI. No Russian collusion! Poor souls who still cling the lies told by the MSM! Resist, resist.............eace
The chairman of the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee said its Russia investigation has found no proof that President Donald Trump’s presidential campaign colluded with Moscow.
“If we write a report based upon the facts that we have, then we don’t have anything that would suggest there was collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia,” Republican Richard Burr told CBS News in an interview published on Thursday.
Keep saying that but everyone around Trump's orbit is getting blasted. Keep sticking your head in the sand, that's about the only way for Trumpers to continue supporting Trump. :lamo
...you cannot figure out how members of the Trump campaign working with Russian agents/officials directly relates to collusion? Seriously?Why don't you show how any of that directly relates to Trump/Russia collusion?
I think we're seeing the beginning of the meltdown.
Trump supporters unabashedly lie to prop up their narrative.Delusional thinking at best.... but I don't have to tell you that. Please list the indictments where people were arrested for collusion with the Russians? Oh that's right there were none!!
...you cannot figure out how members of the Trump campaign working with Russian agents/officials directly relates to collusion? Seriously?
Perhaps you ought to just sign off the forums then.
Trump supporters unabashedly lie to prop up their narrative.
Both Papadopolous and Flynn indictments were directly related to collusion.
Also, how come you are not referring to other quotes from Burr that I posted earlier?
Fascinating.
So your nutjob is somehow believable?
Why don't you show how any of that directly relates to Trump/Russia collusion?
I think we're seeing the beginning of the meltdown.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/senate-panel-chief-sees-no-trump-russia-collusion-140941181.html
Shocking.
You mean Democrats spent over 2 years on this ridiculous investigation with nothing to show for it?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/senate-panel-chief-sees-no-trump-russia-collusion-140941181.html
Shocking.
You mean Democrats spent over 2 years on this ridiculous investigation with nothing to show for it?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/senate-panel-chief-sees-no-trump-russia-collusion-140941181.html
Shocking.
You mean Democrats spent over 2 years on this ridiculous investigation with nothing to show for it?
Papadopolous indictment: https://www.justice.gov/file/1007346/downloadPlease show us the indictment from Muller
https://www.yahoo.com/news/senate-panel-chief-sees-no-trump-russia-collusion-140941181.html
Shocking.
You mean Democrats spent over 2 years on this ridiculous investigation with nothing to show for it?
You mean Democrats spent over 2 years on this ridiculous investigation with nothing to show for it?
I think what we're seeing is a disruptive member intent only on baiting.
Thanks to this guy, anyway, for demonstrating just how desperate the Trump camp is, to resort to trolling and baiting without ONE atom of truth.
It really is a sad day to see the filth in these depth, Ronald Regan is rolling in his grave as the Republican party expires its last breaths through guys like this.
That is an incredible fall into the sewer
For those curious, this is a more comprehensive breakdown of Burr's interview. Not surprisingly, all of what Burr says is much more important than what is being provided by the OP.
https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1093555871651635205
Here's a link to the actual story: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/richar...e-committees-russia-investigation-2-years-on/
And here are some interesting quotes from Burr people who want the truth may be interested in:
"He made clear that the investigation is not compiling the story of one pivotal election, but of something larger, more complicated and, from a counterintelligence perspective, more nefarious."
-----
""Many of the connections that we've made are the direct result of intelligence products," he said. "I think it's safe to say we've interviewed people that I don't even know if the special counsel knows about them — but you've got to remember that we're on a totally separate path than what they are.""
-----
""The other piece of that," he said, "is probably work that the committee will do for the next decade. And it's work that has helped even our intelligence community's understanding of Russia's capabilities and intent behind this." "
-----
"The investigation now spans continents and includes sources from countries besides Russia."
-----
"Though most witnesses were encouraged to come in voluntarily, Burr acknowledged he had resorted to issuing subpoenas — either because all other appeals had gone unanswered, or because witnesses themselves had requested it.
Requested to be subpoenaed?
"Can't get into who," Burr said, "but there are some that" — he intimated an elbow nudge as he imitated a witness saying, "'I'll come if you subpoena me.'"
"They wanted the cover of being compelled," he said."
-----
"He argued that the underlying motivations behind some interactions were often hard, and sometimes impossible, to determine, and that what might look like collusion could have an alternative rationale.
"There's an awful lot of connections of all these people," he said. "They may not be connections that are tied to 2016 elections in the United States, but just the sheer fact that they have a relationship — it may be business. It may be Russian intelligence. It may be they're all on the payroll of Oleg Deripaska," he said.
"We've got to try to determine, in our particular case, 'Do they fit in this bucket' — which is the 2016 election efforts — or 'Do they fit in this bucket,' which is the world that we discovered and that we want to continue to look at on more of a counterintelligence platform," he said. "
-----
So contrary to the narrative being presented, things are not nearly as clear cut as the Trump supporters want to pretend they are.
I see you deleted your other post after about 30 seconds.
This new one is just more snot blowing because you're upset the Trump/Russia narrative your side is desperate to push is falling apart.
Well, we do know that a Republican committee chair is going to be very reluctant to find that a Republican President did anything wrong - REGARDLESS of what evidence there is.
That's "something", isn't it?
What fun it must be, imagining that the Trump/Russia narrative is 'falling apart', when you cannot even remotely demonstrate that it actually is.
Yay! Fun!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?